East Asia

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 361–383 | Cite as

Conceptualizing Japan’s Foreign Policy Trajectory Through Social Identity Theory

Article
  • 898 Downloads

Abstract

Regional security studies of the Asia-Pacific commonly center upon China’s rise, leaving other actors underresearched. Among these is Japan, whose ongoing reinterpretation of its pacifist constitution may destabilize the region. This article employs Social Identity Theory, a social psychology theory of group behavior, to develop a unique framework that accounts for both the domestic and international constraints acting upon Japan’s foreign policy makers. By analyzing Japan’s foreign policy evolution through the lost decade of the 1990s into the changed landscape of the post-September 11th world, this article identifies a prevailing trend toward “normalization”. It is argued that Japan is on course to further distance itself from the pacifism embodied in Article 9 of its constitution.

Keywords

Japanese foreign policy Article 9 Japanese constitution Social Identity Theory Prime Minister Abe Shinzō Asia-Pacific Security 

References

  1. 1.
    Betts, R. K. (1993). Wealth, Power, and Instability: East Asia and the United States after the Cold War. International Security, 18(3), 34–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friedberg, A. L. (1993). Ripe for Rivalry Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia. International Security, 18(3), 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kawasaki, T. (2001). Postclassical realism and Japanese security policy. [Article]. Pacific Review, 14(2), 221–240, doi:10.1080/09512740110037361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Green, M. J. (2001). Japan’s reluctant realism: foreign policy challenges in an era of uncertain power. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kliman, D. M. (2006). Japan’s Security Strategy in the Post-9/11 World: Embracing a New Realpolitik (Vol. 183, WASHINGTON PAPERS): United States, Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hughes, C. W. (2012). The Democratic Party of Japan’s New (but Failing) Grand Security Strategy: From “Reluctant Realism” to “Resentful Realism”? The Journal of Japanese Studies, 38(1), 109–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Izumikawa, Y. (2010). Explaining Japanese Antimilitarism: Normative and Realist Constraints on Japan’s Security Policy. International Security, 35(2), 123–160, doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berger, T. (1996). Norms, Identity, and National Security in Germany and Japan. In P. J. Katzenstein (Ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berger, T. (1998). Cultures of antimilitarism: national security in Germany and Japan. Baltimore, MD.: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berger, T. (2004). Japan’s International Relations: The Political and Security Dimensions. In S. S. Kim (Ed.), The International Relations of Northeast Asia (pp. 135–170): Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hideo, O. (1997). Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Postwar Japan by Peter J. Katzenstein Columbia University Press: New York, 1996. Journal of Japanese Studies, 23(2), 518–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hook, G. D. (2005). Japan’s International Relations: Politics, Economics and Security: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Katzenstein, P. J. (2005). A world of regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katzenstein, P. J. (2008). Rethinking Japanese Security. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oros, A. (2008). Normalizing Japan: politics, identity, and the evolution of security practice. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dobson, H. (2003). Japan and United Nations peacekeeping: new pressures and new responses. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ikenberry, G. J., & Inoguchi, T. (Eds.). (2007). The uses of institutions: the U.S., Japan, and governance in East Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hemmer, C., & Katzenstein, P. J. (2002). Why is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism. International Organization, 56(3), 575–607, doi:10.1162/002081802760199890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krauss, E. S., & Christensen, T. J. (2004). Beyond bilateralism: U.S.-Japan relations in the new Asia-Pacific. Stanford, US: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hughes, C. W., & Fukushima, A. (2004). US-Japan Security Relations: Toward Bilateralism Plus? In E. S. K. T. J. Pempel (Ed.), Beyond bilateralism U.S.-Japan relations in the new Asia-Pacific (pp. 61–71). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Preble, C. (2006). Two Normal Countries Rethinking the U.S.-Japan Strategic Relationship. Policy Analysis(566), 1–25.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Samuels, R. J. (2007). Securing Japan: Toyko’s Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hirata, K. (2008). Who Shapes the National Security Debate? Divergent Interpretations of Japan’s Security Role. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 35(3), 123–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Linus Hagström (2009). Normalizing Japan: Supporter, Nuisance, or Wielder of Power in the North Korean Nuclear Talks? Asian Survey, 49(5), 831–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An Integrative Theory Of Intergroup Conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology Of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1982). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tajfel, H. (1982). Introduction. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (pp. 1–11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mercer, J. (1995). Anarchy and Identity. International Organization, 49(02), 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brown, R. J., & Ross, G. F. (1982). The Battle of Acceptance: An investigation into the Dynamics of Intergroup Behavior. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (pp. 155–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nakane, C. (1970). Japanese society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social Identity Theory and Self-categorization Theory: A Historical Review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 204–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Leyens, J.-P., Yzerbyt, V., & Schadron, G. (1994). Sterotypes and Social Cognition. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Operario, D., & Fiske, S. T. (2003). Sterotypes: Content, Structures, Processes, and Context. In R. Brown, & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes (pp. 22–44). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stangor, C., & Jost, J. T. (1997). Individual, Group, and System Levels of Analysis and their Relevance for Stereotyping and Intergroup Relations. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Stereotyping and Group Life (pp. 336–358). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in Organizations. London, UK: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    McGarty, C. (2001). Social Identity Theory does not Maintain that Identification Produces Bias. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 173–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Larson, D. W., & Shevchenko, A. (2010). Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primary. International Security, 34(4), 63–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Martorana, P. V., Galinsky, A. D., & Rao, H. (2005). From System Justification To System Condemnation: Antecedents Of Attempts To Change Power Hierarchies. In M. C. Thomas-Hunt (Ed.), Status and Groups (pp. 283–314). London: Elsevier Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: a social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Larson, D. W., & Shevchenko, A. (2003). Shortcut to Greatness: The New Thinking and the Revolution in Soviet Foreign Policy. International Organization, 57(01), doi:10.1017/s0020818303571028.
