Advertisement

Immigration Debate in Canada: How Newspapers Reported, 1996–2004

  • Harald BauderEmail author
Article

Abstract

Media representations shape public opinion of immigration, affect policy debate, and influence immigration law. This paper examines media coverage of immigration in the context of the development and conception of the Canadian 2002 Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. The paper performs a topoi analysis on a data set of 490 articles published in five prominent Canadian English-language daily newspapers that address aspects of immigration law. The results reveal that danger is the most frequent and a relatively consistent theme associated with immigration in media coverage. Cultural aspects are relatively unimportant compared to humanitarian, political, and economic considerations.

Keywords

Media discourse Immigration debate Immigration law Danger Canada Topoi 

Résumé

Les observations des médias forment l’opinion publique sur l’immigration, affectent les débats d’orientation et influencent le droit de l’immigration. Cet article étudie la couverture médiatique de l’immigration dans le contexte du développement et de la conception de la Loi canadienne sur l’immigration et la protection des réfugiés de 2002. Une analyse topoi a été effectuée sur un ensemble de données consistant en 490 articles portant sur des aspects du droit de l’immigration et publiés dans cinq quotidiens canadiens anglais. Les résultats indiquent que le thème qui revient le plus souvent et de façon relativement constante dans la couverture médiatique sur l’immigration est celui du danger. Les aspects culturels de la question semblent peu importants par rapport aux considérations humanitaires, politiques et économiques.

Mots clés

Discours médiatique Débat sur l’immigration Droit de l’immigration Danger Canada Topoi 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research was made possible by a grant from the Canadian Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. I thank James Christison, Sophia Lowe, Genevieve Gilbert, and Jennifer Herne for research assistance.

References

  1. Abu-Laban, Y. (1998). Welcome/STAY OUT: The contradictions of Canadian integration and immigration policies at the millennium. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 30(3), 191–211.Google Scholar
  2. Arar Commission. (2006). Maher Arar commission of inquiry. Retrieved September 2006 from: www.ararcommission.ca
  3. Arar, M. (2006). Maher Arar: Chronology of events. Retrieved September 2006 from: www.maherarar.ca/
  4. Bauder, H. (2005). Landscape and scale in media representations: The construction of offshore farm labour in Ontario, Canada. Cultural Geographies, 12(1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauder, H. (2006). Labor movement: How migration regulates labor markets. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bauder, H. (2008). Media discourse and the new German immigration law. Journal for Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(1), 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: Viking.Google Scholar
  8. Bissoondath, N. (1994). Selling illusions: The cult of multiculturalism in Canada. Toronto: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  9. Böke, K., Jung, M., Niehr, T., & Wengeler, M. (2000). Vergleichende Diskurslinguistik: Überlegungen zur Analyse national heterogener Textkorpora. In T. Niehr, & K. Böke (Eds.), Einwanderungsdiskurse: Vergleichende diskurslinguistische Studien (pp. 11–36). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. Callcott, M. (2002). Canada’s immigration policy: The need for major reform. Public Policy Sources 64. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Canadian Press, (2004). More immigrants needed for workforce: Minister. The Toronto Star, Oct. 29. Retrieved October 29, 2004, from: http://www.thestar.ca.
  12. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (1999). Building on a strong foundation for the 21st century: New directions for immigration and refugee policy and legislation. Ottawa: Ministry of Public Works and Government Services Canada.Google Scholar
  13. Citizenship and Immigration Canada, (2002). News Release 2002-01: Fair and Equitable Response From Minister. Retrieved September 2006 from: www.cic.gc.ca/english/press/02/0201-pre.html
  14. Coell, M. (2004). The welcome mat is out for skilled immigrants. The Vancouver Province, Jun. 10. Retrieved June 10, 2004, from: http://www.canada.com/vancouver/theprovince.
  15. Crespi, I. (1997). The public opinion process: How the people speak. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Dauvergne, C. (2005). Humanitarianism, identity, and nation: Migration laws in Canada and Australia. Vancouver: UBC.Google Scholar
  17. DeVoretz, D. J. (Ed.). (1995). Diminishing returns: The economics of Canada's recent immigration policy. Toronto & Vancouver: C.D. Howe & The Laurier Institution.Google Scholar
  18. Driedger, L. & Halli, S. S. (Eds.) (2000). Race and racism: Canada’s challenge. Montreal & Kingston: McGill/Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Economic Council of Canada (1991). Economic and social impacts of immigration. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.Google Scholar
  20. Elliott, A., & Alix, R. (2000). Caplan should halt plan for immigrant HIV tests. The Toronto Star, December 15. p. 1.Google Scholar
  21. Esses, V. M., Dovidio, M. J., & Armstrong, T. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fairlcough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  23. Freeman, G. P. (1995). Modes of immigration politics in liberal demographic states. International Migration Review, 29(4), 881–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall, S. (1977). Culture, the media and the ideological effect. In J. Curran (Ed.), Mass communication and society. (pp. 315–348). London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hier, S. P., & Greenberg, J. L. (2002). Constructing a discursive crisis: Risk, problematization and illegal Chinese in Canada. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25(3), 490–513.Google Scholar
  26. Immigration Legislative Review Advisory Group (1997). Not just numbers: A Canadian framework for future immigration. Ottawa: Ministry of Public Works and Government Services Canada.Google Scholar
  27. Jimenez, M. (2000a). Journey of desperation. National Post, March 30. p. B1.Google Scholar
  28. Jimenez, M. (2000b). Ottawa plans much looser refugee policy. National Post, March 11. p. A1.Google Scholar
  29. Jiménez, M. (2006). Women’s rights trump cultural habits, poll finds. Globe and Mail Nov. 14. Retrieved Nov. 14, 2006 from: www.globeandmail.ca.
  30. Kastner, S. (1997). Strangers in a strange land. The Toronto Star, May 31. p. L1.Google Scholar
  31. Kelley, N., & Trebilcock, M. J. (1998). The making of the mosaic: A history of Canadian immigration policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  32. Knowles, V. (1997). Strangers at our gates: Canadian immigration and immigration policy, 1540–1997. Toronto: Dundrun.Google Scholar
  33. Knowles, V. (2000). Forging our legacy. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada. Retrieved September 2006 from: www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/legacy/.
  34. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  35. Leon, L. (1998). ‘Pirate’ guides undercutting local tourism. The Ottawa Citizen, April 16. p. 5.Google Scholar
  36. Li, P. (2001). The racial subtext in Canada’s immigration discourse. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 2(1), 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li, P. (2003). Destination Canada: Immigration debates and issues. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Mahtani, M. (2001). Representing minorities: Canadian media and minority identities. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 33(3), 99–133.Google Scholar
  39. Mahtani, M., & Mountz, A. (2002). Immigration to British Columbia: Media representations and public opinion. Research on immigration and integration in the metropolis working paper series. No. 02-15.Google Scholar
  40. Mertl, S. (1996). Abuse of deportation laws feared: Canadian lawyers warn of arbitrary, secretive process. Calgary Herald, August 28. p. A9.Google Scholar
  41. Mitchell, D. (1995). There is no such thing as culture: Towards a reconceptualization of the idea of culture in geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 20, 102–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. National Post, (2000). $5M might work where Canada failed. April 7. p. A19.Google Scholar
  43. Naumetz, T. (2001). ‘All kinds’ here illegally, Ottawa says: The 27,000 deportation dodgers include more than just failed refugee claimants. Vancouver Sun, September 29. p. A9.Google Scholar
  44. Office of the Auditor General of Canada, (1997). Citizenship and immigration Canada and immigration and refugee board. News Release: Dec. 2. Retrieved September 2006 from: www.oag-bvg.gc.ca.
  45. Office of the Auditor General of Canada, (2000). Citizenship and immigration Canada—The economic component of the Canadian immigration program. Retrieved September 2006 from: www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/html/0003ce.html.
  46. Satzewich, V. (1991). Racism and the incorporation of foreign labour: Farm labour migration to Canada since 1945. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Sharma, N. (2006). Home economics: Nationalism and the making of ‘migrant workers’ in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  48. Statistics Canada, (2006). Table 292-0002: Labour force survey estimates (LFS), by sex and detailed age group, annual. E-STAT Data. Retrieved September 2006 from: http://estat.statcan.ca
  49. Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 7(17), no pages. Retrieved December 2006 from: http://pareonline.net
  50. Stoffman, D. (2002). Who gets in: What’s wrong with Canada’s immigration program—And how to fix it. Toronto: Macfarlane Walter & Ross.Google Scholar
  51. Suelman, Z. (1997). Who can give immigrants the best advice? Vancouver Sun, August 22. p. A19.Google Scholar
  52. Taylor, S. (2001). Locating and conducting discourse analytic research. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide to analysis (pp. 5–48). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. The Ottawa Citizen, (2001). Immigrant, refugee screening ‘a shocking, scandalous mess.’ October 30. p. A1.Google Scholar
  54. The Toronto Star, (1999). A mismanaged immigration department. August 12. p. 1.Google Scholar
  55. Thompson, A. (2001). We need the brightest, best. Toronto Star, Dec. 20. Retreived Dec. 20, 2001, from: http://www.thestar.ca.
  56. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, (1998). Comments on not just numbers: A Canadian framework for future immigration. Report of the Immigration Legislative Review Advisory Group. Retrieved September 2006 from: www.web.net/~ccr/hcrlegr.htm.
  57. van Dijk, T. A. (1987). Communicating racism. Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. van Dijk, T. A. (1991). Racism and the press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Veugelers, J. W. R. (2000). State-society relations in the making of Canadian immigration policy during the Mulroney era. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 37(1), 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  61. Wengeler, M. (1995). Multikulturelle Gesellschaft oder Ausländer raus? Der sprachliche Umgang mit der Einwanderung seit 1945. In G. Stötzel, & M. Wengeler (Eds.), Kontroverse Begriffe: Geschichte des öffentlichen Sprachgebrauchs in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (pp. 711–749). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  62. Wengeler, M. (2000). “Von Belastungen ‘...wirtschafltichem Nutzen’ und ...politischen Zielen.“‘Die öffentliche Einwanderungsdiskussion in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz Anfang der 70er Jahre. In T. Niehr, & K. Böke (Eds.), Einwanderungsdiskurse: Vergleichende diskurslinguistische Studien (pp. 135–157). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  63. Wengeler, M. (2003). Topos und Diskurs: Begründung einer argumentationsanalytischen Methode und ihre Anwendung auf den Migrationsdiskurs (1960–1985). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  64. Williams, R. (1983). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society, revised edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Wynnyckyj, A. K. (1998). Canada's Immigration Act under legislative review, “Not Just Numbers” report examined at hearings. Toronto Press Bureau. Retrieved September 2006 from: www.ukrweekly.com/Archive/1998/149802.shtml.
  66. Zolf, D. (1989). Comparisons of multicultural broadcasting in Canada and four other countries. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 21(2), 13–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations