Invisible Borders of the City for the Migrant Women From Turkey: Gendered Use of Urban Space and Place Making in Cinisello/Milan

  • Semra PurkisEmail author


Policies to overcome the deepening world economic crisis trigger movement of people around the world. Migrants flow into the deprived areas of cities and become constitutive components of these places. The use of urban space for international migrants is restricted. But these restrictions of the space that is experienced and felt in daily life by different disadvantaged groups and genders can differ to a great extent. This study tries to do a gender specific analysis of use of the urban space through the experiences of women migrants from Turkey in Cinisello Balsamo/Milan and attempts to indicate how space, which is constructed, reproduced, and transformed constantly by changing social relations and interactions, can mold, reproduce, and change these relations in turn.


Women migrants from Turkey Gendered use of urban space Urban poverty Place making Milan Cinisello-Balsamo 



I would like to thank all the interviewees for their invaluable contributions, which made this study possible.


  1. Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: the geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, J., & Cochrane, A. (2007). Beyond the territorial fix: regional assemblages, politics and power. Regional Studies, 41, 1161–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, J., Massey, D., & Cochrane, A. (1998). Re-thinking the region. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Amin, A. (2002). Spatialities of globalisation. Environment and Planning A, 34, 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amin, A. (2004). Regions unbound: towards a new politics of place. Geografiska Annaler, 86B, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amin, A. (2007). Re-thinking the urban social. City, 11(1), 100–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2005). Citizens of the world: seeing the city as a site of international influence. Harvard International Review, 27, 14–17.Google Scholar
  8. Andall, J. (2013). Gendered mobilities and work in Europe: an introduction. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(4), 525–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Anthias, F. & Lazaridis, G. (2000). On the move: gender and migration in Southern Europe. In F. Anthias & G. Lazaridis (Eds), Gender and migration in Southern Europe (pp. 1–13). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  10. Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: the human consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Boyle, P., & Halfacree, K. (Eds.). (2005). Migration and gender in the developed world. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Brettel, C. B., & Hollifield, J. F. (2000). Migration theory: talking across disciplines. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Calvaresi, C., & Carmichael, L. (2005). Building local coalitions for global challenges: Urban leaders and community involvement in urban regeneration projects in England and Italy. Accessed 10 April 2016.
  14. Castles, S., & Miller, J. M. (2003). The age of migration: international population movements in the modern world. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Chant, S., & McIlwaine, C. (2013). Gender, urban development and the politics of space. Accessed 15 Feb 2016.
  16. Ciommo, D. F. (2001). The economic actors and city governability: the example of urban regeneration policies in Milan, Naples and Paris. In: International Conference on Area-based Initiatives in Contemporary Urban Policy, Copenhagen: 17–19 May.Google Scholar
  17. Doel, M. (2007). Book review, post-structuralist geography: a guide to relational space, by Jonathan Murdoch. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97, 809–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Erel, U., & Lutz, H. (2012). Gender and transnationalism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 19(4), 409–412. Accessed 10 March 2016.
  19. Farías, I., & Bender, T. (Eds.). (2010). Urban assemblages: how actor-network theory changes urban studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Fenster, T. (1999). Space for gender: cultural roles of the forbidden and the permitted. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17, 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fenster, T. (2005). The right to the gendered city: different formations of belonging in everyday life. Journal of Gender Studies, 14(3), 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gardner, K. (2009). Lives in motion: the life-course, movement and migration in Bangladesh. Journal of South Asian Development, 4(2), 229–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaugh, J., Eisenschitz, A., & McCulloch, A. (2006). Spaces of social exclusion. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Gottmann, J. (1973). The significance of territory. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hardill, I. (2002). Gender, migration and the dual career household. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harvey, D. (2009). Cosmopolitanism and the geographies of freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jarvis, H., Kantor, P., & Cloke, J. (2009). Cities and gender. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnston, R. J. (1991). A question of place: exploring the practice of human geography. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Jones, M. (2009). Phase space: geography, relational thinking, and beyond. Progress in Human Geography, 33(4), 487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaplan, D. H. (1998). Territorial identities and geographical scale. In G. H. Herb & D. H. Kaplan (Eds.), Nested identities: nationalism, territory and scale (pp. 31–49). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  31. Kaplan, D. H., & Hakli, J. (Eds.). (2002). Introduction. In: Boundaries and place: European Borderleands in geographical context (pp. 1–17). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  32. Kofman, E. (1999). Female ‘birds of passage’ a decade later: gender and immigration in the European Union. International Migration Review, 33, 269–299.Google Scholar
  33. Kofman, E., Phizacklea, A., Raughuram, P., & Sales, R. (2005). Gender and international migration in Europe: employment, welfare and politics. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kok, J. (2007). Principles and prospects of the life course paradigm. Annales de Démographie Historique, 113, 203–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kwan, M. P. (2000). Gender differences in space-time constraints. Area, 32(2), 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lenz, I., Lutz, H., Morokvasic, M., Schöning-Kalender, C., & Schwenken, H. (Eds.). (2002). Crossing borders and shifting boundaries, Gender, identities and networks (vol.II). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  37. Lutz, H. (2007). The ‘intimate others’—migrant domestic workers in Europe. In B. Erik, L. Branka, T. Gülay, & T. Trimikliniotis (Eds.), Irregular migration, informal labour and community: a challenge for Europe (pp. 226–241). Maastricht: Shaker Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. Lutz, H. (2010). Gender in the migratory process. Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10), 1647–1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mann, M. (2003). The autonomous power of the state: its origins, mechanisms and results. In N. Brenner, B. Jessop, M. Jones, & M. G. MacLeod (Eds.), State/space: a reader (pp. 53–64). Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marzorati, R., & Quassoli, F. (2012). “Risotto and Zighiní?”. Milano’s Lazzaretto between multicultural changes and perceptions of insecurity. In V. Aytar & J. Rath (Eds.), Selling ethnic neighbourhoods: the rise of neighbourhoods as places of leisure and consumption (pp. 138–155). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Massey, D. (1994). Space, place, and gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  42. Massey, D. (2004). Geographies of responsibility. Geografiska Annaler, 86B, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and critical urban praxis. City, 15(3/4), 204–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Momsen, J. H. (2005). Maids on the move. In J. H. Momsen (Ed.), Gender, migration and domestic service (pp. 1–20). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Morokvasic, M. (1983). Women in migration: beyond the reductionist outlook. In A. Phizacklea (Ed.), One way ticket: migration and female labour (pp. 13–31). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  46. Morokvasic, M. (1984). Birds of passage are also women. International Migration Review, 18(4), 886–907.Google Scholar
  47. Morokvasic, M. (2003). Transnational mobility and gender: a view from post-wall Europe, Crossing borders and shifting boundaries I. In M. Morokvasic, U. Erel, & K. Shinozaki (Eds.), Gender on the move (pp. 101–133). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  48. Morokvasic, M. (2004). Settled in mobility: engendering post-wall migration in Europe. Feminist Review, 77(1), 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Morokvasic, M. (2007). Migration, gender, empowerment. In I. Lenz, C. Ullrich, & B. Fersch (Eds.), Gender orders unbound. Globalisation, restructuring and reciprocity (pp. 69–97). Opladen and Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers.Google Scholar
  50. Morokvasic, M., Erel, U., & Shinozaki, K. (Eds.). (2003). Crossing borders and shifting boundaries 1: gender on the move. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  51. Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ong, A., & Collier, S. (Eds.). (2005). Global assemblages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  53. Paasi, A. (2004). Place and region: looking through the prism of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 536–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Parreñas, R. (2001). Servants of globalization: women, migration and domestic work. Standford and California: Standford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Phizacklea, A. (1983). Introduction. In A. Phizacklea (Ed.), One way ticket. Migration and female labour (pp. 1–13). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  56. Prescott, J. R. V. (1987). Political frontiers and boundaries. London: Unwin and Hyman.Google Scholar
  57. Price, M., & Benton, L. S. (Eds.). (2008). Migrants to the metropolis: the rise of immigrant gateway cities. Syracuse and New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Purkis, S., & Güngör, F. (2017). Drifting here and there but going nowhere: the case of migrants from Turkey in Milan in the era of global economic crisis. International Migration & Integration, 18(2), 439–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rankin, K. N. (2011). Assemblage and the politics of thick description. City, 15(5), 563–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Reyes, P. (2002). Women and migrants: continuity and change in patterns of female migration in Latin America. In P. Sharpe (Ed.), Women, gender and labour migration: historical and global perspective (pp. 139–155). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Robinson, J. (2004). In the tracks of comparative urbanism: difference, urban modernity and the primitive. Urban Geography, 25(8), 709–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Robinson, J. (2005). Ordinary cities: between modernity and development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Sack, R. D. (1981). Territorial bases of power. In A. D. Burnett & P. J. Taylor (Eds.), Political studies from spatial perspectives (pp. 53–71). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  64. Sack, R. D. (1986). Human territoriality: its theory and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Sassen, S. (1988). The mobility of labour and capital: a study in international investment and labour flow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sassen, S. (Ed.). (2002). Global networks, linked cities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Sassen, S. (2003). The feminization of survival: alternative global circuits. In M. Morokvasic, U. Erel, & K. Shinozaki (Eds.), Crossing borders and shifting boundaries I: gender on the move (pp. 59–77). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sassen, S. (2008). Territory, authority, rights; from medieval to global assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Schiller, N. G., & Çağlar, A. (2009). Towards a comparative theory of locality in migration studies: migrant incorporation and city scale. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(2), 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schireup, C., Hansen, P., & Castles, S. (2006). Migration, citizenship and the European welfare state: a European dilemma. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Scudo, G., & Dessi, V. (2006). Thermal comfort in urban space renewal. Paper presented at the 23. International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Geneva/Switzerland, September. Accessed 21 Feb 2016.
  72. Sharpe, P. (Ed.). (2002). Women, gender and labour migration: historical and global perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Taylor, P. J. (2003). The state as container: territoriality in the modern world-system. In N. Brenner, B. Jessop, M. Jones, & G. MacLeod (Eds.), State/space: a reader (pp. 101–113). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tornaghi, C. (2007a). Implementing the urban Italia regeneration programme in Cinisello Balsamo (Milan): change and continuity in the pattern of local governance. Journal Für Entwicklungspolitik, XXIII, 1, 75–97.Google Scholar
  75. Tornaghi, C. (2007b). Whose public spaces? Neighbourhood renewal, conviviality and. place making in the Milan urban fringe, In: 10th EURA Conference The Vital City, Glasgow (UK), 12th–14th September 2007, Accessed 13 Feb 2016.
  76. Townsend, P. (1993). The international analysis of poverty. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  77. Urry, J. (2000). The global media and cosmopolitanism. Lancaster: The Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, Accessed 15 April 2016.
  78. Urry, J. (2002). Mobility and proximity. Sociology, 36(2), 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  80. Wacquant, L. (2007). Urban outcasts, a comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsMuğla Sıtkı Koçman UniversityMuğlaTurkey

Personalised recommendations