Making Sense of Naturalization: What Citizenship Means to Naturalizing Immigrants in Canada and the USA
- 961 Downloads
Immigrant naturalization is both a barometer of inclusiveness and immigrant incorporation and a mechanism of social reproduction of the nation. This article reports on an interview-based study in suburban Toronto and New Jersey that investigated how immigrants explain their decisions to acquire citizenship. It analyzes respondents’ understandings of naturalization in light of different theories of citizenship and different dimensions of the concept. The study contributes to the literature by showing how many American immigrants interviewed while going through the naturalization process resisted framing naturalization as identity-changing, situating it instead as a common-sense move following permanent settlement and belonging. In contrast, Canadian respondents were more likely to characterize naturalization as an active process that tied them to a positively valued nation. While immigrant respondents in both countries were interested in voting and travel benefits of citizenship, only American respondents sought the protection that citizenship would afford in an anti-immigrant policy climate. I discuss how naturalization as a tool of civic integration and political empowerment resonates with immigrants’ own understandings of the process and consider the role played by the institutional contexts around naturalization and immigration more generally.
KeywordsNaturalization Citizenship Immigration Identity Canada USA
- Aptekar, S. (2014). Citizenship status and patterns of inequality in the United States and Canada. Social Science Quarterly 95(2): 343--359.Google Scholar
- Aptekar, S. (2015). The road to citizenship: what naturalization means for immigrants and the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Basch, L., Glick Schiller, N., & Szanton Blanc, C. (1994). Nations unbound: transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation-states. Langhorne, PA: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
- Bean, F., & Stevens, G. (2003). America’s newcomers and the dynamics of diversity. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Bloemraad, I. (2006). Becoming a citizen: incorporating immigrants and refugees in the United States and Canada. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2002). Occupational outlook handbook, 2002–2003 edition. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor. Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Jones-Correa, M. (1998). Between two nations: the political predicament of Latinos in New York City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Kivisto, P., & Faist, T. (2007). Citizenship: discourse, theory, and transnational prospects. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- Migration Policy Institute. (2014). Immigrants in the US 1850–2012. MPI Data Hub. http://www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/data-hub/us-immigration-trends. Accessed 22 January 2015.
- Monsivais, G. (2001). Differences in self-identified national orientation among legal Hispanic immigrants to the United States. Dissertation Abstracts International A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 62, 4.Google Scholar
- North, D. S. (1985). The long grey welcome: a study of the American naturalization process. Washington, DC: National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials Education Fund.Google Scholar
- Ong, A. (1999). Flexible citizenship: the cultural logics of transnationality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Ong, P. M. (2011). Defensive naturalization and anti-immigrant sentiment: Chinese immigrants in three primate metropolises. Asian American Policy Review, 21, 39.Google Scholar
- Paquet, M. (2012). Beyond appearances: citizenship tests in Canada and the UK. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 13(2), 243–260.Google Scholar
- Plascencia, L. (2012). Disenchanting citizenship: Mexican migrants and the boundaries of belonging. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Public Service Employment Act (S.C. 2003, c. 22, ss. 12, 13). Section 39. Preferences, Priorities, and Entitlements. http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/P-33.01/page-10.html#h-16.
- Soysal, Y. (1994). Limits of citizenship: migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Statistics Canada. (2013). Immigration and ethnocultural diversity in Canada. National Household Survey, 2011. Analytical Document http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/as-sa/99-010-x/99-010-x2011001-eng.pdf. Accessed 22 January 2015.
- Sumption, M., & Flamm, S. (2012). The economic value of citizenship for immigrants in the United States. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
- US Census Bureau. (2012). The foreign-born population in the United States: 2010 American Community Survey reports. US Department of Commerce. Economics and Statistics Administration. http://www.census.gov/prod/2012pubs/acs-19.pdf. Accessed 22 January 2015.
- Wallace Goodman, S. (2010). Naturalisation policies in Europe: exploring patterns of inclusion and exclusion. Florence, Italy: European Union Observatory on Democracy. European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
- Weil, P. (2001). Access to citizenship: a comparison of twenty-five nationality laws. In T. A. Aleinikoff & D. Klusmeyer (Eds.), Citizenship today: global perspectives and practices (pp. 17–35). Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment.Google Scholar
- Wilson, S. J. (2003). Immigration and capital accumulation in Canada. In C. M. Beach, A. G. Green, & J. G. Reitz (Eds.), Canadian immigration policy for the 21 st century (pp. 125–196). Kingston, Ontario: John Deutsch Institute for the Study of Economic Policy.Google Scholar