Advertisement

East Asia

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 323–341 | Cite as

Authoritarian Orientations and Political Trust in East Asian Societies

  • Deyong MaEmail author
  • Feng YangEmail author
Article

Abstract

In mainstream political science literature, two main theoretical perspectives on the origins of political trust predominate: institutional theory which argues that political trust is generated from democratic institutions and cultural theory which argues that political trust is rooted in historical-cultural factors such as social trust. However, the influence of other social values, such as authoritarian orientations, has received little attention in the extant literature. This article investigates the determinants of political trust in 13 East Asian societies with a special emphasis on authoritarian orientations. The evidence from our empirical study suggests that authoritarian orientations are an independent cultural source of political trust in these societies.

Keywords

Political trust Origins Authoritarian orientations East Asia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the editor and reviewers for their helpful suggestions. Financial support came from the Humanities and Social Science Programme 2013 of Ministry of Education, China (project number: 13JYA630063) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (project number: NKZXA1211). We also appreciate the Asian Barometer Project Office (www.asianbarometer.org) for providing data collected by the Asian Barometer Project, which was co-directed by Professors Fu Hu and Yun-han Chu and received major funding support from Taiwan’s Ministry of Education, Academia Sinica and National Taiwan University. The Asian Barometer Project Office is solely responsible for the data distribution. The views expressed herein are the authors' own and we alone are responsible for any remaining errors.

References

  1. 1.
    Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). Civic Culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson, C. J., & Lotempio, A. J. (2002). Winning, losing and political trust in America. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benedict, R. (2007). The chrysanthemum and the sword. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boudreau, V. (2009). Elections, repression and authoritarian survival in post-transition Indonesia and the Philippines. Pacific Review, 22(2), 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bowler, S., & Karp, J. A. (2004). Politicians, scandals, and trust in government. Political Behavior, 26(3), 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Braithwaite, V. A., & Levi, M. (1998). Trust and governance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Case, W. (2009). Contemporary authoritarianism in Southeast Asia: Structures, institutions and agency. Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Case, W. (2009). Low-quality democracy and varied authoritarianism: Elites and regimes in Southeast Asia today. Pacific Review 22, 3: 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chang, Y. T., Chu, Y. H., & Park, C. M. (2007). Authoritarian nostalgia in Asia. Journal of Democracy, 18(3), 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chanley, V. A., Rudolph, T. J., & Rahn, W. M. (2000). The origins and consequences of public trust in government: A time series analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Charney, E. (2008). Genes and ideologies. Perspectives on Politics, 6(2), 299–319.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chu, Y. H., Diamond, L., Nathan, A., & Chull, D. (2008). How East Asians view democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dahl, R. (1998). On democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dalton, R. J., & Ong, N. T. (2005). Authority orientations and democratic attitudes: A test of the ‘Asian Values’ hypothesis. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 6(2), 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davidson, J. S. (2009). Dilemmas of democratic consolidation in Indonesia. Pacific Review, 22(3), 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dickson, B. (1992). What explains Chinese political behavior? The debate over structure and culture. Comparative Politics, 25(1), 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eckstein, H. (1988). A culturalist theory of political change. The American Political Science Review, 82(3), 789–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Geddes, B., & Zaller, J. 1989. Sources of popular for authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 33(2), 319–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gibson, J. (1989). Understandings of justice: Institutional legitimacy, procedural justice, and political tolerance. Law & Society Review, 23(3), 469–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hardin, R. (1993). The street level epistemology of trust. Politics & Society, 21(4), 505–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hardin, R. (2006). Trust. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Heryanto, A., & Hadiz, V. R. (2005). Post-authoritarian Indonesia: A comparative Southeast Asian perspective. Critical Asian Studies, 37(2), 251–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heryanto, A., &Mandal, S. K. (2003). Challenging authoritarianism in Southeast Asia: Comparing Indonesia and Malaysia. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hetherington, M. J. 1998. “The Political Relevance of Political Trust.” The American Political Science Review 92, 4: 791–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kekic, L. (2007). “The Economist intelligence unit’s index of democracy.” The Economist. http://graphics.eiu.com/PDF/Democracy%20Index%202008.pdf. Accessed 12 December 2011.
  32. 32.
    Kumlin, S. (2004). The personal and the political: How personal welfare state experiences affect political trust and ideology. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kumlin, S., &Rothstein, B. (2005). Making and breaking social capital. Comparative Political Studies, 38(4), 339–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Levi, M. (1998). A State of Trust. In V. Braithwaite & M. Levi (Ed.), Trust and governance (pp. 77–101). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li, L. J. (2004). Political trust in rural China. Modern China, 30(2), 228–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Li, L. J. (2008). Political trust and petitioning in the Chinese countryside. Comparative Politics, 40(2), 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lin, Y. T. (2010). My country and my people. Oxford: Benediction ClassicsGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ma, D. Y. (2007). Institutional and cultural factors of political trust in eight Asian societies: A comparative analysis. Comparative Economic and Social Systems, 5, 79–86. (Chinese)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Manion, M. (2006). Democracy, community, trust: The impact of elections in rural China. Comparative Political Studies, 39(3), 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    McCourt, K., Bouchard, T. J., Lykken, D. T., Tellegen, A., & Keyes, M. (1999). Authoritarianism revisited: genetic and environmental influences examined in twins reared apart and together. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(5), 985–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2005). What are the political consequences of trust? Comparative Political Studies, 38(9), 1050–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mockabee, S. (2007). A question of authority: Religion and cultural conflict in the 2004 election. Political Behavior, 29(2), 221–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nathan, A. J., & Chen, T. H. (2004). Traditional social values, democratic values, and political participation. Asian Barometer Survey Working Paper Series, 23.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Newton, K. 2001. Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review, 22(2), 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Norris, P. (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Offe, C. (1999). How can we trust our fellow citizens? In M. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and Trust (pp. 42–87). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Paluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. (2009). “Deference, dissent, and dispute resolution: An experimental intervention using mass media to change norms and behavior in Rwanda.” American Political Science Review, 103(4), 622–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Park, C. M. (1991). Authoritarian rule in South Korea: Political support and governmental performance. Asian Survey, 31(8), 743–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Park, C. M., & Shin, D. C. (2006). Do Asian values deter popular support for democracy in South Korea? Asian Survey, 46(3), 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pharr, S. J., & Putnam, R. D. (2000). Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Pharr, S. J., Putnam, R. D., & Dalton, R. J. (2000). A quarter century of declining confidence. Journal of Democracy, 11(2), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Pye, L. W., & Pye, M. W. (1985). Asian power and politics: The cultural dimensions of authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rothstein, B. (2009). Creating political legitimacy: Electoral democracy versus quality of government. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2008). The state and social capital: An institutional theory of generalized trust. Comparative Politics, 40(4), 441–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Shi, T. J. (2001). Cultural values and political trust: A comparison of the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan. Comparative Politics, 33(4), 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Solt, F. (2012). The social origins of authoritarianism. Political Research Quarterly, 65(4), 703–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    de Tocqueville, A. (2000). Democracy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Transparency International. (2005–2008). Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). http://www.transparency.org/. Accessed 7 June 2012.
  64. 64.
    Uslaner, E. M. (1999). Democracy and social capital. In M. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and Trust (pp. 121–150). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Uslaner, E. M. (2001). The moral foundation of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Uslaner, E. M., & Badescu, G. (2004). Honesty, trust, and legal norms in the transition to democracy: Why Bo Rothstein is better able to explain Sweden than Romania. In Bo Rothstein, B., Rose-Ackerman, S., & Kornai, J. (Ed.), Creating Social Trust in Post-Socialist Transition (pp. 31–51). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Wang, Z. X. (2005). Before the emergence of critical citizens: Economic development and political trust in China. International Review of Sociology, 15(1), 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wang, Z. X. & Tan, E. S. (2012). The conundrum of authoritarian resiliency: Hybrid regimes and non-democratic regimes in East Asia. Asian Barometer Working Paper Series, 65.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wiarda, H. J. (2002). The soul of Latin America: The cultural and political tradition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wong, T. K. Y., Wan, P. S., & Hsiao, H. H. M. (2011). The bases of political trust in six Asian societies: Institutional and cultural explanations compared. International Political Science Review, 32(3), 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Yang, K. S. (1995). “Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysis.” In Lin, T. Y., Tseng, W. S. & Yeh, Y. K. (Ed.) Chinese Societies and Mental Health (pp. 19–39). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zhou Enlai School of GovernmentNankai UniversityTianjinChina
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations