Abstract
Regional security studies of the Asia-Pacific commonly center upon China’s rise, leaving other actors underresearched. Among these is Japan, whose ongoing reinterpretation of its pacifist constitution may destabilize the region. This article employs Social Identity Theory, a social psychology theory of group behavior, to develop a unique framework that accounts for both the domestic and international constraints acting upon Japan’s foreign policy makers. By analyzing Japan’s foreign policy evolution through the lost decade of the 1990s into the changed landscape of the post-September 11th world, this article identifies a prevailing trend toward “normalization”. It is argued that Japan is on course to further distance itself from the pacifism embodied in Article 9 of its constitution.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Interaction within the domestic identity hierarchy mirrors that of the other levels of analysis previously discussed. That is to say that domestic groups participate in forms of social mobility, social competition, and social creativity with one another. This line of reasoning holds tremendous potential and could be the basis of a follow-up article.
Given the similarity between the more alarmist elements of the old “Japan rise” literature and the contemporary “China rise” literature—one could argued International Relations theory continues to fall short when accounting for this form of economic competition.
It should be noted that considerable overlap can exist between groups. For instance, an individual could hold both normalist and nationalist sentiments. Nevertheless, the following sections will demonstrate how these norms converge into a limited set of policy options for Japanese leaders.
The option for Japanese participation in multilateral organizations and the development of a comprehensive security agenda that accounts for human and environmental factors may offer one possibility for social creativity. However, there is no space to explore these factors in this article.
References
Betts, R. K. (1993). Wealth, Power, and Instability: East Asia and the United States after the Cold War. International Security, 18(3), 34–77.
Friedberg, A. L. (1993). Ripe for Rivalry Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia. International Security, 18(3), 5–33.
Kawasaki, T. (2001). Postclassical realism and Japanese security policy. [Article]. Pacific Review, 14(2), 221–240, doi:10.1080/09512740110037361.
Green, M. J. (2001). Japan’s reluctant realism: foreign policy challenges in an era of uncertain power. New York: Palgrave.
Kliman, D. M. (2006). Japan’s Security Strategy in the Post-9/11 World: Embracing a New Realpolitik (Vol. 183, WASHINGTON PAPERS): United States, Praeger Publishers.
Hughes, C. W. (2012). The Democratic Party of Japan’s New (but Failing) Grand Security Strategy: From “Reluctant Realism” to “Resentful Realism”? The Journal of Japanese Studies, 38(1), 109–140.
Izumikawa, Y. (2010). Explaining Japanese Antimilitarism: Normative and Realist Constraints on Japan’s Security Policy. International Security, 35(2), 123–160, doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00020.
Berger, T. (1996). Norms, Identity, and National Security in Germany and Japan. In P. J. Katzenstein (Ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Berger, T. (1998). Cultures of antimilitarism: national security in Germany and Japan. Baltimore, MD.: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Berger, T. (2004). Japan’s International Relations: The Political and Security Dimensions. In S. S. Kim (Ed.), The International Relations of Northeast Asia (pp. 135–170): Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Hideo, O. (1997). Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Postwar Japan by Peter J. Katzenstein Columbia University Press: New York, 1996. Journal of Japanese Studies, 23(2), 518–523.
Hook, G. D. (2005). Japan’s International Relations: Politics, Economics and Security: Routledge.
Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Katzenstein, P. J. (2005). A world of regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Katzenstein, P. J. (2008). Rethinking Japanese Security. New York: Routledge.
Oros, A. (2008). Normalizing Japan: politics, identity, and the evolution of security practice. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Dobson, H. (2003). Japan and United Nations peacekeeping: new pressures and new responses. London: Routledge.
Ikenberry, G. J., & Inoguchi, T. (Eds.). (2007). The uses of institutions: the U.S., Japan, and governance in East Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hemmer, C., & Katzenstein, P. J. (2002). Why is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism. International Organization, 56(3), 575–607, doi:10.1162/002081802760199890.
Krauss, E. S., & Christensen, T. J. (2004). Beyond bilateralism: U.S.-Japan relations in the new Asia-Pacific. Stanford, US: Stanford University Press.
Hughes, C. W., & Fukushima, A. (2004). US-Japan Security Relations: Toward Bilateralism Plus? In E. S. K. T. J. Pempel (Ed.), Beyond bilateralism U.S.-Japan relations in the new Asia-Pacific (pp. 61–71). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Preble, C. (2006). Two Normal Countries Rethinking the U.S.-Japan Strategic Relationship. Policy Analysis(566), 1–25.
Samuels, R. J. (2007). Securing Japan: Toyko’s Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hirata, K. (2008). Who Shapes the National Security Debate? Divergent Interpretations of Japan’s Security Role. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 35(3), 123–151.
Linus Hagström (2009). Normalizing Japan: Supporter, Nuisance, or Wielder of Power in the North Korean Nuclear Talks? Asian Survey, 49(5), 831–851.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An Integrative Theory Of Intergroup Conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology Of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1982). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Introduction. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (pp. 1–11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mercer, J. (1995). Anarchy and Identity. International Organization, 49(02), 229–252.
Brown, R. J., & Ross, G. F. (1982). The Battle of Acceptance: An investigation into the Dynamics of Intergroup Behavior. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (pp. 155–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nakane, C. (1970). Japanese society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social Identity Theory and Self-categorization Theory: A Historical Review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 204–222.
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leyens, J.-P., Yzerbyt, V., & Schadron, G. (1994). Sterotypes and Social Cognition. London: Sage Publications.
Operario, D., & Fiske, S. T. (2003). Sterotypes: Content, Structures, Processes, and Context. In R. Brown, & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes (pp. 22–44). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Stangor, C., & Jost, J. T. (1997). Individual, Group, and System Levels of Analysis and their Relevance for Stereotyping and Intergroup Relations. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Stereotyping and Group Life (pp. 336–358). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in Organizations. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
McGarty, C. (2001). Social Identity Theory does not Maintain that Identification Produces Bias. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 173–176.
Larson, D. W., & Shevchenko, A. (2010). Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primary. International Security, 34(4), 63–96.
Martorana, P. V., Galinsky, A. D., & Rao, H. (2005). From System Justification To System Condemnation: Antecedents Of Attempts To Change Power Hierarchies. In M. C. Thomas-Hunt (Ed.), Status and Groups (pp. 283–314). London: Elsevier Ltd.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: a social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. New York: Routledge.
Larson, D. W., & Shevchenko, A. (2003). Shortcut to Greatness: The New Thinking and the Revolution in Soviet Foreign Policy. International Organization, 57(01), doi:10.1017/s0020818303571028.
Checkel, J. T. (1998). Review: The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. International Relations, 50(2), 324–348.
Wendt, A. (1994). Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American Political Science Review, 88(2), 384–396.
Taliaferro, J. W., Lobell, S. E., & Ripsman, N. M. R. (2009). Introduction: Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. In S. E. Lobell, N. M. R. Ripsman, & J. W. Taliaferro (Eds.), Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy (pp. 1–42). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barkin, J. S. (2003). Realist Constructivism. International Studies Review, 5(3), 325–342.
Gilpin, R. G. (1984). The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization, 38(02), 287–304, doi:10.1017/s0020818300026710.
Wohlforth, W. C. (2012). Realism and Foreign Policy. In S. Smith, A. Hadfield, & T. Dunne (Eds.), Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases (pp. 35–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taliaferro, J. W. (2006). Neoclassical Realism: The Psychology of Great Power Intervention. In J. Sterling-Folker (Ed.), Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425.
Wilmer, F. (2002). The social construction of man, the state, and war identity, conflict, and violence in former Yugoslavia. New York: Routledge.
Strayer, R. W. (1998). Why Did the Soviet Union Collapse?: Understanding Historical Change: M.E. Sharpe.
McCauley, M. (2008). The Rise and Fall of the Soviet Union: Longman.
Arase, D. (2007). Japan, The Active State? Security Policy After 9/11. Asian Survey, 47(4), 560–583.
Grimes, W. W. (2004). Japan’s International Relations: The Economic Dimension. In S. S. Kim (Ed.), The International Relations of Northeast Asia (pp. 171–200): Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Terry, E. (2002). How Asia Got Rich: Japan, China and the Asian Miracle: M.E. Sharpe.
Pyle, K. B. (2007). Japan Rising: The Resurgence of Japanese Power and Purpose (A Century Foundation Book). New York: Public Affairs.
Kennedy, P. (1987). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Random House.
Kristof, N. D. (1997). Japan’s Full Story: Inside and Outside of the Cabinet. Foreign Affairs, 76(6).
Waltz, K. (1993). The emerging structure of international politics. International Security, 18(2), 44–79.
Gordon, A. (2003). A Modern History of Japan: From Tokugawa Times to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cooney, K. J. (2002). Japan’s Foreign Policy Maturation: A Quest of Normalcy. New York: Routledge.
Jansen, M. B. (2002). The Making of Modern Japan. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Christensen, R. (2000). Ending the Ldp Hegemony: Party Cooperation in Japan: University of Hawai’i Press.
Kwak, T.-H., & Joo, S.-H. (2003). The Korean Peace Process and the Four Powers: Ashgate.
Tsuchiyama, J. (2007). War Renunciation, Article 9, and Security Policy. In T. U. Berger, M. Mochizuki, & J. Tsuchiyama (Eds.), Japan in International Politics: The Foreign Policies of an Adaptive State (pp. 47–74). Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Flath, D. (2000). The Japanese Economy: Oxford University Press.
Vogel, S. K. (2002). U.S.-Japan Relations in a Changing World. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Goodman, C. F. (2008). The Rule of Law in Japan: A Comparative Analysis: Kluwer Law International.
McDougall, D. (2007). Asia Pacific in world politics. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
U.S. Department of State (2005). Joint Statement U.S.-Japan Security Consultative Committee. In O. O. T. Spokesman (Ed.). Washington, DC: U.S Department of State.
Bisley, N. (2008). The Transformation of the US-Japan Alliance and East Asian Security. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(1), 73–98.
Hughes, C. W. (2004). Japan’s re-emergence as a “normal” military power. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the International Institute of Strategic Studies.
Hughes, C. W. (2009). Japan’s Remilitarization: Routledge for International Institute for Strategic Studies.
A Conversation With Shinzo Abe. (2007, April 22). The Washington Post.
Shinoda, T. (2012). Japan’s Failed Experiment: The DPJ and Institutional Change for Political Leadership. Asian Survey,, 52(5), 799–821.
Kushida, K. E., & Lipscy, P. Y. (2013). Japan Under the DPJ: The Politics of Transition and Governance: Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center.
Hagström, L. (2010). The Democratic Party of Japan’s security policy and Japanese politics of constitutional revision: a cloud over Article 9? Australian Journal of International Affairs, 64(5), 510–525.
Winkler, C. G. (2012). The Quest for Japan’s New Constitution: An Analysis of Visions and Constitutional Reform Proposals 1980–2009. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
SDF’s new anti-piracy base creates a dilemma. (2011, 05 August). The Asahi Shimbun.
Shinoda, T. (2013). Contemporary Japanese Politics: Institutional Changes and Power Shifts: Columbia University Press.
What Japan’s military shift means. (2014, 2 July). BBC News.
Ministry of Defense of Japan (2014). Defense Programs and Budget of Japan: Overview of FY2014 Budget. Tokyo.
Cabinet approval rating nose-dives after ruling camp rams through security bills. (18 July 2015, The Japan Times.
Yoshihide, S. (2005). Nihon no “Midoru Pawa” Gaiko: Sengo Nihon no Sentaku to Koso (Japanese “Middle Power” Diplomacy: Choices and Plans in the Post-World War II Period): Chikuma Shinsho.
Perlo-Freeman, S., & Solmirano, C. (2014). Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2013. SIPRI Fact Sheet: SIPRI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Funaiole, M.P. Conceptualizing Japan’s Foreign Policy Trajectory Through Social Identity Theory. East Asia 32, 361–383 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-015-9249-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-015-9249-z