Migration Stressors, Psychological Distress, and Family—a Sri Lankan Tamil Refugee Analysis

Article

Abstract

Each refugee community experiences specific migration experiences. The migration journey of Sri Lankan Tamil refugees are marked by exposure to multiple pre- and post-migration traumatic events. A two-group, cross-sectional design was used to identify the relationship among migration stressors, family presence, and number of children based on refugee theory. The results of the study indicate that refugees in India have higher psychological distress than refugees in Canada, and the number of children had a positive relationship with psychological distress. Findings from the study will help in the adaptation of culturally and contextually relevant settlement programs to improve the quality of life for refugees and to reduce the cost of settlement programs provided by host countries.

Keywords

Refugee trauma Refugee theory Refugee settlement programs Sri Lankan Tamils Refugee policies 

References

  1. Amarasingam, A (2013). History of Tamil Diaspora Politics in Canada: Organizational Dynamics and Negotiated Order, 1978–2013. (Research Paper 11). International Centre for Ethnic Studies. Colombo, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
  2. Balgopal, P. R. (2000). Social work practice with immigrants and refugees. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bhui, K., Abdi, A., Abdi, M., Pereira, S., Dualeh, M., Robertson, D., et al. (2003). Traumatic events, migration characteristics and psychiatric symptoms among Somali refugees. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 38(1), 35–43.Google Scholar
  4. Castro, F., Barrera, M., & Martinez, C. (2004). The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prevention Science, 5, 41–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fazel, M., Wheeler, J., & Danesh, J. (2005). Prevalence of serious mental disorder in 7000 refugees resettled in Western countries: a systematic review. Lancet, 365(9467), 1309–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fernando, G. A., Miller, K. E., & Berger, D. E. (2010). Growing pains: the impact of disaster-related and daily stressors on the psychological and psychosocial functioning of youth in Sri Lanka. Child Development, 81(4), 1192–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flaherty, J. A., Gaviria, F. M., & Pathak, D. (1988). Developing instruments for cross-cultural psychiatric research. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 176, 257–263.Google Scholar
  8. George, M. (2009). Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora: Contextualizing pre-migration and post-migration traumatic events and psychological distress. Dissertation. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  9. George, M. (2010a). Sri Lankan Tamil refugee experiences: A qualitative analysis. International Journal of Culture and Mental Health, 6(3), 170–182.Google Scholar
  10. George, M. (2010b). A theoretical understanding of refugee trauma. Clinical Social Work Journal, 38(4), 379–387.Google Scholar
  11. George, M. (2012). Migration traumatic experiences and refugee distress: Implications for social work practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 40, 429–437.Google Scholar
  12. George, U., & Tsang, A. (2000). Newcomers to Canada from former Yugoslavia. International Social Work, 43(3), 381–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giammatteo, J. (2010). To return or stay? Forced Migration Review, (35), 52.Google Scholar
  14. Grønseth, A. S. (2006). Experiences of tensions in re-orienting selves: Tamil refugees in northern Norway seeking medical advice. Anthropology & Medicine, 13(1), 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hollifield, M., Warner, T., Lian, N., Krakow, B., Jenkins, J., Kesler, J., Stevenson, J., & Westermeyer, J. (2002). Measuring trauma and health status in refugees: a critical review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(5), 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huisman, M. (2000). Imputation of missing item responses: Some simple techniques. Quality and Quantity, 34, 331–351.Google Scholar
  17. Kadengye, D. T., Cools, W., Ceulemans, E., & Van de Noortgate, W. (2012). Simple imputation methods versus direct likelihood analysis for missing item scores in multilevel educational data. Behavioral Research, 44, 516–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kunz, E. (1973). The refugee in flight: kinetic models and forms of displacement. The International Migration Review, 7(2), 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kunz, E. (1981). Exile and resettlement: refugee theory. International Migration Review, 15(1/2), 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lau, A. S. (2006). Making the case for selective and directed cultural adaptations of evidence-based treatments: examples from parent training. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 13(4), 295–310.Google Scholar
  21. Lhewa, D., Banu, S., Rosenfeld, B., & Keller, A. (2007). Validation of a Tibetan translation of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist–25 and the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire. Assessment, 14(3), 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCabe, K. M., Yeh, M., Garland, A. F., Lau, A. S., & Chavez, G. (2005). The GANA program: a tailoring approach to adapting parent child interaction therapy for Mexican Americans. Education and Treatment of Children, 28(2), 111–129.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, K. E., Fernando, G. A., & Berger, D. E. (2009). Daily stressors in the lives of Sri Lankan youth: a mixed, methods approach to assessment in a context of war and natural disaster. Intervention, 7(3), 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mollica, R., Caspi-Yavan, Y., Bollini, P., Truong, T., Tor, S., & Lavelle, J. (1992). The Harvard trauma questionnaire: validating a cross-cultural instrument for measuring torture, trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in Indochinese refugees. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 180, 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Organization for Eelam Refugees Rehabilitation (2012). OFERR information. Retrieved Sept 15, 2012, from http://www.oferr.org/home.php.
  26. Paludan, A. (1974). The new refugees in Europe. Geneva, Switzerland: University Exchange Fund.Google Scholar
  27. Paludan, A. (1981). Refugees in Europe. International Migration Review, 15(1/2), 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Portes, A. (2001). Legacies the story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rousseau, C., Crépeau, F., Foxen, P., & Houle, F. (2002). The complexity of determining refugeehood: a multidisciplinary analysis of the decision-making process of the Canadian immigration and refugee board. Journal of Refugee Studies, 15(1), 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Somasundaram, D. (2007). Collective trauma in northern Sri Lanka: a qualitative psychosocial-ecological study. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 1(1), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Steel, Z., Silove, D., Brooks, R., Momartin, S., Alzuhairi, B., & Susljik, I. (2006). Impact of immigration detention and temporary protection on the mental health of refugees. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stein, B. (1986). The experience of being a refugee: insights from the research literature. In C. Williams & J. Westermeyer (Eds.), Refugee mental health in resettlement countries: The series in clinical and community psychology (pp. 5–23). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publications Corp.Google Scholar
  34. Tambiah, S. (1992). Buddhism betrayed?: religion, politics, and violence in Sri Lanka. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2011). Refugees by numbers 2011 edition. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from http://www.unhcr.org/pages/49c3646c4d6.html.
  36. Wayland, S. (2004). Ethnonationalist networks and transnational opportunities: the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora. Review of International Studies, 30, 405–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weaver, H. (2005). Reexamining what we think we know: a lesson learned from Tamil refugees. Affilia Journal of Women & Social Work, 20(2), 238–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weine, S., Feetham, S., Kulauzovic, Y., Knafl, K., Besic, S., Klebic, A., Mujagic, A., Muzurovic, J., Spahovic, D., & Pavkovic, I. (2006). A family beliefs framework for socially and culturally specific preventive interventions with refugee youths and families. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wenzel, T. (2002). Forensic evaluation of sequels to torture. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 15(6), 611–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social WorkVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations