Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Late Victorian and Edwardian Views of Rome and the Nature of “Defensive Imperialism”

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of the Classical Tradition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, E. 2005. The “Enemy” Speaks: Oratory and Criticism of Empire in Roman Historiography. Diss. Duke University.

  • ——. 2006. “Who’s Anti-Roman? Sallust and Pompeius Trogus on Mithridates.” Classical Journal 101: 383–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badian, E. 1958. Foreign Clientelae (264–70 BC). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1968. Roman Imperialism in the Late Republic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, R.F. 1971. “The Allusion to Rome in British Imperial Thought of the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries.” Victorian Studies 15: 149–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, E.R. 1910. “Greeks and Barbarians.” Classical Review 24: 109–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blagg, T. and M. Millett, eds. 1990. The Early Roman Empire in the West. Oxford: Oxbow Books.

  • Brunt, P.A. 1965. “Reflections on British and Roman Imperialism.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 7: 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1978. “Laus Imperii.” In Garnsey and Whittaker (1978a), pp. 159–91.

  • Bryce, J. 1913. The Ancient Roman Empire and the British Empire in India; The Diffusion of Roman English Law throughout the World: Two Historical Studies. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butlin, R.A. 2004. “Lucas, Sir Charles Prestwood (1853–1931).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography v. 34: 670.

  • Cain, P., ed. 1999. Empire and Imperialism: The Debates of the 1870s. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, M.E. 1972. “Lord Cromer’s ‘Ancient and Modern Imperialism’: A Proconsular View of Empire.” Journal of British Studies 12: 61–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramb, J.A. 1900. Reflections on the Origins and Destiny of Imperial Britain. London: Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromer, E. Baring, Earl of. 1910a. Ancient and Modern Imperialism. London: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1910b. “History and Politics.” Classical Review 24: 114–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1913. Political and Literary Essays: 1908–1913. London: Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curzon, G.N. Curzon, Marquis of. 1908. “The True Imperialism.” The Nineteenth Century and After 63: 151–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, J.G. 2004. “Baring, Evelyn, the First Earl of Cromer (1841–1917).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography v. 3: 821–827.

  • Davidson, J.L.S. 1910. “Roman Republic.” Classical Review 24: 107–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Souza, P. 1996. “’They Are All the Enemies of Mankind’: Justifying Roman Imperialism in the Late Republic.” In Webster and Cooper (1996), pp. 125–33.

  • Dyson, S. 1985. The Creation of the Roman Frontier. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eadie, J.W. 1977. “Peripheral Vision in Roman History: Strengths and Weaknesses of the Comparative Appraoch.” In Ancient and Modern: Essays in Honor of Gerald F. Else, edited by J.H. D’Arms and J.W. Eadie. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Pp. 215–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Errington, R.M. 1972. The Dawn of Empire: Rome’s Rise to World Power. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero, G. 1914. Ancient Rome and Modern America: A Comparative Study of Morals and Manners. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— and C. Barbagallo. 1918. A Short History of Rome: The Monarchy and the Republic. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, G. 1999. “Poverty or Power? The Native Response to Roman Rule in the Fenland.” In TRAC 98: Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, edited by P. Baker, C. Forcey, S. Jundi, and R. Witcher. Oxford: Oxbow Books. Pp. 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2001. “Writing Colonial Conflict, Acknowledging Colonial Weakness.” In TRAC 2000: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, edited by G. Davies, A. Gardner, and K. Lockyear. Oxford: Oxbow Books. Pp. 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forcey, C. 1997. “Beyond ‘Romanization’: Technologies of Power in Roman Britain.” In TRAC 96: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, edited by K. Meadows, C. Lemke, and J. Heron. Oxford: Oxbow Books. Pp. 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, T. 1909. “A Chapter in the Story of Roman Imperialism.” Classical Philology 4: 118–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1910. “Commercialism and Roman Territorial Expansion.” Classical Journal 5: 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1912. “The Import of the Fetial Institution.” Classical Philology 7: 335–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1929. Roman Imperialism. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden, M. 2004. “Robertson, John Mackinnon (1856–1933).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography v. 47: 248–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, P.[W.M.] 1996. “British Imperialism and the Roman Empire.” In Webster and Cooper (1996), pp. 19–34.

  • ——. 1997a. “Mommsen to Haverfield: The Origins of Studies of Romanization in late 19th–c. Britain.” In Mattingly (1997a), pp. 27–50.

  • ——. 1997b. “‘Romanization—Imperialism’: What Are We Talking About?” In TRAC 96: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, edited by K. Meadows, C. Lemke, and J. Heron. Oxford: Oxbow Books. Pp. 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frézouls, E. 1983. “Sur l’historiographie de l’impérialisme romain.” Ktema 8: 141–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froude, J.A. 1886. Oceana or England and Her Colonies. London: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey, P.D.A. and C.R. Whittaker, eds. 1978a. Imperialism in the Ancient World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1978b. “Introduction.” In Garnsey and Whittaker (1978a), pp. 1–6.

  • Gilmour, D. 1994. Curzon. London: J. Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2004. “Curzon, George Nathaniel, Marquess Curzon of Kedleston (1859–1925).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography v. 14: 792–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goff, B., ed. 2005. Classics and Colonialism. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, E.H.H. 1999. “Gentlemanly capitalism and British economic policy, 1880–1914: the debate over bimetallism and protectionism.” In Gentlemanly Capitalism and British Imperialism: The New Debate on Empire, edited by R.E. Dumett. London and New York: Longman. Pp. 44–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruen, E.S. 1970. “Introduction.” In Imperialism in the Roman Republic, edited by E.S. Gruen. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston. Pp. 1–10.

  • Hammond, M. 1948. “Ancient Imperialism: Contemporary Justifications.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 58: 105–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1961. “Ancient Rome and Modern America Reconsidered.” Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society 73: 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, W.S. 1997. “Forces of Change and Methods of Control.” In Mattingly (1997a), pp. 67–80.

  • Harris, W.V. 1971. “On War and Greed in the Second Century B.C.” American Historical Review 76: 1371–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1979. War and Imperialism in Republican Rome: 327–70 BC. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, T. 2005. “Through British Eyes: The Athenian Empire and Modern Historiography.” In Goff (2005), pp. 25–37.

  • Harvey, P.D.A. 2004. “Seebohm, Frederic (1833–1912).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography v. 49: 663–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haverfield, F. 1910. “Introduction, Roman Empire.” Classical Review 24: 105–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1911. “An Inaugural Address Delivered Before the First Annual General Meeting of the Society, 11th May.” Journal of Roman Studies 1: xi–xx.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1915 (1910). The Romanization of Roman Britain, 3rd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hingley, R. 1991. “Past Present and Future—the Study of the Roman Period in Britain.” Scottish Archaeological Review 8: 90–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1993. “Attitudes to Roman Imperialism.” In Theoretical Roman Archaeology: First Conference Proceedings, edited by E. Scott. Aldershot: Avebury. Pp. 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1994. “Britannia, Origin Myths and the British Empire.” In TRAC 94: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, edited by S. Cottam, D. Dungworth, S. Scott, and J. Taylor. Oxford: Oxbow Books. Pp. 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1996. “The ‘Legacy’ of Rome: The Rise, Decline, and Fall of the Theory of Romanization.” In Webster and Cooper (1996), pp. 35–48.

  • ——. 1997. “Resistance and Domination: Social Change in Roman Britain.” In Mat214 International Journal of the Classical Tradition / June 2008 tingly (1997a), pp. 81–100.

  • ——. 2000. Roman Officers and English Gentlemen: The Imperial Origins of Roman Archaeology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2001. “An Imperial Legacy: The Contribution of Classical Rome to the Character of the English.” In Images of Rome: Perceptions of Ancient Rome in Europe and the United States in the Modern Age, edited by R. Hingley, Journal of Roman Archaeology, Suppl. ser. 44. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology. Pp. 145–165.

  • ——. 2005. Globalizing Roman Culture: Unity, Diversity and Empire. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2007. “Francis John Haverfield (1860–1919): Oxford, Roman Archaeology and Edwardian Imperialism.” In Oxford Classics: Teaching and Learning 1800–2000, edited by C. Stray. London: Duckworth. Pp. 135–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, D.G. 1910. “Assimilation.” Classical Review 24: 112–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holleaux, M. 1921. Rome, la Grèce et les monarchies hellénistiques au IIIe siècle avant J.-C. (273–205). Paris: E. de Boccard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, K. 1978. Conquerors and Slaves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, B. 1992. The Limits of Empire: The Roman Army in the East. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2004. The Invention of Racism in Classical Antiquity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jal, P. 1982. “L’impérialisme romain: Observations sur les témoignages littéraires latins de la fin de la République romaine.” Ktema 7: 143–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, V.T. 1999/2000. “Classics and the Acquisition and Validation of Power in Britain’s ‘Imperial Century’ (1815–1914).” International Journal of the Classical Tradition 6: 185–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R. 1999 (1878). “Imperialism.” In Cain (1999), pp. 261–276. = Fortnightly Review n.s. 24 (October 1878): 453–465.

  • Lucas, C.P. 1912. Greater Rome and Greater Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, G. 2004. “Haverfield, Francis John (1860–1919).” Revised by P.W.M. Freeman. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography v. 25: 856–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackail, J.W. 1926. Classical Studies. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majeed, J. 1999. “Comparativism and References to Rome in British Imperial Attitudes to India.” In Roman Presences: Receptions of Rome in European Culture, 1789–1945, edited by C. Edwards. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 88–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, D.J. 1996. “From One Colonialism to Another: Imperialism and the Maghreb.” In Webster and Cooper (1996), pp. 49–49.

  • ——, ed. 1997a. Dialogues in Roman Imperialism: Power, Discourse, and Discrepant Experience in the Roman Empire, Journal of Roman Archaeology, Suppl. ser. 44. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1997b. “Introduction: Dialogues of Power and Experience in the Roman Empire.” In Mattingly (1997a), pp. 7–24.

  • McCoskey, D. 2006/07. “Naming the Fault in Question: Theorizing Racism among the Greeks and Romans.” International Journal of the Classical Tradition 13: 243–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, G.B. 1990. “Roman and Modern Imperialism: A Reassessment.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 32: 629–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millett, M. 1990. “Romanization: Historical Issues and Archaeological Interpretation.” In Blagg and Millett (1990), pp. 35–41.

  • Mommsen, T. 1894. The History of Rome, vol. 4, translated by W.P. Dickson. NewYork: Scribner.

  • Murray, G. 1900. “The Exploitation of the Inferior Races in Ancient and Modern Times.” In Liberalism and the Empire: Three Essays, by F.W. Hirst, G. Murray, and J.L. Hammond. London: R. Brimley Johnson. Pp. 118–157.

  • Nicolet, C. 1983 “L’Empire romain: espace, temps et politique.” Ktema 8:163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, J.A. 1981. “The Development of Roman Imperialism.” Journal of Roman Studies 71: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R. 2004. Lord Cromer: Victorian Imperialist, Edwardian Proconsul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, J. 2004. “Lowe, Robert, Viscount Sherbrooke (1811–1892).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography v. 34: 575–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D.M. 2002. Whose Pharaohs? Archaeology, Museums, and Egyptian National Identity from Napoleon to World War I. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J.M. 1998 (1899). Patriotism and Empire. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E.W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1993. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seebohm, F. 1999 (1880). “Imperialism and Socialism.” In Cain (1999), pp. 297–310. = The Nineteenth Century 7 (1880), pp. 726–736.

  • Seeley, J.R. 1871. Roman Imperialism and Other Lectures and Essays. Boston: Roberts Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1971 (1883). The Expansion of England, edited by J. Gross. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, R.T. 2004. “Seeley, Sir John Robert (1834–1895).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography v. 49: 668–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearn, R.T. 2004. “Cramb [Cram], John Adam (1861–1913).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography v. 13: 976–977.

  • Stray, C. 2004. “Murray, (George) Gilbert Aimé (1866–1957).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography v. 39: 912–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symonds, R. 1986. Oxford and Empire: The Last Lost Cause? New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, F.M. 1986. “British Politics and the Demise of the Roman Republic: 1700–1939.” Historical Journal 29: 577–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance, N. 1997. The Victorians and Ancient Rome. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasunia, P. 2003. “Hellenism and Empire: Reading Edward Said.” Parallax 9.4: 88–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2005. “Greater Rome and Greater Britain.” In Goff (2005), pp. 38–64.

  • Walbank, F.W. 1963. “Polybius and Rome’s Eastern Policy.” Journal of Roman Studies 53: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, A. 1964. “The Tory View of Roman History.” Studies in English Literature 1500–1900 4: 413–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G. 1993 (1978). Boudica: The British Revolt against Rome AD 60. London: Batsford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. 1996a. “Roman Imperialism and the ‘Post Imperial Age.’” In Webster and Cooper (1996), pp. 1–17.

  • ——. 1996b. “Ethnographic Barbarity: Colonial Discourse and ‘Celtic Warrior Societies.’” In Webster and Cooper (1996), pp. 111–23.

  • —— and N. Cooper, eds. 1996. Roman Imperialism: Post-Colonial Perspectives. Leicester: School of Archaeological Studies, University of Leicester.

  • Whittaker, C.R. 1997. “Imperialism and Culture: The Roman Initiative.” In Mattingly (1997a), pp. 143–63.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Classics, Connecticut College, Box 5291, 270 Mohegan Avenue, New London, CT, 06320, US

    Eric Adler

Authors
  1. Eric Adler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

I would like to thank Prof. Wolfgang Haase and the anonymous referees for the International Journal of the Classical Tradition, who provided many useful suggestions and criticisms that improved this article. Thanks are also due to an audience at Boston College, which heard an earlier version of a portion of this paper’s argument and offered a number of valuable comments. I would also like to thank Profs. Richard Moorton, Oliver Nicholson, and Jeffrey Stackert, who read earlier drafts of the essay and provided helpful recommendations. Any errors of fact or judgment are my own.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adler, E. Late Victorian and Edwardian Views of Rome and the Nature of “Defensive Imperialism”. Int class trad 15, 187–216 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12138-009-0037-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12138-009-0037-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation