Advertisement

Journal of International Migration and Integration

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 1271–1287 | Cite as

Rights and Restrictions: Temporary Agricultural Migrants and Trade Unions’ Activism in Canada and Spain

  • Tanya Basok
  • Ana López-Sala
Article

Abstract

In the last two decades, temporary worker programs have experienced an unprecedented expansion as instruments of what is defined as the migration management approach. Various migrant rights activists have voiced concerns about the treatment of temporary migrants in these programs and taken initiative to advance their rights. For some migrant rights advocates, it is the temporary nature of migration that is primarily responsible for the rights deficit. Yet, other migrant rights activists accept the temporariness of labour migration while trying to ensure that migrants receive legal protections for their work rights and that these protections are enforced. Trade unions are among the actors who try to protect and advance temporary migrants’ labour rights, but their role in supporting or challenging the principles of temporary migration governance has been neglected in the scholarly literature. The article addresses this gap by highlighting the divergent position of Canadian and Spanish Unions on temporariness of this type of migration. As the article argues, the difference is related to the following four factors: (1) the degree to which the unions in question are institutionally embedded in immigration policy-making, (2) the social environment (that is, discourses on temporariness advanced by other unions and grassroots organizations), (3) the degree of protectionism unions express vis-à-vis new immigrant flows and (4) whether regulated temporary migration is contrasted with permanent or unauthorized migration.

Keywords

Trade unions Temporary agricultural immigrants Immigrant rights Temporary migration governance Canada Spain 

References

  1. Avery, D. (1995). Reluctant host: Canada’s response to immigrant workers, 1896–1994. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
  2. Basok, T. (2002). Tortillas and tomatoes: Mexican transmigrant harvesters in Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Basok, T. (2004). Post-national citizenship, social exclusion, and migrants’ rights: Mexican seasonal workers in Canada. Citizenship Studies, 8(1), 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basok, T., & Carasco, E. (2010). Advancing the rights of noncitizens in Canada: a human rights approach to migrant rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 32(20), 342–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basok, T., & Piper, N. (2013). Justice for migrants: mobilizing a rights-based understanding of migration. In S. Ilcan (Ed.), Mobilities, knowledge, and social justice (pp. 162–184). Otawa: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Basok, T., Bélanger, D., & Rivas, E. (2013). Reproducing deportability: migrant agricultural workers in Southwestern Ontario. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2013.849566.Google Scholar
  7. Betts, A. (2013). The migration industry in global migration governance. In N. Nyberg Sørensen & T. Gammeltoft-Hansen (Eds.), The migration industry and the commercialization of international migration (pp. 45–63). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Binford, L. (2013). Tomorrow we’re all going to the harvest: temporary foreign worker programs and neoliberal political economy. Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  9. Black, D. (2014). New regulations to Temporary Foreign Worker program called a ‘smokescreen’. Toronto Star, Jan 3, www.thestar.com/news/canada/2014/01/03/new_regulations_to_temporary_foreign_worker_program_called_a_smokescreen.html
  10. Bruquetas, M., Garcés, B., Morén, R., Penninx, R., & Ruiz, E. (2011). The case of Spain. In G. Zincone, R. Penninx, & M. Borket (Eds.), Migration policy-making in Europe (pp. 291–323). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Byl, Y. (2009). Entrenching exploitation: second report of AFL temporary foreign worker advocate. Edmonton: Alberta Federation of Labour.Google Scholar
  12. Cachón, L. (1998). Los sindicatos españoles y la inmigración. Migraciones, 4, 71–110.Google Scholar
  13. Cachón, L., & Valles, M. (2003). Trade unionism and immigration: reinterpreting old and new dilemmas. Transfer. The European Review of Labour and Research, 9(3), 469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castles, S., & Kosak, G. (1973). Immigrant workers and class structure in Western Europe. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Castles, S., & Ozkul, D. (2014). Circular migration: triple win, or a new label for temporary migration? In G. Battistella (Ed.), Global and Asian perspectives on international migration (pp. 27–49). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Connolly, H., Marino, S., & Martínez-Lucio, M. (2014). Trade union renewal and the challenges of representation: strategies towards migrants and ethnic minority workers in the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 20(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dauvergne, C., & Marsden, S. (2014a). The ideology of temporary labour migration in the post-global era. Citizenship Studies, 18(2), 224–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dauvergne, C., & Marsden, S. (2014b). Beyond numbers versus rights: shifting the parameters of debate on temporary labour migration. Journal of International of Migration and Integration, 15(3), 525–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Genova, N. (2002). Migrant illegality and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 419–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eldring, L., Fitzgerald, I., & Arnholtz, J. (2012). Post-accession migration in construction and trade union responses in Denmark, Norway and the UK. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 18(1), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elias, J. (2010). Transnational migration, gender and rights: advocacy and activism in the Malaysian context. International Migration, 48(6), 44–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. EUROSTAT. 2015. Eurostast Newsrelease Euroindicators, 98/2015. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  23. Faraday, F. (2012). Made in Canada: how the law constructs migrant workers’ insecurity. Toronto: Metcalf Foundation.Google Scholar
  24. Faraday, F., Fudge, J., & Tucker, E. (Eds.). (2012). Constitutional labour rights in Canada: farm workers and the Fraser case. Toronto: Irwin Law.Google Scholar
  25. Fichter, M. and Greer, I (2004). Analysing social partnership: a tool of union revitalization. In C. Kelly Frege & J. Kelly Frege (Eds.) Varieties of unionism: struggles for union revitalization in a globalizing economy (pp. 71–92). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. FIDH (International Federation for Human Rights) (2012). Report. Importing workers, exporting strawberries. Working conditions on strawberry farms in the Huelva Province (Spain). Paris.Google Scholar
  27. Flecker, K. (2011). Canadian Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP): model or mistake? Ottawa: Canadian Federation of Labour.Google Scholar
  28. Ford, M. (2006). Migrant labour NGOs and trade unions: a partnership in progress? Asian and Pacific Migration Journal: A Quarterly on Human Mobility, 15(3), 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fudge, J., & MacPhail, F. (2009). The temporary foreign worker program in Canada: low-skilled workers as an extreme form of flexible labour. Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal, 31(5), 5–45.Google Scholar
  30. Gabriel, C., & Macdonald, L. (2011). Citizenship at the margins: the Canadian seasonal agricultural worker program and civil society advocacy. Politics & Policy, 39(1), 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geiger, M., & Pécoud, A. (2010). The politics of international migration management. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ghosh, B. (1993). Movements of people. The search for a new international regime. Paper prepared for the Commission on Global Governance. Geneva.Google Scholar
  33. Gouter, D. (2007). Guarding the gates: the Canadian labour movement and immigration, 1872–1934. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  34. Green, A., & Green, D. (2004). The goals of Canada’s immigration policy: a historical perspective. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 13(1), 102–139.Google Scholar
  35. Gualda, E. (2012). Migración circular en tiempos de crisis. Mujeres de Europa del Este y africanas en la agricultura de Huelva. Papers, 97(3), 613–640.Google Scholar
  36. Gyo, C. (2009). Migrant workers in Germany. Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal, 31(1), 47–66.Google Scholar
  37. Hanley, J., Shragge, E., Rivard, A., & Koo, J. (2012). Good enough to work? Good enough to stay! Organizing among temporary foreign workers. In P. T. Lenard & C. Straehle (Eds.), Legislating inequality: Canada’s temporary migrant worker program (pp. 245–271). Otawa: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hawkins, F. (1988). Canada and immigration: public policy and public concern. 2nd ed. Montreal, Quebec: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hellio, E. (2014). We don’t have women in boxes. Channelling seasonal mobility of female farmworkers between Morocco and Andalusia. In J. Gettel & R. Sippel (Eds.), Seasonal workers in Mediterranean agriculture: the social costs of eating fresh (pp. 141–155). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Hennebry, J. & McLaughlin, J. (2012). The exception that proves the rule: structural vulnerability, health risks and consequences for temporary migrant farmworkers in Canada. In Lenard & Straehle, op. cit. 117–138.Google Scholar
  41. Hennebry, J., & Preibisch, K. (2010). A model for managed migration? Re-examining best practices in Canada’s seasonal agricultural worker program. International Migration Review. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2009.00598.x.Google Scholar
  42. Iacovetta, F., Quinlan, M., & Radforth, I. (1996). Immigration and labour: Australia and Canada compared. Labour/Le Travail 38/Labour History, 71, 90–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadística). Encuesta de Población Activa. 2° semestre 2015. Madrid.Google Scholar
  44. Izquierdo, A. (2012). La política de regularizaciones masivas y su función en el modelo migratorio español. In A. Izquierdo & W. Cornelius (Eds.), Políticas de control migratorio. Estudio comparado de España y Estados Unidos (pp. 45–98). Barcelona: Bellaterra.Google Scholar
  45. Kalm, S. (2010). Liberalizing movements? The political rationality of global migration management. In: Geiger & Pécoud (eds.), op.cit. pp 21–44.Google Scholar
  46. Kelley, N. & Trebilcock, M. (2010). The making of the mosaic: a history of Canadian immigration policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lenard, P. T. (2012). How does Canada fare? Canadian temporary labour migration in comparative perspectives. In: Lenard & Straehle (eds), op. cit., pp. 272–296.Google Scholar
  48. López-Sala, A., & Montijano, E. (2014). Contratación en origen de trabajadores latinoamericanos en España: una gestión basada en la flexibilidad. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 106–107, 193–213.Google Scholar
  49. Mannon, S., Petrzelka, S., Glass, C., & Radel, C. (2012). Keeping them in their place: migrant women workers in Spain’s strawberry industry. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 19(1), 83–101.Google Scholar
  50. Marino, S., & Roosblad, J. (2008). Migration and trade unions: a comparison between Dutch and Italian trade unions actions and strategies. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 14(4), 625–638.Google Scholar
  51. Marino, S., Penninx, R., & Roosblad, J. (2015). Trade unions, immigration and immigrants in Europe revisited: unions’ attitudes and actions. Comparative Migration Studies, 3(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Márquez, J. (2015). Más allá de la competencia agrícola hispano-marroquí. La gestión colectiva de los contratos en origen. Huelva: Universidad de Huelva.Google Scholar
  53. Martínez-Lucio, M., Marino, S., & Connolly, H. (2013). Broadening and reimagining regulation: trade unions, ‘active servicing’ and immigration in Spain since the early 1990s. Journal of Industrial Relations, 55(2), 190–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McLaughlin, J. (2009a). Trouble in our fields: health and human rights among Mexican and Caribbean migrant farm workers in Canada, doctoral thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  55. McLaughlin, J. (2009b). Migration and health: implications for development. The Canadian foundation for the americas labour mobility and development project, policy paper #2, October.Google Scholar
  56. McLaughlin, J., & Hennebry, J. (2013). Pathways to precarity: structural vulnerabilities and lived consequences for migrant farmworkers in Canada. In L. Goldring & P. Landolt (Eds.), Producing and negotiating non-citizenship: precarious legal status in Canada (pp. 175–194). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  57. Moreno, J. (2009). Los contratos en origen de temporada: Mujeres marroquíes en la agricultura onubense. Revista de Estudios Internacionales Mediterráneos, 7, 58–78.Google Scholar
  58. Nakache, D. (2013). The Canadian temporary foreign worker program: regulation, practices and protection gaps. In L. Goldring & P. Landolt (Eds.), Producing and negotiating non-citizenship: precarious legal status in Canada (pp. 71–95). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  59. Nakache, D., & Kinoshita, P. (2010). The Canadian temporary foreign worker program: do short-term economic needs prevail over human rights concerns?. IRPP Study, No. 5.Google Scholar
  60. National Post. (2014). Temporary foreign workers should be given citizenship, B.C. union says. June 22, 2014, http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/06/22/temporary-foreign-workers-should-be-given-citizenship-b-c-union-says/?__federated=1
  61. Newland, K., Rannveig, D., & Terrazas, A. (2008). Learning by doing. Experiences of circular migration. Washington: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  62. Nissen, B., & Grenier, G. (2001). Union response to mass immigration: the case of Miami, USA. Antipode, 33(3), 567–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Penninx, R., & Roosblad, J. (Eds.). (2001). Trade unions, immigration, and immigrants in Europe, 1960–1993. A comparative study of the actions of trade unions in seven West European countries. Oxford: Bergham Books.Google Scholar
  64. Phizacklea, A. and Miles, R. (1992). The British trade union movement and racism. In P. Braham, A. Rattanis & R. Skellington (Eds.), Racism and antiracism. Inequalities, opportunities and policies (pp. 30–45). London: Sage and Open University.Google Scholar
  65. Piper, N. (2010). Temporary economic migration and rights activism: an organizational perspective. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(1), 108–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Preibisch, K. (2007a). Local produce, foreign labour: labour mobility programs and global trade competitiveness in Canada. Rural Sociology, 72(3), 418–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Preibisch, K. (2007b). Forcing governments to govern in defense of noncitizen workers: a story about the Canadian labour movement’s alliance with agriculture migrants. In L. Goldring & S. Krishnamurti (Eds.), Organizing the transnational: labour, politics, and social change (pp. 115–128). Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  68. Preibisch, K. (2010). Pick-your-own labour: migrant workers and flexibility in Canadian agriculture. International Migration Review, 44(2), 404–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Preibisch, K. (2012). Migrant workers and changing workplace regimes in contemporary agricultural production in Canada. International Journal of the Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 19(1), 62–82.Google Scholar
  70. Preibisch, K. & Binford, L. (2007). Interrogating racialized global labour supply: an exploration of the racial/national replaceme of foreign agricultural workers in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 44 (1), 5–36.Google Scholar
  71. Raijman, R. & Kushnirovich, N. 2012. Labour migrant recruitment practices in Israel. Final Report. Ruppin Academic Center and Center for International Migration and Integration. CIMI.Google Scholar
  72. Raper, S., & Preibisch, K. (2007). Forcing governments to Govern in defense of noncitizen workers: a story about the Canadian labour movement’s alliance with agricultural migrants. In L. Goldring & S. Krishnamurti (Eds.), Organizing the transnational: labour, politics, and social change (pp. 115–128). Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  73. Rosewarne, S. (2010). Globalisation and commodification of labour: temporary labour migration. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 20(2), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Russo, R. M. (2012). Solidarity forever, Canadians never: SAWP workers in Canada. Doctoral Dissertation. University of British Columbia: Vancouver.Google Scholar
  75. Satzewich, V. (1991). Racism and the incorporation of foreign labour: farm labour migration to Canada since 1945. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  76. Sharma, N. (2006). Home economics: nationalism and the making of migrant workers in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  77. Simmons, A. (2010). Immigration in Canada: global and transnational perspectives. Toronto: Canadian Scholar’s Press.Google Scholar
  78. Simmons, A., & Keohane, K. (1992). Canadian immigration policy: state strategies and the quest for legitimacy. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 29(4), 421–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stürckow, I. (2015). La formulación de las políticas públicas de inmgración laboral en España 1985–2011. El papel de los agentes sociales en el policy-making. PhD dissertation. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar
  80. UFCW. (2005). The status of migrant farm workers in Canada, 2005. Ottawa: UFCW.Google Scholar
  81. UFCW. (2007). The status of migrant farm workers in Canada, 2006–2007. Ottawa: UFCW.Google Scholar
  82. UFCW. (2011). Report on the status of migrant workers in Canada, 2011. Ottawa: UFCW.Google Scholar
  83. Valarezo, G., & Hughes, C. (2012). Pushed to the edge: political activism of Guatemalan migrant farmworkers. Global Justice: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric, 1(5), 94–119.Google Scholar
  84. Watts, J. R. (1998a). Strange bedfellows: how Spanish labour union leaders and employers find common ground on immigration. The Policy Studies Journal, 26(4), 657–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Watts, J. R. (1998b). Italian and Spanish labour leaders’ unconventional immigration policy preferences. South European Society & Politics, 3(3), 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wickramasekara, P. (2011). Circular migration : a triple win or a dead end? International. Labour Office, Bureau for Workers’ Activities (ACTRAV). Geneva: International Migration Programme (MIGRANT), Discussion Paper 15.Google Scholar
  87. Wilkens, E. A. 2010. In defense of the new working class? Labour union embeddedness, labour migration and immigrant integration, PhD dissertation, Syracuse University.Google Scholar
  88. Zapata-Barrero, R., Faúndez García R., & Sánchez-Montijano E. (2012). Circular temporary labour migration: reassessing established public policies. International Journal of Population Research 1–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Anthropology, CriminologyUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada
  2. 2.Institute of Economics, Geography and Demography (IEGD)Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations