, 10:175

Endurance Per Se in B-time


DOI: 10.1007/s12133-009-0049-z

Cite this article as:
Hansson Wahlberg, T. Int Ontology Metaphysics (2009) 10: 175. doi:10.1007/s12133-009-0049-z


Three arguments for the conclusion that objects cannot endure in B-time even if they remain intrinsically unchanged are examined: Carter and Hestevold’s enduring-objects-as-universals argument (American Philosophical Quarterly 31(4):269–283, 1994) and Barker and Dowe’s paradox 1 and paradox 2 (Analysis 63(2):106–114, 2003, Analysis 65(1):69–74, 2005). All three are shown to fail.


B-time Endurance Mereology Paradox Persistence Universals  

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations