Within the context of the transformation of work, mobility turns into a characteristic of contemporary (work-)lives and a pre-requisite for career biographies. High-skilled migrants who are employed in academia, IT or engineering increasingly incorporate the mobility demands of their ‘mobilised professions’. This paper examines how mobile professionals relate to their current place of residence, what kind of frictions they face and what forms of (alternative) belonging they develop in response. In doing so, the paper links ideas from governmentality studies with recent work from migration studies and the spatial sciences. Our analysis draws on interviews with high-skilled migrants in Manchester (UK). While broadly accepting the mobility demands of their respective fields of work without questioning, their resulting mobile practices often undermine the development of a sense of belonging based on place attachment and local social interaction. Our empirical material suggests that this potential conflict is mediated through the constitution of a group of ‘internationals’ who share mobile biographies and the experience of in-betweenness. Based on our findings, we suggest three directions for future research: to focus on the relational aspects of place ties, to investigate the role of the workplace and more specifically the employer, and to explore how places shape differential politics of belonging.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Ahmed, S. (1999). Home and away: Narratives of migration and estrangement. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2(3), 329–347.
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
Bauder, H. (2012). The international mobility of academics: A labour market perspective. International Migration, 53(1), 83–96.
Beck, U. (2011). Cosmopolitanism as imagined Communities of global Risk. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(10), 1346–1361.
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.
Brickell, K., & Datta, A. (Eds.). (2011). Translocal geographies—spaces, places, connections. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.
Bröckling, U. (2016). The entrepreneurial self. Fabricating a new type of subject. London: Sage.
Cantwell, B. (2011). Transnational mobility and international academic employment: Gatekeeping in an academic competition arena. Minerva, 49(4), 425–445.
Chandler, D., & Reid, J. (2016). The neoliberal subject—resilience, adaptation and vulnerability. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Colic-Peisker, V. (2010). Free floating in the cosmopolis? Exploring the identity-belonging of transnational knowledge workers. Global Networks, 10(4), 467–488.
Collins, F. L. (2012). Transnational mobilities an urban spatialities: Notes from the Asia-Pacific. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3), 316–335.
Dahinden, J. (2013). Cities, migrant incorporation, and ethnicity: A network perspective on boundary work. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 14(1), 39–60.
Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality. Power and rule in modern society. Los Angeles: Sage.
Dowling, R. (2008). Geographies of identity: Labouring in the ‘neoliberal’ university. Progress in Human Geography, 32(6), 812–820.
Glick Schiller, N., & Çağlar, A. (2011). Locating migration: Rescaling cities and migrants. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Gordon, E., & De Souza e Silva, A. (2011). Net locality: Why location matters in a networked world. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ho, E. L. (2011). Migration trajectories of ‘highly skilled’ middling transnationals: Singaporean Transmigrants in London. Population, Space and Place, 17(1), 116–129.
Iredale, R. (2001). The migration of professionals: Theories and typologies. International Migration, 39(1), 7–24.
Jöns, H. (2009). ‘Brain circulation’ and transnational knowledge networks: Studying long-term effects of academic mobility to Germany, 1954-2000. Global Networks, 9(3), 315–338.
Kennedy, P. (2007). Global transformations and local ‘bubble’ lives: Taking a reality check on some globalization concepts. Globalizations, 4(2), 267–283.
Kesselring, S. (2014). Corporate mobility regimes. Mobility, power and the socio-geographical structurations of mobile work. Mobilities, 10(4), 571–591.
Kesselring, S., & Vogl, G. (2010). Betriebliche Mobilitätsregime. Die sozialen Kosten mobiler Arbeit. Berlin: Edition sigma.
Khoo, S. E., Voigt-Graf, C., McDonald, P., & Hugo, G. (2007). Temporary skilled migration to Australia: Employers’ perspectives. International Migration, 45(4), 175–201.
Knott, E. (2017). Nationalism and belonging: Introduction. Nations and Nationalism, 23(2), 220–226.
Koser, K., & Salt, J. (1997). The geography of highly skilled international migration. International Journal of Population Geography, 3(4), 285–303.
Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.
Larner, W., & Walters, W. (2004). Globalization as governmentality. Alternatives, 29(5), 495–514.
Lemke, T. (2000). Neoliberalismus, Staat und Selbsttechnologien. Ein kritischer Überblick über die governmentality studies. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 41(1), 31–47.
Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207–230.
Ley, D. (2004). Transnational spaces and everyday lives. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29, 151–164.
Lusis, T., & Bauder, H. (2011). Migration and labour markets: An interpretation of the literature. In K. Townsend & A. Wilkinson (Eds.), Research handbook on the future of work and employment relations (pp. 212–229). Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar.
Mahroum, S. (2000). Highly skilled globetrotters: Mapping the international migration of human capital. R&D Management, 30(1), 13–31.
Mee, K., & Wright, S. (2009). Geographies of belonging—guest editorial. Environment and Planning A, 41(4), 772–779.
Meier, L. (Ed.). (2015). Migrant professionals in the city. Local encounters, identities and inequalities. New York: Routledge.
Millar, J., & Salt, J. (2006). In whose interests? IT migration in an interconnected world economy. Population, Space and Place, 13(1), 41–58.
Musterd, S., & Gritsai, O. (2013). The creative knowledge city in Europe: Structural conditions and urban policy strategies for competitive cities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(3), 343–359.
Nowicka, M. (2007). Mobile locations: Construction of home in a group of mobile transnational professionals. Global Networks, 7(1), 69–86.
Ong, A. (2007). Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 3–8.
Ong, A., & Nonini, D. (Eds.). (1997). Ungrounded empires: The cultural politics of modern Chinese transnationalism. New York: Routledge.
Peck, J., & Ward, K. (2002). Placing Manchester. In J. Peck & K. Ward (Eds.), City of revolution: Re-structuring Manchester (pp. 1–17). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Raghuram, P. (2014). Brain circulation or precarious labour? Conceptualizing temporariness in the United Kingdom’s National Health Service. In L. F. Vosko, V. Preston, & R. Latham (Eds.), Liberating temporariness? Migration, work, and citizenship in an age of insecurity (pp. 177–200). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Scott, S. (2013). Migration and the employer perspective: Pitfalls and potentials for a future research agenda. Population, Space and Place, 19, 703–713.
Tomaney, J. (2014). Region and place 2: Belonging. Progress in Human Geography, 38(1), 131–140.
Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Van Bochove, M., & Engbersen, G. (2015). Beyond cosmopolitanism and expat bubbles: Challenging dominant representations of knowledge workers and trailing spouses. Population, Space and Place, 21, 295–309.
Van Riemsdijk, M. (2014). International migration and local emplacement: Everyday place-making practices of skilled migrants in Oslo, Norway. Environment and Planning A, 46(4), 963–979.
Vincent-Geslin, S., & Ravalet, E. (2015). Socialisation to high mobility? In G. Viry & V. Kaufmann (Eds.), High mobility in Europe. Work and personal life (pp. 59–82). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227–252.
Williams, A. M., & Baláž, V. (2008). International migration and knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.
Williams, S., Bradley, H., Devadason, R., & Erickson, M. (2013). Globalization and work. Cambridge: Polity.
Yeoh, B. S. A. (2005). Observations on transnational urbanism: Possibilities, politics and costs of simultaneity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(2), 409–431.
Yeoh, B. S. A., & Willis, K. (2005). Singaporean and British transmigrants in China and the cultural politics of ‘contact zones’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(2), 269–285.
Young, C., Diep, M., & Drabble, S. (2006). Living with difference? The ‘Cosmopolitan City’ and urban reimaging in Manchester, UK. Urban Studies, 43(10), 1687–1714.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice, 40(3), 197–214.
About this article
Cite this article
Plöger, J., Kubiak, S. Becoming ‘the Internationals’—how Place Shapes the Sense of Belonging and Group Formation of High-Skilled Migrants. Int. Migration & Integration 20, 307–321 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-018-0608-7
- High-skilled migrants
- Labour mobility
- Social integration
- Entrepreneurial self