Book Review: Us, Them, and Others and the Missing Cornerstone of Colonization

  • Jeffrey S. DenisEmail author
Book Review

Elke Winter’s Us, Them, and Others: Pluralism and National Identity in Diverse Societies is a theoretically sophisticated, empirically intriguing account of how ‘we’ become normatively pluralist or how some nations come to identify as ‘multicultural’. Winter’s central contribution is her conceptual model of pluralism as “a dynamic set of triangular relations…between unequal groups and (real or imagined) others” (p. 8). In this view, pluralism is neither a voluntary ‘concession’ by the national majority nor a purely cynical attempt at ‘containment’, but rather ‘a negotiated compromise’ in the context of ongoing power imbalance. Furthermore, the compromise between ‘us’ (national majority) and ‘others’ (minorities) becomes meaningful only through confrontation with “(real or constructed) outsiders (‘them’)”. Put simply, us + others = multicultural we ≠ them.

After firmly grounding her model in a Weberian sociology of ethnic group relations, Winter then applies it to the Canadian case...


  1. Alfred, T., & Corntassel, J. (2005). Being indigenous: resurgences against contemporary colonialism. Government and Opposition, 40(4), 597–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bail, C. (2008). The configuration of symbolic boundaries against immigrants in Europe. American Sociological Review, 73(1), 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumer, H. (1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. The Pacific Sociological Review, 1(1), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bobo, L., & Hutchings, V. L. (1996). Perceptions of racial group competition: extending Blumer’s theory of group position to a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review, 61(6), 951–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fleras, A. (2011). Reclaiming aboriginality: from mainstream media representations to aboriginal self-representation. In D. Long & O. P. Dickason (Eds.), Visions of the heart: Canadian aboriginal issues (pp. 189–212). Don Mills: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lawrence, B. (2002). Rewriting histories of the land: colonization and Indigenous resistance in Eastern Canada. In S. Razack (Ed.), Race, space and the law: unmapping a white settler society (pp. 21–46). Toronto: Between the Lines Press.Google Scholar
  8. Mackey, E. (2010). Settling differences: managing and representing people and land in the Canadian national project. In M. Wallis et al. (Eds.), Colonialism and racism in Canada: historical traces and contemporary issues (pp. 17–37). Toronto: Nelson Canada.Google Scholar
  9. Saul, J. R. (2008). A fair country: telling truths about Canada. Toronto: Viking Canada.Google Scholar
  10. Steinman, E. (2012). Settler colonial power and the American Indian sovereignty movement: forms of domination, strategies of transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 117(4), 1073–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations