Advertisement

Open Minds on Open Borders

  • Nathan BasikEmail author
Article

Abstract

This article is a plea, both moral and empirical, for open borders to be put on the agenda of mainstream academic theory. It begins by conceptualizing the liberalization of international labor markets as compensation for those who have not benefitted from the liberalization of capital and commodity markets. To demonstrate that the opportunity costs of maintaining closed borders are unacceptably high, it reports on economic studies suggesting huge gains from relaxing national border controls. The focus then turns to the historical record to argue against the realist notion that closed international borders are inevitable. Flaws are exposed in the logic underlying realist “infeasibility” arguments, as well as in much of the misinformation driving mass opinion against increased immigration into the USA. To explain how such myths are perpetuated by some prominent academic theorists, the focus turns to the “liberal paradox” reinforcing the moral perfectionism by which domestic inequality is condemned, but far greater international inequality is not. The conclusion, inspired by Julien Benda's The Betrayal of the Intellectuals, is that this perfectionism can be avoided by emphasizing intellectual integrity and the courage to follow one's ideas to their full logical consequences.

Keywords

Immigration Open borders Labor market liberalization Liberal paradox 

References

  1. Benda, J. (1955). The betrayal of the intellectuals (trans: Aldington, R.). Boston: Beacon Press. Original work published in 1927.Google Scholar
  2. Bernstein, W. (2008). A splendid age: how trade shaped the world. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bhagwati, J. (2004). In defense of globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blake, M. (2001). Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 30, 257–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brinkley, T. (1961). International migration and economic development. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  6. Casey, J. P. (2009). Open borders: absurd chimera or inevitable future policy? International Migration, 48, 14–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clemens, M. (2011). Economics and emigration: trillion-dollar bills on the sidewalk? (working paper 264). Washington: Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (2001). World population in 2050: assessing the projections. In J.S. Little & R. Triest (Eds.), Seismic shifts: the economic impact of demographic change. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Conference Series No. 46. pp. 83–113Google Scholar
  9. Dowty, A. (1987). Closed borders: the contemporary assault on freedom of movement. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Easterly, W. (2006). The white man's burden. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  11. Eco, U. (2001). Five moral pieces. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  12. Iregui, A. M. (2005). Efficiency gains from the elimination of global restrictions on labour mobility: an analysis using a multiregional CGE model. In G. Borjas & J. Crisp (Eds.), Poverty, international migration, and asylum (pp. 211–238). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Jennings, J., & Kemp-Welch, A. (1997). The century of the intellectual: from the Dreyfuss Affair to Salman Rushdie. In J. Jennings & A. Kemp-Welch (Eds.), Intellectuals in politics (pp. 1–21). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Kenny, C. (2011). Getting better. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Kymlicka, W. (2001). Territorial boundaries: a liberal egalitarian perspective. In D. Miller & S. H. Hashmi (Eds.), Boundaries and justice (pp. 249–275). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Legrain, P. (2007). Immigrants: your country needs them. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Locke, J. (1993). Two treatises of government (M. Goldie, Ed.). London: Everyman. (Original written c.1680–1683).Google Scholar
  18. Lomasky, L. (2001). Toward a liberal theory of national boundaries. In D. Miller & S. H. Hashmi (Eds.), Boundaries and justice (pp. 55–78). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Moses, J. W. (2006). International migration: globalization's last frontier. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  20. Moses, J. W., & Letnes, B. (2005). If people were money: estimating the gains and scope of free migration. In G. Borjas & J. Crisp (Eds.), Poverty, international migration, and asylum (pp. 188–210). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Pearce, F. (2010). The coming population crash: and our planet's surprising future. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Pritchett, L. (2006). Let their people come: breaking the gridlock on global labor mobility. Washington: Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
  23. Rawls, J. (1999). The law of peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rodrik, D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far? Washington: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  25. Rodrik, D. (2002). Feasible globalizations (working paper no. 9129). Cambridge: NBER.Google Scholar
  26. Rogowski, R. (1989). Commerce and coalitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Samuelson, P. (1966). The collected scientific papers of Paul A. Samuelson (v. 2). (J. Stiglitz, Ed.). Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  28. Samuelson, P. (2004). Where Ricardo and Mill rebut and confirm arguments of mainstream economists supporting globalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shachar, A. (2009). The birthright lottery. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Viorst, M. (1994). The great documents of Western civilization. New York: Barnes and Noble Books.Google Scholar
  31. Walzer, M. (1988). The company of critics. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  32. Winters, A., Walmsley, T., Wang, Z. K., & Grynberg, R. (2002). Negotiating the liberalization of the temporary movement of natural persons. Brighton: University of Sussex. Discussion paper 87.Google Scholar
  33. Woodward, J. (1992). Commentary: liberalism and migration. In B. Barry & R. Goodin (Eds.), Free movement (pp. 59–84). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  34. World Bank. (2005). Global economic prospects: economic implications of remittances and migration. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA

Personalised recommendations