China’s Belt and Road Initiative and Japan’s Response: from Non-participation to Conditional Engagement

Abstract

China’s “Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)” has been gaining attention, but the evaluation of the scheme is still unsettled due to its multifaceted nature. This paper examines the basic characteristics of the initiative, disaggregates the initiative into separate dimensions, and traces Japan’s responses toward BRI from 2013 to 2018. From 2013 to 2015, the Japanese government and the Diets committee have discussed the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) membership issue intensively. Only after 2015, the discussion covered the BRI, wider topics. By looking at responses by the Japanese government, the initial response until 2016 was “non-participation;” however, after 2017, the government has shifted attitude to “conditional engagement” through business cooperation in the third countries especially plus-sum dimension. Such a shift has been backed by a concurrent risk-hedging approach represented by the Indo-Pacific strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. 1.

    Aoyama, Rumi. (2016). “Understanding “One Belt One Road”: China’s New Global Strategy,” The Journal of Contemporary China Studies, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cao Xin. (2015). “Chuangzao Tiaojian ye Yaoshang de Zhongguo Yidai Yilu,” Financial Times, Chinese version HP, June 8, 2015. http://m.ftchinese.com/story/001062389. Accsessed in 22 June 2015. [in Chinese]

  3. 3.

    Chan, Jay (2015). “‘One belt, one road’ initiative will define China’s role as a world leader,” South China Morning Post, April 2, 2015. Accsessed in 28 June 2015

  4. 4.

    “Cong Sige Zimaoqy dao “Yidaiyilu” Zhongguo Gaige Kaifang Xinbantu.” Banyue Tan, 2 April 2015, http://www.banyuetan.org/chcontent/sz/szgc/201542/130265.shtml. Accessed in 26 June 2015. [in Chinese]

  5. 5.

    Godement, François, and Agatha Kratz ed. (2015). “‘One Belt, One Road’: China’s Great Leap Outward,” China Analysis, European Council on Foreign Relations, June 2015 (http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/China_analysis_belt_road.pdf).

  6. 6.

    Huang, Yiping. (2015). “One Belt One Road must consider the return on investment,” Caixin, January 30, 2015. Accsessed in 22 June 2015. http://m.economy.caixin.com/m/2015-01-30/100780246.html. [in Chinese]

  7. 7.

    Hurley, John, Scott Morris, and Gaily Portelance. (2018) “Examining the Debt Implications of the Belt an Road Initiative from a Policy Perspective,” Center for Global Development Policy Paper 121, March 2018.

  8. 8.

    Jakobson, Linda, Manuel, Ryan. (2016). “How are foreign policy decisions made in China?,” Asia & The Pacific Policy Studies, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Xi Jingping (2014). The Governance of China, State Council Information Office, Central Document Research Section of the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese Foreign Language Publishing Office, eds., Foreign Language Press.

  10. 10.

    Wang Jisi. (2012). “Xijin, Zhongguo Diyuan Zhanlue de Zaipingheng,” the Global Times, October 17, 2012. http://opinion.huanqiu.com/opinion_world/2012-10/3193760.html. Accsessed in 26 June 2015. [in Chinese]

  11. 11.

    Li, Xiangyang. (2015). One Belt One Road: Positioning, Contents, and Priorities, Social Science Academic Press, 2015. [in Chinese]

  12. 12.

    Lin, Justin. (2009). “The Cause and Impact of the Global Financial Crisis: Implications for Developing Countries,” Event Summary, The Peterson Institute for International Economics, February 9, 2009.

  13. 13.

    Lin, Justin. (2012) New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development and Policy, Washington DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2017) Diplomatic Bluebook 2017. [in Japanese]

  15. 15.

    Naughton, Barry. (2013). “China and the Two Crises: From 1997 to 2009,” JICA Research Institute working paper, No. 53, January 2013.

  16. 16.

    Sun, Yun. (2013). “March West: China’s Response to the U.S. Rebalancing,” Brookings Institutes, Blogs, January 31, 2013. http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/up-front/posts/2013/01/31-china-us-sun.

  17. 17.

    The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2015). “Prospects and challenges on China’s ‘one belt, one road’: a risk assessment report,” The Economist Intelligence Report, 2015.

  18. 18.

    The National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the Ministry of Commerce (2015). Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road, March 2015. http://en.ndrc.gov.cn/newsrelease/201503/t20150330_669367.html. [in Chinese]

  19. 19.

    Wang, Dong. (2015). “Is China Trying to Push the U.S. out of East Asia?” China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 1(1): 59–84, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wang Yuzhu. (2015). Yidaiyilu yu Yazhou Yituhua Moshi de Zhonggou (“One Belt One Road” and Reshape of Asian Integration Model), Social Science Academic Press. [in Chinese]

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asei Ito.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ito, A. China’s Belt and Road Initiative and Japan’s Response: from Non-participation to Conditional Engagement. East Asia 36, 115–128 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-019-09311-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Belt and road initiative
  • Sino-Japanese relationship
  • Third countries business corporation
  • Indo-Pacific strategy