From Spiritual Homes to National Shrines: Religious Traditions and Nation-Building in Vietnam

Abstract

As in China and Soviet Russia, religion in Vietnam was considered to be harmful superstition. However, a glimpse into the Governmental Gazette – Công Báo – displays the important transformation of the state’s policy toward religion that became translated into national representation. While this article focuses on nation-building as a dynamic cultural process that leads to the promotion of selected religious practices as ‘national heritage,’ it also explores the state-society relationship beyond binaries. By looking at religious spaces and local communities I argue that in Vietnam religion is a powerful form of nation-building process and constitutes a creative space in which different actors exercise their agency beyond resistance and accommodation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Nghị quyết hội nghị lần thứ năm Ban chấp hành Trung uơng Đảng (khóa VIII) về xây dựng và phát triển nền văn hóa Việt Nam tiên tiến, đậm dà bản sắc dân tộc [Resolution No.5 of the Central Committee of the Communist Party on building progressive culture, imbued with national identity], số 03/NQ-T ngày 16/17/1998, retrieved on 2 December 2010 from http://www.na.gov.vn/sach_qh/chinhsachpl/phan1/p1_iv_16.html

  2. 2.

    Based on her survey in archives of the Ministry of Culture, Endres [23] points out that until 1996, altogether 1860 historic sites and monuments were officially recognized as historical and cultural sites.

  3. 3.

    Already in the thirteenth century the Trần court – fervent Buddhists – honored the villagers’ tutelary spirits, however such practices were not the same as imperial control over spirits initiated in sixteenth century by the Lê dynasty. By the fifteenth century Đại Việt shared many patterns with its Southeast Asian neighbours; Mahayana Buddhism and the spirit cult were the main forms of popular beliefs. Chinese Neo-Confucianism with its rigid moralistic ideology only began to have a more significant impact in the Lê period ([58], p. 298; see also [59], p.11-12; [52]).

  4. 4.

    The Hoàng Sa and Trường Sa flotillas were established by the Nguyễn lords around the turn of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries the Nguyễn dynasty continued to carry out naval activities in the vicinity of the Paracel and Spratly archipelagos.

  5. 5.

    See VietNamNet 1 May 2010, http://english.vietnamnet.vn/politics/201001/Paracel-and-Spratly-flotilla-preservation-underway-887929/, accessed on 7 September 2010.

References

  1. 1.

    Amer, R. (2002). The Sino-Vietnamese approach to managing boundary disputes. Durham: International Boundaries Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Anagnost, A. S. (1994). The politics of ritual displacement. In Ch. F. Keyes, L. Kendall & H. Hardacre (Eds.), Asian visions of authority: Religion and the modern states of East and Southeast Asia (pp. 221–254). Honolulu University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Boudarel, G. (1991). L'insertion du pouvoir central dans les cultes villageois au Vietnam: Esquisse des problèmes à partir des écrits de Ngô Tat Tô. In A. Forest, Y. Ishizawa & L. Vandermeersch (Eds.), Cultes populaires et societétés asiatiques: Appareils cultuels et appareils de pouvoir (pp. 87–144). Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, l'Université Paris, l'Institute of Asian Cultures, l'Universté Sophia (Tôkyô).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Comaroff, J. (1985). Body of power spirits of resistance: The culture and history of a South African people. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Công Báo (1955a). Sắc Lệnh số 234-SL ngày 14-6-1955 ban hành chính sách tôn giáo [Decree no. 234-SL of 14-6-1955 on the promulgation religious policy], số [no.] 11, 154–155.

  6. 6.

    Công Báo (1955b). Nghị định số 559 -TTg ngày 14-7-1955 định mức thuế nông nghiệp cho những phần ruộng đất mà nhà thờ, nhà chùa, thánh thất được sử dụng từ sau cải cách ruộng đất [Decree no. 559 - TTg of 14-7-1955 on agricultural tax normalization of land used by churches, Buddhist pagodas, and oratories since the land reform], số [no.] 12, 172.

  7. 7.

    Công Báo (1956). Thông tư số 954 - ngày về việc bảo vệ những di tích lịch sư [Circular no.954 - TTg on the protection of places of historical interest], số [no.] 20, 189.

  8. 8.

    Công Báo (1960). Thông Tư số 165/VH/VP ngày 2-2-1960 về việc bảo quản, sử dụng, tu sửa các công trình kiến trúc chưa xếp hạng (đình, chùa, lăng, miếu, cầu, quán, nhà thờ, mồ mả, v.v… ) và các động sản phụ thuộc (bia, đồ thờ, đồ trang trí, cây cổ thụ, v.v…) [Circular Letter no. 165/VH/VP of 2-2-1960 on the preservation, use, and repair of architectural constructions that have not been yet classified (communal houses, pagodas, imperial tombs, temples, roadside shrines, palaces, churches, graves, etc.) and personal assets (tombstones, cult objects, decoration objects, century-old trees, etc.)], số [no.]19, 338.

  9. 9.

    Công Báo (1962). Quyết định số 313-VH/VP ngày 28-4-1962 về việc xếp hạng những di tích, danh thắng toàn miền Bắc [Decision no. 313-VH/VP of 28-4-1962 on the classification of monuments and places of natural beauty in North Vietnam], số [no.] 21, 340.

  10. 10.

    Công Báo (1966). Chỉ thị số 188-TTg/VG ngày 24-10-1966 về việc bảo vệ và phát huy tác dụng của di tích lịch sử trong thời gian chống Mỹ cứu nước [Directive no.188-TTg/VG of 24-10-1966 on the protection and development of places of historical interest at the time of resistance against the American aggressors for national salvation], số [no.] 13, 270.

  11. 11.

    Công Báo (1973). Chỉ thị số 88-TTg ngày 26-4-1973 về việc chấp hành chính sách đối với việc bảo vệ các chùa thờ Phật và đối với tăng ni [Directive no. 88 -TTg of 26 - 4–1973 on the implementation of the policy on protection of Buddhist pagodas and clergy], số [no.] 15, 252–254.

  12. 12.

    Công Báo (1974). Quyết định số 15-VH/QĐ ngày 13-3-1974 về việc xếp hạng di tích lịch sử và văn hóa đợt III [Decision no. 15-VH/QĐ of 13-3-1974 on the classification of historical and cultural monuments, 3rd stage], số [no.] 4, 51.

  13. 13.

    Công Báo (1975). Quyết định số 09-VH/QĐ ngày 21-2-1975 việc xếp hạng di tích lịch sử và văn hóa đợt IV [Decision no. 09-VH/QĐ of 21-2-1975 on the classification of historical and cultural monuments, 4th stage], số [no.] 6, 91.

  14. 14.

    Công Báo (1980). Quyết định số 92-VH/QĐ ngày 10-7-1980 xếp hạng 17 di tích lịch sử và văn hóa [Decision no. 92-VH/QĐ of 10-7-1980 on the classification of 17 historical and cultural monuments], số [no.] 12, 230–232.

  15. 15.

    Công Báo (1982). Quyết định số 147-VH/QĐ ngày 24 -12-1982 xếp hạng 8 di tích lịch sử và văn hóa [Decision no. 147-VH/QĐ of 24-12-1982 on the classification of 8 historical and cultural monuments], số [no.] 25, 532.

  16. 16.

    Công Báo (1984). Pháp Lệnh ngày 31-3-1984 bảo vệ và sử dụng di tích lịch sử, văn hóa và danh lam, thăng cảnh [State Law of 31–3 -1984 on the protection and use of places of historical and cultural interest and of beautiful landscape], số [no.] 8, 154.

  17. 17.

    Công Báo (2001). Luật Di sản văn hóa, số 28/2001/QH10 ngày 29/6/2001[State Law on Cultural Heritage, no. 28/2001/QH10 ngày 29/6/2001], số [no.] 34, 2231–2243.

  18. 18.

    Công Báo (2002). Nghị Định của Chính phủ số 92/20002/NĐ-CP ngày 11/11/2002 quy định chi tiết thi hành một số điều của Luật Di sản văn hóa [Decree of the Government no. 92/2002 NĐ-CP of 11/11/2002 ] on elaboration of the implementation of some clauses of State Law on Cultural Heritage], số [no.] 61, 4045–4066.

  19. 19.

    DiGregorio M. & Salemink O. (2007). Living with the dead: The politics of ritual and remembrance in contemporary Vietnam. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 38 (3), 443–440.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Do, Thien. (2003). Vietnamese supernaturalism: Views from the southern region. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Endres, K. W. (2000). Ritual, Fest und Politik in Nordvietnam: zwischen Ideologie und Tradition. Münster: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Endres, K. W. (2001). Local dynamics of renegotiating ritual space in Northern Vietnam: The case of the dinh. Sojourn, 16 (1),70-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Endres, K. W. (2002). Beautiful customs, worthy traditions: Changing state discourse on the role of Vietnamese culture. Internationales Asienforum, 33 (3–4), 303–322.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Endres, K. W. (2008). Engaging the spirits of the dead: Soul-calling rituals and the performative construction of efficacy. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (14), 755–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Evans, G. (1998). The politics of ritual and remembrance: Laos since 1975. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hobsbawm, E. J. & Ranger, T. O. (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Cambridge University Press.

  28. 28.

    Ho Tai, Hue Tam. (2001). The country of memory: Remaking the past in late socialist Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Keyes, Ch. F. (2002). National heroine or local spirit? The struggle over memory in the case of Thao Suranari of Nakhon Ratchasima. In Tanabe Shigeharu and Charles F. Keyes (Eds.), Cultural crisis and social memory: Modernity and identity in Thailand and Laos (pp. 113–135). London: RoutledgeCurzon.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Keyes, Ch. F., Laurel Kendall & H. Hardacre (Eds.). (1994). Introduction: Contested visions of community in East and Southeast Asia. In Ch. F. Keyes, L. Kendall & H. Hardacre (Eds.), Asian Visions of Authority: Religion and the Modern States of East and Southeast Asia. Honolulu University of Hawaii Press.

  31. 31.

    Kwon, H. (2006). After the massacre: Commemoration and consolation in Ha My and My Lai. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lê Quý Đôn. (1972 [1776]). Phủ Biên Tạp Lục [A Compilation of the Miscellaneous Records When the Southern Border was Pacified], vol.1, Saigon: Phủ Quốc Vụ Khạnh Đặc Trách Văn Hóa.

  33. 33.

    Malarney, S. K. (2007). Festivals and the dynamics of the exceptional dead in Northern Vietnam. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 38 (8), 515–540.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Mandair, Arvind-Pal S. (2009). Religion and the specter of the West: Sikhism, India, postcoloniality, and the politics of translation. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mbembe, A. (1992). The banality of power and the aesthetics of vulgarity in the postcolony. Public Culture, 4 (2),1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Migdal, J. S. (1994). The State in society: An approach to struggles for domination. In J. S. Migdal, A. Kohli & V. Shue (Eds.), State power and social forces: Domination and transformation in the third world (pp. 5–34). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Nguyễn Nhã. (1975). Đặc Khảo về Hoàng sa và Trường Sa [Solid research on the Paracel and Spratly]. Sử Địa 29 (1–3), 258–273.

  38. 38.

    Ninh, Kim N.B. (2002). A World of political transformed: The politics of culture in revolutionary Vietnam, 1945–1965. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ortner, S. B. (1995). Resistance and the problem of ethnographic refusal. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 37 (1), 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ortner, S. B. (2006). Anthropology and social theory: Culture, power and the acting subject. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Pelley, P. M. (2002). Postcolonial Vietnam: New histories of the national past. Durkham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Pham, Quynh Phuong. (2009). Hero and deity: Tran Hung Dao and the resurgence of popular religion in Vietnam. Chiang Mai: Mekong Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Roszko, E. (2010). Commemoration and the state: Memory and legitimacy in Vietnam. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, Vol. 25. no. 1, pp.1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Salemink, O. (2007). The Emperor’s new clothes: Re-fashioning ritual in the Huế festival. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 38 (3), 559–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Salemink, O. (2008). Spirits of consumption and the capitalist ethic in Vietnam. In P. Kitiarsa (Eds.) Religious commodifications in Asia: Marketing gods (pp. 147–168). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Salemink, O. (forthcoming). Appropriating culture: The politics of intangible cultural heritage in Vietnam. In Hue-Tam Ho Tai & M. Sidel (Eds.) Property and power: State, society and market in Vietnam. New York and London: Routledge.

  47. 47.

    Sutherland, C. (2005). Nation-building through discourse theory. Nations and Nationalism, 11 (2), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Sutherland, C. (2006). Calculated conviction: Contemporary nationalist ideology and strategy. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 6 (1), 69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Taylor, P. (2001). Fragments of the present: Searching for modernity in Vietnam's South. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Taylor, P. (2007). Modernity and re-enchantment: Religion in post-revolutionary Vietnam (pp. 194–220). Singapore: ISEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Trần, Quốc Vượng. (1992). Popular culture and high culture in Vietnamese history. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 7 (2), 5–38.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Trần, Quốc Vượng. (1995). The legend of Ông Dóng from the text to the field. In K. W. Taylor & J. Whitmore (Eds.) Essays into Vietnamese Pasts (pp.13-41). New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Truong, Huyen Chi. (2001). Changing processes of social reproduction in the Northern Vietnam countryside: An Ethnographic study of Đồng Vàng village (Red River Delta). Ph.D. Toronto: University of Toronto.

  54. 54.

    Truong, Huyen Chi. (2004). Winter Crop and spring festival: The contestations of local government in a Red River Delta commune. In Benedict J. Kerkvliet Tria & D. G. Marr, Beyond Hanoi: Local Government in Vietnam (pp.110-136). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Van der Veer, P. & Lehmann, H. (1999). Nation and religion: Perspectives on Europe and Asia. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Weber, M. (2004). The vocation lectures. D. Owen & T. B. Strong (Eds.) Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Whitmore, J. K. (1980). Bureaucratic control of the spirits in Vietnam. Association of Asian Studies, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Whitmore, J. K. (1984). Social organization and Confucian thought in Vietnam. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 15 (2), 296–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Wolters, O. W. (1988). Two essays on Đại-Việt in the fourteenth century. New Heaven CT: Council of Southeast Asian Studies, Yale Centre for International and Area Studies.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research in the National Library of Vietnam (Hanoi) for this article was supported by the grant of the Polish Ministry of Education and Sport in 2005. Fieldwork on Lý Sơn Island was made possible thanks to the doctoral grant of the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology in Halle, Germany. I also would like to thank the Center of Asia-Pacific Area Studies, Academia Sinica which provided support, both in terms of office space and library resources. Additionally, I am indebted to Kirsten Endres for drawing my attention to the Công Báo documents during our discussion in Hanoi 2004. I am also grateful to Claire Sutherland for her editorial work on this issue, and to Oscar Salemink and two anonymous reviewers for East Asia for their excellent comments on a previous version of this article.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edyta Roszko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roszko, E. From Spiritual Homes to National Shrines: Religious Traditions and Nation-Building in Vietnam. East Asia 29, 25–41 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-011-9156-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cultural heritage
  • Nation-building
  • National heritage
  • Religious traditions
  • Vietnamese modernity