Journal of International Migration and Integration

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 1031–1048 | Cite as

‘I Feel Like a Beggar’: Asylum Seekers Living in the Australian Community Without the Right to Work

Article

Abstract

While numbers of asylum seekers received by Australia are small compared to global figures, a range of deterrence measures have been implemented in response to increasing numbers arriving by boat in recent years. One of the more recent measures was denying asylum seekers who arrived by boat after 13 August 2012 the right to work upon their release from immigration detention into the community. There are around 26,000 asylum seekers who have been subject to this policy with most still waiting for their initial interview for refugee status and none have had their refugee claims resolved. This paper examines the findings of a study that explored the implications of this policy for asylum seekers. It draws on 29 semi-structured interviews with asylum seekers and highlights the distress and fear that many are enduring, caused by the denial of the right to work and ongoing uncertainty about their refugee claims. The study’s findings provide support for the conclusions of earlier research that highlight the importance of the right to work and securing employment for the mental health of asylum seekers, as well as studies that found there were negative mental health consequences of forcing asylum seekers to live for long periods with uncertainty around their protection claims.

Keywords

Asylum seekers Right to work Living in the community Australia 

References

  1. Australian Human Rights Commission (2013). Tell me about: the “enhanced screening process”. http://www.humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/document/publication/enhanced-screening.pdf. Accessed 29 September 2014.
  2. Australian Red Cross (2013a). Community Assistance Support Program. http://www.redcross.org.au/community-assistance-support.aspx. Accessed 1 February 2014.
  3. Australian Red Cross (2013b). Asylum Seeker Assistance Scheme. http://www.redcross.org.au/asylum-seeker-assistance-scheme.aspx. Accessed 1 February 2014.
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Croucher, G. (2007). A chance to contribute: some remarks on the potential economic impact of allowing asylum seekers the right to work. Just Policy, 44, 37–43.Google Scholar
  6. Cullen, S (2012). First asylum seekers arrive on Manus Island. ABC News, 21 November. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-11-21/first-asylum-seekers-arrive-on-manus-island/4383876. Accessed 30 August 2014.
  7. Da Lomba, S. (2010). Legal status and refugee integration: a UK perspective. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23(4), 415–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DIBP (2013a). Summary of what asylum seekers arriving by boat without a visa may access under community support programs.Google Scholar
  9. DIBP. (2013b). Community programmes service providers’ newsletter #8 November.Google Scholar
  10. DIBP (2013c). Asylum Trends: 2012–2013. November. http://ww.immi.gov.au/media/publications/statistics/immigration-update/asylum-trends-aus-2012-13.pdf. Accessed 24 August 2014.
  11. DIBP (2014). Removal of the immigration advice and application assistance scheme and introduction of protection application information and guides. March. http://www.immi.gov.au/Live/Documents/paig-g.pdf. Accessed 24 August 2014.
  12. DIBP (2015). Immigration Detention and Community Statistics Summary 31 January 2015. http://www.immi.gov.au/About/Documents/detention/immigration-detention-statistics-jan2015.pdf. Accessed 12 February 2015.
  13. Doyle, L (2009). “I hate being idle”. Wasted skills and enforced dependence among Zimbabwean asylum seekers in the UK. http://www.refugeecouncil.org.uk/assets/0001/7049/I_hate_being_idle.pdf. Accessed 24 August 2014.
  14. Edwards, A. (2005). Human rights, refugees, and the right “to enjoy” asylum. International Journal of Refugee Law, 17, 293–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fleay, C., Hartley, L., & Kenny, M. A. (2013). Refugees and asylum seekers living in the Australian community: the importance of work rights and employment support. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 473–93.Google Scholar
  16. Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. (2014). International Refugee Law and Refugee Policy: The Case of Deterrence Policies. Journal of Refugee Studies, doi:10.1093/jrs/feu030.Google Scholar
  17. Grugh, R (2014). “Can you please help me? How can we live?” UnitingCare’s emergency relief and crisis support for asylum seekers living in the community. March. http://apo.org.au/research/can-you-please-help-me-how-can-we-live-unitingcares-emergency-relief-and-crisis-support. Accessed 2 September 2014.
  18. Home Office (2014). Asylum policy instruction: Permission to work. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/299415/Permission_to_Work_Asy_v6_0.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2015.
  19. House of Oireachtas (2013). Written answers Nos. 472–490: Asylum applications. http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/debateswebpack.nsf/takes/dail2013062500091?opendocument#WRX01250. Accessed 17 May 2015
  20. Hugo, G (2011). A Significant Contribution: Economic, Social and Civic Contributions of First and Second Generation Humanitarian Entrants. http://www.immi.gov.au/media/publications/research/_pdf/economic-social-civic-contributions-booklet2011.pdf. Accessed 12 August 2014.
  21. Human Rights Watch (2013). At least let them work: The denial of work authorization and assistance for asylum seekers in the United States. http://www.hrw.org/reports/2013/11/12/least-let-them-work. Accessed 15 May 2015
  22. Jacobsen, K. (2006). Refugees and asylum seekers in urban areas: a livelihoods perspective. Journal of Refugee Studies, 19(3), 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnston, V. (2009). Australian asylum policies: have they violated the right to health of asylum seekers? Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 40–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law. (2013). Fact sheet: Enhanced screening process and fast track policies. University of New South Wales. http://www.kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au/sites/kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au/files/enhanced_screening_final_13.11.13.pdf. Accessed 2 August 2014.
  25. Lundberg, P. (2013). Refugees’ employment integration in Sweden: cultural distance and labor market performance. Review of International Economics, 21, 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marston, G. (2004). A punitive policy: labour force participation of refugees on temporary protection visas. Labour and Industry, 15(1), 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McNevin, A., & Correa-Velez, I. (2006). Asylum seekers living in the community on Bridging Visa E: community sector’s response to detrimental policies. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 41(1), 125–139.Google Scholar
  28. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research. (2013). Poverty Lines: Australia June Quarter 2013. http://melbourneinstitute.com/downloads/publications/Poverty%20Lines/Poverty-lines-Australia-June2013.pdf. Accessed 24 August 2014.
  29. Milosevic, D., Cheng, I., & Smith, M. (2012). The NSW Refugee Health Service: improving refugee access to primary care. Australian Family Physician, 41(3), 147–9.Google Scholar
  30. Morrison, S. (2013a). Minister for Immigration and Border Protection. Operation Sovereign Borders update’. 1 November. http://www.minister.immi.gov.au/media/sm/2013/sm209273.htm. Accessed 24 August 2014.
  31. Morrison, S. (2013b). Minister for Immigration and Border Protection. Government implements behaviour code for illegal maritime arrivals in the community. 20 December. http://www.minister.immi.gov.au/search/cache.cgi?collection=immirss&doc=2013%2Fsm210412.xml. Accessed 24 August 2014.
  32. Phillimore, J., & Goodson, L. (2006). Problem or opportunity? Asylum seekers, refugees, employment and social exclusion in deprived urban areas. Urban Studies, 43, 1715–1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Phillips, J, & Spinks, H (2013). Boat Arrivals in Australia since 1976. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1314/BoatArrivals. Accessed 24 August 2014.
  34. Refugee Council of Australia (2015). Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Act 2014: What it means for asylum seekers. http://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1502-Legacy-Caseload.pdf. Accessed 12 February 2015.
  35. Silove, D. & Steel, Z. (1998). The mental health and well-being of on-shore asylum seekers in Australia’ Sydney: Psychiatry Research and Teaching Unit, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
  36. Spike, E. A., Smith, M. M., & Harris, M. F. (2011). Access to primary health care services by community-based asylum seekers. Medical Journal of Australia, 195(4), 188–191.Google Scholar
  37. Steel, Z., Momartin, S., Silove, D., Coello, M., Aroche, J., & Tay, K. W. (2011). Two year psychosocial and mental health outcomes for refugees subjected to restrictive or supportive immigration policies. Social Science and Medicine, 72(7), 1149–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Steel, Z., Silove, D., Brooks, R., Momartin, S., Alzuhairi, B., & Susljik, I. (2006). Impact of immigration detention and temporary protection on the mental health of refugees. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stupp, C (2014). Germany struggles to house rising number of asylum seekers. IRIN, http://www.irinnews.org/report/100754/germany-struggles-to-house-rising-number-of-asylum-seekers. Accessed 17 May 2015.
  40. Sulaiman-Hill, C. M. R., & Thompson, S. C. (2012). Afghan and Kurdish refugees, 8–20 years after resettlement, still experience psychological distress and challenges to well being. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 36(2), 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Taylor, S. (2000). Do on-shore asylum seekers have economic and social rights? Dealing with the moral contradiction of liberal democracy. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 1(1), 70–97.Google Scholar
  42. UNHCR (2000). Reception Standards for Asylum Seekers in the European Union. http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/pdfid/3ae6b3440.pdf. Accessed 2 September 2013.
  43. UNHCR (2013a). War’s Cost: UNHCR Global Trends 2013. http://www.unhcr.org/5399a14f9.html. Accessed 2 August 2014.
  44. UNHCR (2013b). Asylum-seekers on Bridging Visas in Australia: Protection Gaps. 16 December. http://unhcr.org.au/unhcr/images/2013-12-16%20Asylum-seekers%20on%20bridging%20visas%20in%20Australia%20-%20.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2015.
  45. Valenta, M., & Thorshaug, K. (2012). Asylum-seekers’ perspectives on work and proof of identity: the Norwegian experience. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 31, 76–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Waxman, P. (2001). The economic adjustment of recently arrived Bosnian, Afghan and Iraqi refugees in Sydney, Australia. International Migration Review, 35(2), 472–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wren, K. (2007). Supporting asylum seekers and refugees in Glasgow: the role of multi-agency networks. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20(3), 391–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yaxley, L, Norman, J, & Gul, J (2015). Temporary protection visas: Senate votes to bring back temporary visas after deal to get children off Christmas Island. ABC News. 5 December. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-05/senate-agrees-to-reintroduce-temporary-protection-visas/5945576. Accessed 12 February 2015.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Human Rights EducationCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations