Advertisement

East Asia

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 93–113 | Cite as

Introduction to the Special Issue—China’s Belt and Road Initiative: the View from East Asia

  • Felix Heiduk
  • Alexandra SakakiEmail author
Article
  • 190 Downloads

Abstract

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), formerly known as One Belt One Road (OBOR), has emerged as one of the top priorities for Chinese President Xi Jinping ever since he unveiled the initiative in 2013. This special issue surveys the reception of BRI in East Asia. As China’s immediate neighborhood, this region will play an important role in determining whether Beijing’s signature project will succeed in the mid- to long term. However, research has thus far mostly focused on BRI’s reception in Central Asia and (Eastern) Europe. In this introduction, we first provide an overview of the literature by identifying three main strands of interpretation on BRI, namely those focusing on geoeconomics, on geopolitics, and on international norms as well as order. Next, we provide a review of the contemporary research on both Southeast Asian and Northeast Asian perceptions of and policy responses to BRI. Finally, we discuss research gaps in the literature and provide an overview of case studies and findings in this special issue. We conclude by identifying recurring themes and characteristics in East Asian responses to BRI.

Keywords

Belt and Road Initiative Chinese foreign policy Asian geopolitics Asian geoeconomics Liberal order 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This special issue is based on the proceedings of a workshop held in Berlin in January 2018, which was generously funded by the Robert Bosch Foundation. We would like to thank the Foundation for its support.

References

  1. 1.
    Abe, Shinzo. 2017. "Asia’s Dream: Linking the Pacific and Eurasia". Speech at the Banquet of the 23rd International Conference on The Future of Asia, June 5, 2017, available at https://japan.kantei.go.jp/97_abe/statement/201706/1222768_11579.html (accessed September 7, 2018).
  2. 2.
    Acharya, Amitav. 2014. „Thinking Theoretically about Asian IR“. In International relations of Asia, herausgegeben von David L. Shambaugh und Michael B. Yahuda, Second edition, Asia in world politics: 59–89. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. http://ezproxy.deakin.edu.au/login?url=http://deakin.eblib.com.au/patron/Read.aspx?p=1655579&pg=82. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.
  3. 3.
    Ba, Alice. 2018. „Beyond Dichotomous Choices: Responses to Chinese Initiatives in Southeast Asia“. In Regional Powers and Contested Leadership, herausgegeben von Daniel Flemes und Hannes Ebert, 189–227. Basingstoke: Palgrave. //www.palgrave.com/de/book/9783319736907. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.
  4. 4.
    Basu, Titli. 2018. " Japan’s Belt and Road Puzzle, Decoded", The Diplomat, February 28, 2018, available at https://thediplomat.com/2018/02/japans-belt-and-road-puzzle-decoded/ (accessed September 7, 2018).
  5. 5.
    Sankei Biz. 2017. "'Ittai Ichiro' kōsō nihon, chūgoku to no'kyorikan' ni jirenma shinchō shisei o kuzuresazu" ['One Belt One Road' Structure: Dilemma of 'distance feeling' of Japan and China, cautious stance prevailing], May 15, 2017, https://www.sankeibiz.jp/macro/news/170515/mca1705150500001-n1.htm
  6. 6.
    Brown, Kerry. 2018a. „The PRC’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative, Southeast Asia, and the United States“. In Securing the Belt and Road Initiative, 101–18. Palgrave, Singapore.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7116-4_6.
  7. 7.
    Brown, Kerry. 2018b. „The Belt and Road: Security Dimensions“. Asia Europe Journal, April, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-018-0514-9. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.
  8. 8.
    Cappeletti, Alessandra. 2017. The “Construction” of Chinese Culture in a Globalized World and Its Importance for Beijing’s Smart Power. Notes and concepts on a narrative shift.“ Universität Duisburg-Essen: Institute of East Asian Studies. https://www.uni-due.de/imperia/md/content/in-east/about/publications_green_series/paper115-2017.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.
  9. 9.
    Carter, Becky. 2017. A Literature Review on China’s Aid. K4D Helpdesk report. London: Department for International Development. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/13266.
  10. 10.
    Chheang, Vannarith. 2017. „Cambodia embraces China’s Belt and Road Initiative“. Perspectives No. 48. Singapore: ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chung, Jae Ho. 2015. "Views from Northeast Asia: A Chinese Style Pivot or a Mega-Opportunity?" Global Asia 10(3): 22–26.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chung, Chien-peng, und Thomas J. Voon. 2017. „China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative: Political-Economic Calculations of Southeast Asian States“. Asian Survey 57 (3): 416–49.  https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2017.57.3.416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Castro, Renato Cruz De. 2017. The Duterte Administration’s Foreign Policy: Unravelling the Aquino Administration’s Balancing Agenda on an Emergent China. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 35 (3): 139–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dollar, David. 2017. „Is China’s Development Finance a Challenge to the International Order?“ Paper presented at the JCER conference in Tokyo. Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duncombe C., Dunne T. "After liberal world order"January 2018 Chatham House. The Royal Institute of International AffairsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Esteban, Mario, und Weifeng Zhou. 2018. „Beyond Balancing: China’s approach towards the Belt and Road Initiative“. Journal of Contemporary China, Nr. online first (März).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fujiwara, Hideto. 2016. " One Belt, One Road: a Japanese perspective", International Institute for Asian Studies Newsletter, No. 74, available at https://iias.asia/the-newsletter/article/one-belt-one-road-japanese-perspective (accessed September 7, 2018).
  18. 18.
    Funaiole, Matthew P., und Jonathan E. Hillman. 2018. „China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative: Economic Drivers and Challenges“. CSIS Brief. Washington D.C.: CSIS. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Godehardt, Nadine. 2016. „No End of History“. SWP Research Paper RP 02. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. https://www.swp-berlin.org/en/publication/no-end-of-history/.
  20. 20.
    Goh, Evelyn. 2008. „Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Security Strategies“. International Security 32 (3): 113–57.  https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2008.32.3.113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goh, Sui Noi. 2017. "South Korean President Moon Jae In stresses trade and historical ties with China during visit to Chongqing", The Straits Times, December 16, 2017, available at http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/south-korean-president-moon-jae-in-stresses-trade-and-historical-ties-with-china (accessed September 3, 2018).
  22. 22.
    Gong, Xue. 2018. „China Power Investment Corporation in Myanmar“. In Securing the Belt and Road Initiative, edited by Alessandro Arduino and Xue Gong, 121–46. Singapore: Palgrave.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7116-4_7.
  23. 23.
    Hallgren, Henrik, und Richard Ghiasy. 2017. „Security and Economy on the Belt and Road: Three country case studies“. SIPRI Insights on Peace and Security No. 2017/4. Stockholm: SIPRI.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hong, Zhao. 2016. „China’s One Belt One Road: An overview of the debate“. Trends in Southeast Asia No. 6. Singapore: ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hu, Richard Weixing. 2016. „The Chinese Response to the US Rebalancing Strategy: Sino–US Relations and Washington’s Pivot to Asia“. In Asia Pacific Countries and the US Rebalancing Strategy, edited by David W. F. Huang, 69–84. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-93453-9_5.
  26. 26.
    Hurley, John, Scott Morris, und Gailyn Portelance. 2018. „Examining the Debt Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a Policy Perspective“. CGD Policy Paper 121. Washington D.C.: Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hwang, Balbina. 2016. " A Fork in the Road? Korea and One Belt, One Road Initiative", Korea Economic Institute of America Academic Paper Series, November 16, 2016, available at http://www.keia.org/publication/fork-road-korea-and-china%E2%80%99s-one-belt-one-road-initiative (accessed September 7, 2018).
  28. 28.
    Hwang, Balbina. 2017. "What South Korea Thinks of China's 'Belt and Road'", The Diplomat, January 14, 2017, available at https://thediplomat.com/2017/01/what-south-korea-thinks-of-chinas-belt-and-road/. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.
  29. 29.
    Ikenberry, G. John. 2008. „The Rise of China and the Future of the West“. Foreign Affairs, January 1, 2008. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2008-01-01/rise-china-and-future-west.
  30. 30.
    Japan Times. 2017. "Japan would consider joining China-led AIIB if doubts are dispelled, Abe says", May 16, 2017, available at https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/05/16/business/japan-consider-joining-china-led-aiib-doubts-dispelled-abe-says/#.W5HodMIyWM9. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.
  31. 31.
    Kausikan, Bilahari. 2017. „Dodging and Hedging in Southeast Asia“. The American Interest (blog). 12. Januar 2017. https://www.the-american-interest.com/2017/01/12/dodging-and-hedging-in-southeast-asia/.
  32. 32.
    Kawai, Masahiro. 2017. "Belt and Road Initiative: Japan’s Perspective", Presentation at Foreign Correspondent's Club of Japan, September 29, 2017, available at https://www.erina.or.jp/en/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Kawai-BRI-and-Japan-20170929FCCJRevised.pdf (accessed September 7, 2018).
  33. 33.
    Kristensen, Peter M., und Ras T. Nielsen. 2013. „Constructing a Chinese International Relations Theory: A Sociological Approach to Intellectual Innovation“. International Political Sociology 7 (1): 19–40.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kuik, Cheng-Chwee. 2016. „How Do Weaker States Hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states’ alignment behavior towards China“. Journal of Contemporary China 25 (100): 500–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lee, Tai Hwan. 2016. "One Belt, One Road strategy and Korean-Chinese cooperation", International Institute for Asian Studies Newsletter, No. 74, available at https://iias.asia/the-newsletter/article/one-belt-one-road-strategy-korean-chinese-cooperation (accessed September 7, 2018).
  36. 36.
    Lee, Hochul. 2017. „Power Politics Behind the Transforming Geopolitics in East Asia“. East Asia 34 (4): 307–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-017-9280-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Li, Minjang. 2015. „China’s 'One Belt, One Road' Initiative: New Round of Opening Up“. RSIS Commentaries No. 50. Singapore: RSIS. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mearsheimer, John J. 2014. „Can China Rise Peacefully?“ The National Interest (blog). 25. Oktober 2014. http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/can-china-rise-peacefully-10204. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.
  39. 39.
    Mifune, Emi. 2018. „What Japan Needs to be Careful of Japan-China Cooperation on BRI,“ Global Forum of Japan Commentary, October 26, 2018. http://www.gfj.jp/e/commentary/181026.html
  40. 40.
    Miura, Yuji. 2017. "Clear Gap between Ideal and Reality of China’s ‘one Belt, one road’ initiative – focus safety and risk avoidance under the ‘Go Global’ Strategy," RIM Pacific Business and Industries, 17(65):2–27.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Park, Sungtae Jacky. 2018. „Is South Korea Pro-China and Anti-Japan? It’s Complicated“. The National Interest, August 2, 2018, https://nationalinterest.org/feature/south-korea-pro-china-and-anti-japan-it%E2%80%99s-complicated-27667 (accessed September 25, 2018).
  42. 42.
    Pew Research Center. 2017. „Opinion of China“, Global Indicators Database. http://www.pewglobal.org/database/indicator/24/survey/all/ (accessed 25 December 2018)
  43. 43.
    Ploberger, Christian. 2017. „One Belt, One Road – China’s new grand strategy“. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies 15 (3): 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ratner, Ely. 2018. „Geostrategic and Military Drivers and Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative“. Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission 2nd Session, 115th Congress, Washington D.C., January 25. https://www.cfr.org/report/geostrategic-and-military-drivers-and-implications-belt-and-road-initiative.
  45. 45.
    Renliang, Li. 2016. „Dancing with the Dragon: The Trans-Asia Railway and its impact on Thailand“. Perspective No. 9. Singapore: ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rolland, Nadège. 2017. „China’s “Belt and Road Initiative”: Underwhelming or Game-Changer? ” The Washington Quarterly 40 (1): 127–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sakaki, Alexandra. 2016."Keeping the Dragon at Bay: The South China Sea Dispute in Japan’s Security Strategy". In: Enrico Fels/Truong-Minh Vu (Eds.), Power Politics in Asia's Contested Waters, Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea, Springer 2016, pp. 425–440.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sakaki, Alexandra and Junya Nishino. 2018. "Japan's South Korea predicament". In: International Affairs 94 (4), 6 July 2018, p. 735–754.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sano, Shutaro. 2018. "Japan buckles up to join China's Belt and Road", East Asia Forum, March 20, 2018, available at http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2018/03/20/japan-buckles-up-to-join-chinas-belt-and-road/ (accessed September 7, 2018).
  50. 50.
    Schüller, Margot, und Tam Nguyen. 2015. „Visionen einer maritimen Seidenstraße: China und Südostasien“. GIGA Focus No. 7. Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Shambaugh, David. 2013. China Goes Global: The Partial Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Shindo, Eiichi. 2018. "Nihon kyodaina chansu" [Giant chance for Japan], Kokusai Bōeki, No. 2251, August 7, 2018, p. 4.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Summers, Tim. 2016. „China’s ‘New Silk Roads’: sub-national regions and networks of global political economy“. Third World Quarterly 37 (9): 1628–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Szecheny, Nicholas. et al. 2018 "China’s Maritime Silk Road. Strategic and Economic Implications for the Indo-Pacific Region" CSIS Centre for Strategic and International StudiesGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Tao, Xie. 2017. „Chinese Foreign Policy with Xi Jinping Characteristics“. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (blog). 20. November 2017. https://carnegieendowment.org/2017/11/20/chinese-foreign-policy-with-xi-jinping-characteristics-pub-74765. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.
  56. 56.
    Tekdal, Veysel. 2017. „China’s Belt and Road Initiative: at the crossroads of challenges and ambitions“. The Pacific Review online first: 1–18.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Tiezzi, Shannon. 2017. " In Japan, Trump and Abe Offer Alternative to China’s ‘Belt and Road’", The Diplomat, November 8, 2017, available at https://thediplomat.com/2017/11/in-japan-trump-and-abe-offer-alternative-to-chinas-belt-and-road/ (accessed September 7, 2018).
  58. 58.
    Tong, Sarah Y., und Tuan Yuen Kong. 2018. „Singapore’s Role in the Belt and Road Initiative“. In Securing the Belt and Road Initiative, edited by Alessandro Arduino und Xue Gong, 63–80. Singapore: Palgrave.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7116-4_4.
  59. 59.
    Wang, Yong. 2016. „Offensive for defensive: the belt and road initiative and China’s new grand strategy“. The Pacific Review 29 (3): 455–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Watanabe, Hirotaka. 2018. "The Changing Eurasian International: Strategic Environment and Japan’s Response", JFIR Commentary, January 30, 2018, https://www.jfir.or.jp/e/commentary/180130.html. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.
  61. 61.
    Xi, Jinping. 2017. „Work Together to Build the Silk Road Economic Belt and The 21st Century Maritime Silk Road“. Keynote speech at the opening ceremony of the Belt and Road Forum (BRF) for International Cooperation, Beijing, Mai 14. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-05/14/c_136282982.htm. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.
  62. 62.
    Yoon, Sukjoon. 2015. "China’s Belt and Road Initiative: The South Korean Perspective", China International Studies 55(6): 58–75.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Yu, Hong. 2017. „China’s Belt and Road Initiative and Its Implications for Southeast Asia“. Asia Policy 24 (1): 117–22.  https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2017.0029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations