Canada’s private sponsorship of refugees program: A practitioners perspective of its past and future

  • Barbara Treviranus
  • Michael Casasola


Over its history, the private sponsorship program has been an important vehicle for Canada and Canadians in their response to refugees. It has been a flexible tool able to respond to both small and large-scale resettlement needs. The result is that thousands of refugees have found a durable solution in Canada. This article chronicles the evolution of this program. It argues that while the program is driven by the interest of Canadians to assist particular refugees, it is still in keeping with the international objectives of increasing and diversifying resettlement. It identifies a number of the challenges that program faces. Ultimately, it urges that the program be given greater attention and study so as to ensure that it is able to continue to provide additional refugees with a durable solution.

Key words

Refugee Resettlement Sponsorship NGO 


Depuis ses débuts, le programme de parrainage privé a constitué un moyen important par lequel le Canada et les Canadiens peuvent venir en aide aux réfugiés. Il s'est avéré un outil souple permettant de répondre aux besoins en réétablissement à petite et à grande échelle qu'avaient des milliers de réfugiés ayant trouvé des solutions durables au Canada. Dans cet article, on trace l'évolution de ce programme en faisant valoir que, même si le programme est motivé par l'intérêt qu'ont les Canadiens de venir en aide à certains réfugiés en particulier, il fonctionne néanmoins conformément aux objectifs internationaux visant l'augmentation et la diversification du réétablissement. On y distingue nombre des défis que le programme doit affronter. Finalement, on recommande vivement que le programme fase l'objet d'une étude approfondie pour s'assurer qu'il soit en mesure de continuer à offrir à davantage de réfugiés des solutions durables.


Réfugié Réétablissement Parrainage ONG 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abu-Laban, B., Derwing, T., Mulder, M. & Northcott, H.C. (2001). Lessons Learned: An Evaluation of Northern Alberta's Experience with Kosovar Refugees: A Study Prepared for Citizenship and Immigration Canada, May 31, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. Adelman H. (1982). Canada and the Indochinese Refugees. Regina: L.A. Weigl Education Associates Ltd.Google Scholar
  3. British Columbia Ministry of Multiculturalism and Immigration, Citizenship and Immigration Canada (2002). Kosovar Settlement in British Columbia.Google Scholar
  4. Canadian Council for Refugees (1992). Report of the Task Force on Overseas Protection, Montreal.Google Scholar
  5. Casasola, M. (1998). Legislative Review, New Directions and Refugee Resettlement. Refuge 18 (1), 18–23.Google Scholar
  6. Centre for International Statistics (1998). Changing Labour Market Prospects of Refugees in Canada. Canadian Council on Social Development for Strategic Policy Planning and Research, March 1998.Google Scholar
  7. Centre for Refugee Studies (CRS) York University and Joint Centre of Excellence for Research on Immigration and Settlement (CERIS) York University (2001). A Report on the Experience of Sponsors of Kosovar Refugees in Ontario.Google Scholar
  8. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (1998a). Building on a Strong Foundation for the 21st Century: New Direction for Immigration and Refugee Policy and Legislation.Google Scholar
  9. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (1998b). Not Just Numbers: A Canadian Framework for Future Immigration-Final Report of the Immigration Legislative Review Advisory Group.Google Scholar
  10. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (2000a). Chapter OP4: Overseas Selection and Processing of Convention Refugees Seeking Resettlement and Members of the Humanitarian Designated Classes. April 2000Google Scholar
  11. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (2001b). Module 7: Private Sponsorship Basic Overseas Refugee Processing.Google Scholar
  12. Citizenship and Immigration Canada. (2002a). Annual Report to Parliament on Immigration. Ottawa.Google Scholar
  13. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (2002b). Facts and Figures 2001: Immigration Overview. Ottawa.Google Scholar
  14. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (2002a). News Release: Innovative Pilot Program to Assist Refugees. 2002–47.Google Scholar
  15. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (2002b). Speaking Notes for SAH Forum November 2002, Calgary, Theme: Moving Forward.Google Scholar
  16. Consulting and Audit Canada (1998). Report on the Evaluation of Project Focus Afghanistan. Prepared for Citizenship and Immigration Canada.Google Scholar
  17. Consulting and Audit Canada (2002). Analysis of a Sample of Refugee Sponsors. Prepared for Citizenship and immigration Canada, March 2002, unpublished report.Google Scholar
  18. Dewitt D. & Kirton, J (1983). Canada as a Principal Power, Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  19. Dirks, G. (1984). Identification and Admission of Refugees to Canada, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 17(2), (June 1984).Google Scholar
  20. Dirks, G. (1995). Controversy and Complexity: Canadian Immigration Policy during the 1980's. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Employment and Immigration Canada (1991). Private Sponsorship of Refugees National Consultation Report.Google Scholar
  22. Employment and Immigration Canada (1992). Discussion Paper: Private Sponsorhip of Refugees Program.Google Scholar
  23. Hetfield, M. (2002). What is to Blame for Empty Seats on the Resettlement Lifeboat: Rigid Criteria, or Inefficient Identification? UNHCR Annual Tripartite Consultations on Resettlement, Geneva 18–19 June 2002.Google Scholar
  24. Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, 2002.Google Scholar
  25. Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, 2002.Google Scholar
  26. Jamieson, Beals, Lalonde & Associates (1996), CIC Evaluation of the 3/9 Refugee Sponsorship Programme Final Report, August 1996.Google Scholar
  27. Pinnacle Group (2002). Partners in Settlement of Privately Sponsored Refugees in Ontario Conference-CIC-OASIS-Feb& 5, 2002, Final Report.Google Scholar
  28. Robinson, W. C. (1998). Terms of Refuge: The Indochinese Exodus and the International Response. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  29. UNHCR, (2000). Background Note for the Agenda Item: Reflection on the Changing Nature of Resettlement and the Impact upon the Operational Environment, Annual Tripartite Consultations on Resettlement, Geneva, 3 July 2000.Google Scholar
  30. UNHCR (2002a). An Easy Guide to Refugee Resettlement Programmes.Google Scholar
  31. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2002). Resettlement Handbook (rev.).Google Scholar
  32. UNHCR (2002b). Refugee Resettlement: An International Handbook to Guide Reception and Integration.Google Scholar
  33. UNHCR (2002c). Strengthening and Expanding Resettlement today: Dilemmas, Challenges and Opportunities. Global Consultations on International Protection, 25 April 2002.Google Scholar
  34. Van Staalduinen, B. (1994). Discussion Draft: Project Report on the Private Sponsorship of Refugees-A Report to the ADMISC. Unpublished report.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer SBM 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Treviranus
  • Michael Casasola

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations