Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Representation of Immigrants in Federal, State, and Local Government Work Forces

  • Published:
Journal of International Migration and Integration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Public sector employment of immigrants can increase their economic assimilation and potentially improve their treatment by government. Yet, as we show using Census data from 1990, 2000, and 2009–2011, immigrants are substantially underrepresented in federal, state, and local governments. To understand why, we use logit analysis for federal and for state and local government employment in each time period to test whether immigrants’ weaker educational attainment and English proficiency, lower probabilities of being citizens and military veterans, and different age, gender, and race/ethnicity distributions can explain that underrepresentation. Disparities in education and preferential government treatment of veterans are factors, but citizenship requirements appear to be the major obstacle to immigrant employment in the public sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Because we are not trying to describe the impact of age or education on the probability of public sector employment, we do not make the simplifying assumptions that the effect of education is linear and that the effect of age is parabolic. If those are, in fact, the patterns, the dummy variables will capture them, and in samples of 3 million, degree of freedom does not pose an issue.

  2. North Dakota and West Virginia are small states with low immigrant percentages, and sampling error is a possible explanation.

  3. Graphs for the other 2 years show very similar patterns. In regressions using states as the units of analysis, the slope varies only between .44 and .46 across the 3 years. The relationship is quite strong: the R 2 values range from .89 to .92.

References

  • Asher, M., & Popkin, J. (1984). The effect of gender and race differentials on public-private wage comparisons: a study of postal workers. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 38(1), 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. (1997). Race, self-employment and upward mobility: an illusive American dream. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R. M. (1985). An analysis of workers' choice between employment in the public and private sectors. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 38(2), 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. J. (1980). Wage determination in the federal government: the role of constituents and bureaucracy. Journal of Political Economy, 88(6), 1110–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. J., & Friedberg, R. M. (2009). Recent trends in the earnings of new immigrants to the United States. Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. L. (1993). Differences in the earnings of black workers in the private and public sectors. The Social Science Journal, 30(2), 133–142. doi:10.1016/0362-3319(93)90029-u.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., Zalamanovitch, Y., & Davidesko, H. (2006). "The role of public sector image and personal characteristics in determining tendency to work in the public sector." Public Administration Quarterly no. Winter: 447–482.

  • Collins, S. M. (1983). The making of the black middle class. Social Problems, 30(4), 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crum, J., & Naff, K. C. (1997). Looking like America: the continuing importance of affirmative action in federal employment. Public Productivity & Management Review, 20(3), 272–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisinger, P. K. (1982). Black employment in municipal jobs: the impact of black political power. The American Political Science Review, 76(2), 380–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, M., & Wright, R. (1999). The industrial division of labor among immigrants and internal migrants to the Los Angeles economy. International Migration Review, 33(1), 26–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, R. W., & Robb, A. (2007). Why are black-owned businesses less successful than white-owned businesses: the role of families, inheritances, and business human capital. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(2), 289–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamage, Daya. (2011). Asian Immigrants to U.S. Better Educated, National Census Reports 2005 [cited May 18 2011]. Available from http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2005/02/26/asian-immigrants-us-better-educated-national-census-reports.

  • Gordon, M. M. (1964). Assimilation in American life: the role of race, religion and national origins. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodsky, E., & Pager, D. (2001). The structure of disadvantage: individual and occupational determinants of the black-white wage gap. American Sociological Review, 66(4), 542–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. J., & Hupe, P. L. (2002). Implementing public policy: governance in theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindera, J. J. (1993). Representative bureaucracy: further evidence of active representation in the EEOC district offices. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(4), 415–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H., Reyes, B., Marneesh, L., & Barbour, E. (1999) Taking the oath: an analysis of naturalization in California and the U.S. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.

  • Katz, M. B., Stern, M. J., & Fader, J. J. (2007). The Mexican immigration debate: the view from history. Social Science History, 31(2), 157–189. doi:10.1215/01455532-2006-019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keiser, L. R., Wilkins, V. M., Meier, K. J., & Holland, C. A. (2002). Lipstick and logarithms: gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 96(3), 553–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley, J. D. (1944). Representative bureaucracy: an interpretation of the British civil service. Yellow Springs: The Antioch Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal, D. L. (1999). It's not just a job: military service and Latino political participation. Political Behavior, 21(2), 153–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leete, L. (2001). Whither the nonprofit wage differential? Estimates from the 1990 census. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(1), 136–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. B., & Frank, S. A. (2002). Who wants to work for the government? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 395–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Gregory B. (2010). Turnover, hiring, and the changing face of the federal service. In American Political Science Association. Washington, DC.

  • Lewis, Gregory B. (2011). The impact of veterans’ preference on the federal civil service. In American Political Science Association. Seattle.

  • Lewis, G. B., & Pitts, D. W. (2011). Representation of lesbians and gay men in federal, state, and local bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. G., & Ramakrishnan, S. K. (2007). Police practices in immigrant-destination cities political control or bureaucratic professionalism? Urban Affairs Review, 42(6), 874–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, N. (2001). On the back of blacks? Immigrants and the fortunes of African Americans. In R. Waldinger (Ed.), Strangers at the gates: New immigrants in urban America (pp. 186–227). Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Liu, C. Y. (2011). Employment concentration and job quality for low-skilled Latino immigrants. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(2): 117–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llorens, J. J., Wenger, J. B., & Kellough, J. E. (2008). Choosing public sector employment: the impact of wages on the representation of women and minorities in state bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(3), 397–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., Alba, R. D., & Stults, B. J. (2003). Enclaves and entrepreneurs: assessing the payoff for immigrants and minorities. International Migration Review, 37(2), 344–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. E. (1949). Power and administration. Public Administration Review, 9(4), 257–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrow, H. B. (2005). New destinations and immigrant incorporation. Perspectives on Politics, 3(4), 781–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrow, H. B. (2009). Immigrant bureaucratic incorporation: the dual roles of professional missions and government policies. American Sociological Review, 74(5), 756–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschall, M., Rigby, E., Jenkins, J. (2011). "Do state policies constrain local actors? The impact of English only laws on language instruction in public schools." Publius: The Journal of Federalism.

  • Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. C. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: stories from the front lines of public service. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K. J. (1993). Latinos and representative bureaucracy testing the Thompson and Henderson hypotheses. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(4), 393–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K. J., & Nigro, L. G. (1976). Representative bureaucracy and policy preferences: a study in the attitudes of federal executives. Public Administration Review, 36(4), 458–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K. J., & Stewart, J., Jr. (1992). The impact of representative bureaucracies: educational systems and public policies. The American Review of Public Administration, 22(3), 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollenkopf, J., & Hochschild, J. (2010). Immigrant political incorporation: comparing success in the United States and Western Europe. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(1), 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, F. C. (1968). Democracy and the public service. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Hispanic Center. (2011). Statistical portrait of Hispanics in the United States, 2009: Pew Hispanic Center.

  • Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1996). Self-employment and the earnings of immigrants. American Sociological Review, 61(2), 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riccucci, N. M. (2005). How management matters: street-level bureaucrats and welfare reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, D. H., & Berry, C. R. (1984). The Civil Service Reform Act and EEO: the record to date. In P. W. Ingraham & C. Ban (Eds.), Legislating bureaucratic change: the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (pp. 182–199). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J. (2007). Nativity, human capital, and government employment. Social Science Research, 36(1), 404–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. (1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden, S. C. (1997a). The promise of representative bureaucracy: diversity and responsiveness in a government agency. New York: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden, S. C. (1997b). Representative bureaucracy. The American Review of Public Administration, 27(1), 22–42. doi:10.1177/027507409702700103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singell, L. D., Jr. (1991). Racial differences in the employment policy of state and local governments: the case of male workers. Southern Economic Journal, 58(2), 430–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J. E., & Selden, S. C. (2003). Administrative discretion and active representation: an expansion of the theory of representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 700–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, L. (1986). Representative local government: minorities in the municipal work force. The Journal of Politics, 48(3), 694–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). A compass for understanding and using American community survey data: what PUMS data users need to know. edited by U.S. Department of Commerce. Washington, DC.

  • U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (2010). Federal employment information fact sheets: employment of non-citizens. Washington, DC.

  • Waldinger, R. (2001). Up from poverty? “Race,” immigration, and the fate of low‐skilled workers. In R. Waldinger (Ed.), Strangers at the gates: New immigrants in urban America (pp. 80–116). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

  • Waldinger, R. (1994). The making of an immigrant niche. International Migration Review, 28(1), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldinger, R. (1996). Still the promised city? New immigrants and African Americans in postindustrial New York. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R., & Ellis, M. (2000). The ethnic and gender division of labor compared among immigrants to Los Angeles. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(3), 567–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, P. Q. (1999). Quality of post-1965 Asian immigrants. Population and Environment, 20(6), 527–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Z., & Xie, Y. (2004). Asian-Americans' earnings disadvantage reexamined: the role of place of education. The American Journal of Sociology, 109(5), 1075–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cathy Yang Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, G.B., Liu, C.Y. & Edwards, J.T. The Representation of Immigrants in Federal, State, and Local Government Work Forces. Int. Migration & Integration 15, 469–486 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-013-0282-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-013-0282-8

Keywords

Navigation