Metaphysica

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 63–78 | Cite as

A Novel Interpretation of Plato’s Theory of Forms

Article

Abstract

In several recent issues of this journal, I argued for an account of property possession as strict, numerical identity. While this account has stuck some as being highly idiosyncratic in nature, it is not entirely something new under the sun, since as I will argue in this paper, it turns out to have a historic precedent in Plato’s theory of forms. Indeed, the purpose of this paper is twofold. The first is to show that my account of property possession can be utilized to provide a novel interpretation of Plato’s theory of forms. And the second is to show that once it has been divorced from a variety of implausible doctrines with which it has historically been wedded, Plato’s central insight that all properties possess themselves, far from being of mere historical interest, is independently plausible, ironically enough, even from an empirical point of view.

References

  1. Aristotle (translated by Apostle): (1966) Metaphysics, Peripatetic PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, David: (1978a) Nominalism and Realism, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, David: (1978b) A Theory of Universals, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bacon, John: (1995) Universals and Property Instances, Blackwell Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ehring, Douglas: (2002) “Spatially Related Universals,” in the Australasian Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  6. Fales, Evan: (1990) Causation and Universals, Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  7. Paul, L.A. (2002):“Logical Parts” in Nous 36:4 (2002) pp. 578–596.Google Scholar
  8. Plato (translated by Hamilton and Cairns): (1961) The Complete Dialogues of Plato, Random House.Google Scholar
  9. Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo (2002): Resemblance Nominalism, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Simons, Peter: (1987) Parts, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Spellman, Lynne (1995): Substance and Separation in Aristotle, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations