Advertisement

On immigrant integration: Reply to Stoffman

  • Peter S. Li
Policy Debates
  • 102 Downloads

Abstract

In his critique of my argument on Canada’s immigration discourse, Daniel Stoffman raises two objections: his writings are misinterpreted and I offer no alternative to the assimiliationist view of integration. In this analysis, I show that Stoffman’s version of multiculturalism is exaggerated and his idea of culture and integration is misguided. I further show that true integration is neither about cultural conformity nor about cultural anarchism. Rather, true integration involves a democratic process which allows harmonious diversity to enrich people’s lives and permits conflicting differences to be settled lawfully and respectfully.

Key words

Integration Discourse Immigration Multiculturalism Canada 

Résumé

Dans sa critique de mon argument touchant le discours canadien sur l’immigration, Daniel Stoffman soulève deux objections: j’interprète mal ses écrits et je n’offre pas d’alternative à la vision assimilative de l’intégration. Cette analyse montrera que la version qu’offre Stoffman du multiculturalisme est exagérée et que l’idée qu’il se fait de la culture et de l’intégration est peu judicieuse. De plus, cet article démontre qu’une intégration véritable n’a rien à voir au conformisme culturel ni à l’anarchisme culturel. Une intégration véritable implique plutôt un processus démocratique qui admet l’enrichissement de la vie des gens par une diversité harmonieuse et qui permet le règlement légal et respectueux des différences conflictuelles.

Most-clefs

Discours Intégration Multiculturalisme 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Breton, R. (1988). The evolution of the Canadian multicultural society: The significance of government intervention. In A.J. Fry & C. Forceville (Eds.), Canadian mosaic: Essays on multiculturalism (pp. 25–44). Amsterdam: Free University Press.Google Scholar
  2. City Manager’s Report, City of Vancouver. (1988). RS-1/RS-1s regulations: Further adjustments to improve neighbourliness in single-family areas: Summary Report, submitted to the Standing Committee on Neighbourhood, Cutlural and Community Services, October 12.Google Scholar
  3. Citizenship and Immigration Canada. (2002). Performance report. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada.Google Scholar
  4. Collacott, M. (2002). Canada’s immigration policy: The need for major reform. Public Policy Sources (No. 64), Vancouver, BC: Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
  5. Director of Planning, City of Vancouver. (1990). RS-1/RS-1S Public hearing delegations, submitted to City Manager for Council, March 30.Google Scholar
  6. Director of Planning, City of Vancouver. (1992) Policy report to Standing Committee on Planning and Environment, March 18.Google Scholar
  7. Fleras, A. & J.L. Elliott (1992). Multiculturalism in Canada: The challenge of diversity. Scarborough, ON: Nelson Canada.Google Scholar
  8. Francis, D. (2002). Immigration: The economic case: Toronto, ON: Key Porter Books.Google Scholar
  9. Hoerder, D. (1999). Creating societies: Immigrant lives in Canada. Montreal, QD and Kingston, ON: McGill-Queen’s Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
  10. House of Commons Debates. (1971). 28th Parliament, 3rd Session, Friday, October, 1971, pp. 8545–8548Google Scholar
  11. Kallen, E. (1982). Multiculturalism: Ideology, policy and reality. Journal of Canadian Studies, 17(1), 51–63.Google Scholar
  12. Li, P.S. (1994a). A world apart: The multicultural world of visible minorities and the art world of Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 31, 365–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li, P.S. (1994b). Unneighbourly houses or unwelcome Chinese: The social construction of race in the battle over “monster homes” in Vancouver, Canada. International Journal of Comparative Race and Ethnic Studies, 1(1), 14–33.Google Scholar
  14. Li, P.S. (1998). The Chinese in Canada (2nd ed.), Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Li, P.S. (1999). The multiculturalism debate. In P.S. Li (Ed.), Race and ethnic relations in Canada (pp. 148–177). Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Li, P.S. (2001). The economics of minority language identity. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 33(3), 134–154.Google Scholar
  17. Li, P. (2003). Deconstructing Canada’s discourse of immigrant integration. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 4, 315–333.Google Scholar
  18. Ohannesian, P.B. (1990). Letter to Alderman Philip Owen, March 28, 1990, filed with the Planning Department, City of Vancouver.Google Scholar
  19. Statues of Canada. (1982). Constitution Act., Chapter 11.Google Scholar
  20. Stoffman, D. (2002). Who gets in: What’s wrong with Canada’s immigration program and how to fix it. Toronto, ON: Macfarlane Walter & Ross.Google Scholar
  21. United Nations Development Programme. (2004). Human development report 2004: Cultural liberty in today’s diverse world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer SBM 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter S. Li
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SaskatchewanCanada

Personalised recommendations