Acta Analytica

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 175–194 | Cite as

Expressivism about Knowledge and the Value of Knowledge

Article

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to state a version of epistemic expressivism regarding knowledge, and to suggest how this expressivism about knowledge explains the value of knowledge. The paper considers how an account of the value of knowledge based on expressivism about knowledge responds to the Meno Problem, the Swamping Problem, and a variety of other questions that pertains to the value of knowledge, and the role of knowledge in our cognitive ecology.

Keywords

Value of knowledge Epistemic expressivism The Meno Problem The swamping problem The value problem Inquiry 

References

  1. Blackburn, S., (1996) Securing the nots: moral epistemology for the quasi-realist. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong & M. Timmons. Moral Knowledge. New Readings in Moral Epistemology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chrisman, M. (2007). From epistemic contextualism to epistemic expressivism. Philosophical Studies, 135, 225–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chrisman, M., (2009) From epistemic expressivism to epistemic inferentialism. In Adrian Haddock, Duncan Pritchard and Alan Millar (Ed.), Social epistemology. Oxford University Press, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  4. Cuneo, T. (2007). The Normative Web: An Argument for Moral Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Field, H. (1998). Epistemological nonfactualism and the a prioricity of logic. Philosophical Studies, 92(1–2), 1–24.Google Scholar
  6. Field, H. (2009). Epistemology without metaphysics. Philosophical Studies, 143, 249–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gibbard, A. (1990). Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgement. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  8. Gibbard, A. (2003). Thinking How to Live. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Goldman, A. I., & Olsson, E. J, (2009) Reliabilism and the value of knowledge. In D. Pritchard (Ed.), Epistemic Value. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Heller, M. (1999) The proper role for contextualism in an anti-luck epistemology. Nous, 115–129.Google Scholar
  11. Kaplan, M. (1985). It’s not what you know that counts. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(7), 350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaplan, M. (2003). Critical study: who cares what you know? The Philosophical Quarterly, 53(210), 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kvanvig, J. L. (2003). The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding, Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lynch, M. (2009). Truth, Value and Epistemic Expressivism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXXIX, 1, 76–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pritchard, D., Millar, A., Haddock A. (2009) The Nature and Value of Knowledge: Three Investigations: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  16. Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Zagzebski, L. (2003). The search for the source of epistemic good. Metaphilosophy, 34(1–2), 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section of Philosophy, Department of Media, Cognition and CommunicationUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations