Advertisement

East Asia

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 25–41 | Cite as

From Spiritual Homes to National Shrines: Religious Traditions and Nation-Building in Vietnam

  • Edyta RoszkoEmail author
Article

Abstract

As in China and Soviet Russia, religion in Vietnam was considered to be harmful superstition. However, a glimpse into the Governmental Gazette – Công Báo – displays the important transformation of the state’s policy toward religion that became translated into national representation. While this article focuses on nation-building as a dynamic cultural process that leads to the promotion of selected religious practices as ‘national heritage,’ it also explores the state-society relationship beyond binaries. By looking at religious spaces and local communities I argue that in Vietnam religion is a powerful form of nation-building process and constitutes a creative space in which different actors exercise their agency beyond resistance and accommodation.

Keywords

Cultural heritage Nation-building National heritage Religious traditions Vietnamese modernity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Research in the National Library of Vietnam (Hanoi) for this article was supported by the grant of the Polish Ministry of Education and Sport in 2005. Fieldwork on Lý Sơn Island was made possible thanks to the doctoral grant of the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology in Halle, Germany. I also would like to thank the Center of Asia-Pacific Area Studies, Academia Sinica which provided support, both in terms of office space and library resources. Additionally, I am indebted to Kirsten Endres for drawing my attention to the Công Báo documents during our discussion in Hanoi 2004. I am also grateful to Claire Sutherland for her editorial work on this issue, and to Oscar Salemink and two anonymous reviewers for East Asia for their excellent comments on a previous version of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Amer, R. (2002). The Sino-Vietnamese approach to managing boundary disputes. Durham: International Boundaries Research Unit.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anagnost, A. S. (1994). The politics of ritual displacement. In Ch. F. Keyes, L. Kendall & H. Hardacre (Eds.), Asian visions of authority: Religion and the modern states of East and Southeast Asia (pp. 221–254). Honolulu University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boudarel, G. (1991). L'insertion du pouvoir central dans les cultes villageois au Vietnam: Esquisse des problèmes à partir des écrits de Ngô Tat Tô. In A. Forest, Y. Ishizawa & L. Vandermeersch (Eds.), Cultes populaires et societétés asiatiques: Appareils cultuels et appareils de pouvoir (pp. 87–144). Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, l'Université Paris, l'Institute of Asian Cultures, l'Universté Sophia (Tôkyô).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Comaroff, J. (1985). Body of power spirits of resistance: The culture and history of a South African people. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Công Báo (1955a). Sắc Lệnh số 234-SL ngày 14-6-1955 ban hành chính sách tôn giáo [Decree no. 234-SL of 14-6-1955 on the promulgation religious policy], số [no.] 11, 154–155.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Công Báo (1955b). Nghị định số 559 -TTg ngày 14-7-1955 định mức thuế nông nghiệp cho những phần ruộng đất mà nhà thờ, nhà chùa, thánh thất được sử dụng từ sau cải cách ruộng đất [Decree no. 559 - TTg of 14-7-1955 on agricultural tax normalization of land used by churches, Buddhist pagodas, and oratories since the land reform], số [no.] 12, 172.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Công Báo (1956). Thông tư số 954 - ngày về việc bảo vệ những di tích lịch sư [Circular no.954 - TTg on the protection of places of historical interest], số [no.] 20, 189.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Công Báo (1960). Thông Tư số 165/VH/VP ngày 2-2-1960 về việc bảo quản, sử dụng, tu sửa các công trình kiến trúc chưa xếp hạng (đình, chùa, lăng, miếu, cầu, quán, nhà thờ, mồ mả, v.v… ) và các động sản phụ thuộc (bia, đồ thờ, đồ trang trí, cây cổ thụ, v.v…) [Circular Letter no. 165/VH/VP of 2-2-1960 on the preservation, use, and repair of architectural constructions that have not been yet classified (communal houses, pagodas, imperial tombs, temples, roadside shrines, palaces, churches, graves, etc.) and personal assets (tombstones, cult objects, decoration objects, century-old trees, etc.)], số [no.]19, 338.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Công Báo (1962). Quyết định số 313-VH/VP ngày 28-4-1962 về việc xếp hạng những di tích, danh thắng toàn miền Bắc [Decision no. 313-VH/VP of 28-4-1962 on the classification of monuments and places of natural beauty in North Vietnam], số [no.] 21, 340.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Công Báo (1966). Chỉ thị số 188-TTg/VG ngày 24-10-1966 về việc bảo vệ và phát huy tác dụng của di tích lịch sử trong thời gian chống Mỹ cứu nước [Directive no.188-TTg/VG of 24-10-1966 on the protection and development of places of historical interest at the time of resistance against the American aggressors for national salvation], số [no.] 13, 270.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Công Báo (1973). Chỉ thị số 88-TTg ngày 26-4-1973 về việc chấp hành chính sách đối với việc bảo vệ các chùa thờ Phật và đối với tăng ni [Directive no. 88 -TTg of 26 - 4–1973 on the implementation of the policy on protection of Buddhist pagodas and clergy], số [no.] 15, 252–254.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Công Báo (1974). Quyết định số 15-VH/QĐ ngày 13-3-1974 về việc xếp hạng di tích lịch sử và văn hóa đợt III [Decision no. 15-VH/QĐ of 13-3-1974 on the classification of historical and cultural monuments, 3rd stage], số [no.] 4, 51.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Công Báo (1975). Quyết định số 09-VH/QĐ ngày 21-2-1975 việc xếp hạng di tích lịch sử và văn hóa đợt IV [Decision no. 09-VH/QĐ of 21-2-1975 on the classification of historical and cultural monuments, 4th stage], số [no.] 6, 91.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Công Báo (1980). Quyết định số 92-VH/QĐ ngày 10-7-1980 xếp hạng 17 di tích lịch sử và văn hóa [Decision no. 92-VH/QĐ of 10-7-1980 on the classification of 17 historical and cultural monuments], số [no.] 12, 230–232.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Công Báo (1982). Quyết định số 147-VH/QĐ ngày 24 -12-1982 xếp hạng 8 di tích lịch sử và văn hóa [Decision no. 147-VH/QĐ of 24-12-1982 on the classification of 8 historical and cultural monuments], số [no.] 25, 532.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Công Báo (1984). Pháp Lệnh ngày 31-3-1984 bảo vệ và sử dụng di tích lịch sử, văn hóa và danh lam, thăng cảnh [State Law of 31–3 -1984 on the protection and use of places of historical and cultural interest and of beautiful landscape], số [no.] 8, 154.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Công Báo (2001). Luật Di sản văn hóa, số 28/2001/QH10 ngày 29/6/2001[State Law on Cultural Heritage, no. 28/2001/QH10 ngày 29/6/2001], số [no.] 34, 2231–2243.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Công Báo (2002). Nghị Định của Chính phủ số 92/20002/NĐ-CP ngày 11/11/2002 quy định chi tiết thi hành một số điều của Luật Di sản văn hóa [Decree of the Government no. 92/2002 NĐ-CP of 11/11/2002 ] on elaboration of the implementation of some clauses of State Law on Cultural Heritage], số [no.] 61, 4045–4066.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    DiGregorio M. & Salemink O. (2007). Living with the dead: The politics of ritual and remembrance in contemporary Vietnam. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 38 (3), 443–440.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Do, Thien. (2003). Vietnamese supernaturalism: Views from the southern region. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Endres, K. W. (2000). Ritual, Fest und Politik in Nordvietnam: zwischen Ideologie und Tradition. Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Endres, K. W. (2001). Local dynamics of renegotiating ritual space in Northern Vietnam: The case of the dinh. Sojourn, 16 (1),70-71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Endres, K. W. (2002). Beautiful customs, worthy traditions: Changing state discourse on the role of Vietnamese culture. Internationales Asienforum, 33 (3–4), 303–322.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Endres, K. W. (2008). Engaging the spirits of the dead: Soul-calling rituals and the performative construction of efficacy. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (14), 755–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Evans, G. (1998). The politics of ritual and remembrance: Laos since 1975. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hobsbawm, E. J. & Ranger, T. O. (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ho Tai, Hue Tam. (2001). The country of memory: Remaking the past in late socialist Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Keyes, Ch. F. (2002). National heroine or local spirit? The struggle over memory in the case of Thao Suranari of Nakhon Ratchasima. In Tanabe Shigeharu and Charles F. Keyes (Eds.), Cultural crisis and social memory: Modernity and identity in Thailand and Laos (pp. 113–135). London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Keyes, Ch. F., Laurel Kendall & H. Hardacre (Eds.). (1994). Introduction: Contested visions of community in East and Southeast Asia. In Ch. F. Keyes, L. Kendall & H. Hardacre (Eds.), Asian Visions of Authority: Religion and the Modern States of East and Southeast Asia. Honolulu University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kwon, H. (2006). After the massacre: Commemoration and consolation in Ha My and My Lai. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lê Quý Đôn. (1972 [1776]). Phủ Biên Tạp Lục [A Compilation of the Miscellaneous Records When the Southern Border was Pacified], vol.1, Saigon: Phủ Quốc Vụ Khạnh Đặc Trách Văn Hóa.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Malarney, S. K. (2007). Festivals and the dynamics of the exceptional dead in Northern Vietnam. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 38 (8), 515–540.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mandair, Arvind-Pal S. (2009). Religion and the specter of the West: Sikhism, India, postcoloniality, and the politics of translation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mbembe, A. (1992). The banality of power and the aesthetics of vulgarity in the postcolony. Public Culture, 4 (2),1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Migdal, J. S. (1994). The State in society: An approach to struggles for domination. In J. S. Migdal, A. Kohli & V. Shue (Eds.), State power and social forces: Domination and transformation in the third world (pp. 5–34). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nguyễn Nhã. (1975). Đặc Khảo về Hoàng sa và Trường Sa [Solid research on the Paracel and Spratly]. Sử Địa 29 (1–3), 258–273.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ninh, Kim N.B. (2002). A World of political transformed: The politics of culture in revolutionary Vietnam, 1945–1965. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ortner, S. B. (1995). Resistance and the problem of ethnographic refusal. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 37 (1), 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ortner, S. B. (2006). Anthropology and social theory: Culture, power and the acting subject. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pelley, P. M. (2002). Postcolonial Vietnam: New histories of the national past. Durkham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pham, Quynh Phuong. (2009). Hero and deity: Tran Hung Dao and the resurgence of popular religion in Vietnam. Chiang Mai: Mekong Press.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Roszko, E. (2010). Commemoration and the state: Memory and legitimacy in Vietnam. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, Vol. 25. no. 1, pp.1–28.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Salemink, O. (2007). The Emperor’s new clothes: Re-fashioning ritual in the Huế festival. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 38 (3), 559–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Salemink, O. (2008). Spirits of consumption and the capitalist ethic in Vietnam. In P. Kitiarsa (Eds.) Religious commodifications in Asia: Marketing gods (pp. 147–168). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Salemink, O. (forthcoming). Appropriating culture: The politics of intangible cultural heritage in Vietnam. In Hue-Tam Ho Tai & M. Sidel (Eds.) Property and power: State, society and market in Vietnam. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sutherland, C. (2005). Nation-building through discourse theory. Nations and Nationalism, 11 (2), 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sutherland, C. (2006). Calculated conviction: Contemporary nationalist ideology and strategy. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 6 (1), 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Taylor, P. (2001). Fragments of the present: Searching for modernity in Vietnam's South. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Taylor, P. (2007). Modernity and re-enchantment: Religion in post-revolutionary Vietnam (pp. 194–220). Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Trần, Quốc Vượng. (1992). Popular culture and high culture in Vietnamese history. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 7 (2), 5–38.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Trần, Quốc Vượng. (1995). The legend of Ông Dóng from the text to the field. In K. W. Taylor & J. Whitmore (Eds.) Essays into Vietnamese Pasts (pp.13-41). New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Truong, Huyen Chi. (2001). Changing processes of social reproduction in the Northern Vietnam countryside: An Ethnographic study of Đồng Vàng village (Red River Delta). Ph.D. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Truong, Huyen Chi. (2004). Winter Crop and spring festival: The contestations of local government in a Red River Delta commune. In Benedict J. Kerkvliet Tria & D. G. Marr, Beyond Hanoi: Local Government in Vietnam (pp.110-136). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Van der Veer, P. & Lehmann, H. (1999). Nation and religion: Perspectives on Europe and Asia. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Weber, M. (2004). The vocation lectures. D. Owen & T. B. Strong (Eds.) Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Whitmore, J. K. (1980). Bureaucratic control of the spirits in Vietnam. Association of Asian Studies, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Whitmore, J. K. (1984). Social organization and Confucian thought in Vietnam. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 15 (2), 296–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Wolters, O. W. (1988). Two essays on Đại-Việt in the fourteenth century. New Heaven CT: Council of Southeast Asian Studies, Yale Centre for International and Area Studies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Social AnthropologyHalleGermany

Personalised recommendations