  45. 45.
    Checkel, J. T. (1998). Review: The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. International Relations, 50(2), 324–348.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wendt, A. (1994). Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American Political Science Review, 88(2), 384–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Taliaferro, J. W., Lobell, S. E., & Ripsman, N. M. R. (2009). Introduction: Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. In S. E. Lobell, N. M. R. Ripsman, & J. W. Taliaferro (Eds.), Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy (pp. 1–42). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Barkin, J. S. (2003). Realist Constructivism. International Studies Review, 5(3), 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gilpin, R. G. (1984). The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization, 38(02), 287–304, doi:10.1017/s0020818300026710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wohlforth, W. C. (2012). Realism and Foreign Policy. In S. Smith, A. Hadfield, & T. Dunne (Eds.), Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases (pp. 35–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Taliaferro, J. W. (2006). Neoclassical Realism: The Psychology of Great Power Intervention. In J. Sterling-Folker (Ed.), Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wilmer, F. (2002). The social construction of man, the state, and war identity, conflict, and violence in former Yugoslavia. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Strayer, R. W. (1998). Why Did the Soviet Union Collapse?: Understanding Historical Change: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    McCauley, M. (2008). The Rise and Fall of the Soviet Union: Longman.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Arase, D. (2007). Japan, The Active State? Security Policy After 9/11. Asian Survey, 47(4), 560–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Grimes, W. W. (2004). Japan’s International Relations: The Economic Dimension. In S. S. Kim (Ed.), The International Relations of Northeast Asia (pp. 171–200): Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Terry, E. (2002). How Asia Got Rich: Japan, China and the Asian Miracle: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Pyle, K. B. (2007). Japan Rising: The Resurgence of Japanese Power and Purpose (A Century Foundation Book). New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kennedy, P. (1987). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Random House.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kristof, N. D. (1997). Japan’s Full Story: Inside and Outside of the Cabinet. Foreign Affairs, 76(6).Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Waltz, K. (1993). The emerging structure of international politics. International Security, 18(2), 44–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Gordon, A. (2003). A Modern History of Japan: From Tokugawa Times to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Cooney, K. J. (2002). Japan’s Foreign Policy Maturation: A Quest of Normalcy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Jansen, M. B. (2002). The Making of Modern Japan. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Christensen, R. (2000). Ending the Ldp Hegemony: Party Cooperation in Japan: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kwak, T.-H., & Joo, S.-H. (2003). The Korean Peace Process and the Four Powers: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Tsuchiyama, J. (2007). War Renunciation, Article 9, and Security Policy. In T. U. Berger, M. Mochizuki, & J. Tsuchiyama (Eds.), Japan in International Politics: The Foreign Policies of an Adaptive State (pp. 47–74). Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Flath, D. (2000). The Japanese Economy: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Vogel, S. K. (2002). U.S.-Japan Relations in a Changing World. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Goodman, C. F. (2008). The Rule of Law in Japan: A Comparative Analysis: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    McDougall, D. (2007). Asia Pacific in world politics. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    U.S. Department of State (2005). Joint Statement U.S.-Japan Security Consultative Committee. In O. O. T. Spokesman (Ed.). Washington, DC: U.S Department of State.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Bisley, N. (2008). The Transformation of the US-Japan Alliance and East Asian Security. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(1), 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Hughes, C. W. (2004). Japan’s re-emergence as a “normal” military power. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the International Institute of Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Hughes, C. W. (2009). Japan’s Remilitarization: Routledge for International Institute for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    A Conversation With Shinzo Abe. (2007, April 22). The Washington Post.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Shinoda, T. (2012). Japan’s Failed Experiment: The DPJ and Institutional Change for Political Leadership. Asian Survey,, 52(5), 799–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Kushida, K. E., & Lipscy, P. Y. (2013). Japan Under the DPJ: The Politics of Transition and Governance: Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Hagström, L. (2010). The Democratic Party of Japan’s security policy and Japanese politics of constitutional revision: a cloud over Article 9? Australian Journal of International Affairs, 64(5), 510–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Winkler, C. G. (2012). The Quest for Japan’s New Constitution: An Analysis of Visions and Constitutional Reform Proposals 1980–2009. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    SDF’s new anti-piracy base creates a dilemma. (2011, 05 August). The Asahi Shimbun.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Shinoda, T. (2013). Contemporary Japanese Politics: Institutional Changes and Power Shifts: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    What Japan’s military shift means. (2014, 2 July). BBC News.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Ministry of Defense of Japan (2014). Defense Programs and Budget of Japan: Overview of FY2014 Budget. Tokyo.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Cabinet approval rating nose-dives after ruling camp rams through security bills. (18 July 2015, The Japan Times.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Yoshihide, S. (2005). Nihon no “Midoru Pawa” Gaiko: Sengo Nihon no Sentaku to Koso (Japanese “Middle Power” Diplomacy: Choices and Plans in the Post-World War II Period): Chikuma Shinsho.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Perlo-Freeman, S., & Solmirano, C. (2014). Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2013. SIPRI Fact Sheet: SIPRI.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Strategic and International StudiesWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations