Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Land Governance and Decentralised Physical Planning in mid-Sized Cities in Ghana: a Case Study of the Nkoranza South Municipality

  • Published:
Urban Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physical planning is influenced by a number of variables. The key among these in the Ghanaian context is the system of land governance. This paper attempts to examine the extent to which the decentralised planning system of Ghana is capable of addressing the challenges facing mid-sized cities, particularly under the reformed land governance system. This is important because physical planning in Ghana is organised under a system whereby land is governed and/or owned by authorities other than the state apparatus. Two key questions are the basis for this enquiry–how is physical planning in Ghana conceived and actually executed? What are the characteristics of the reformed land governance system of Ghana and how have these affected decentralised physical planning and spatial governance? A case study approach which enables a detailed and holistic analysis of the phenomenon was used to investigate physical planning practice in a selected mid-sized city in Ghana. The study establishes that physical planning in Ghana is not driven by long-term sustainable development visions; there is the absence of planning concepts, principles and norms; and there is no clear land use regulator. The study recommends that the local government bodies in Ghana take up their responsibility as land use regulators by improving the capacity of their physical planning departments to deliver on their mandate. It is also recommended that physical planning be conducted in a participatory manner within the framework of the National Development Planning (Systems) Act 1994 (Act 480). It is argued that this will imply a move away from “zoning and rezoning” to strategic spatial planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alhassan, M. (2011). The legal and institutional changes for town and country planning in Ghana. Paper presented at the Training Physical Planners and Technical Staff Workshop. Ghana: Takoradi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anaafo, D. (2015). Land reforms and land rights change: a case study of land stressed groups in the Nkoranza South Municipality, Ghana. Land Use Policy, 42, 538–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batten, D. F. (1995). Network cities: creative urban agglomerations for the 21st century. Urban Studies, 32(2), 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchemin, C., & Bocquier, P. (2004). Migration and urbanisation in Francophone West Africa: an overview of the recent empirical evidence. Urban Studies, 41(11), 2245–2272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauregard, R. A. (1987). The object of planning. Urban Geography, 8(4), 367–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S. (1997). Tomatoes, land and hearsay: property and history in Asante in the time of structural adjustment. World Development, 25(8), 1225–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertolini, L. (2007). Evolutionary urban transportation planning: an exploration. Environment and Planning, 39(8), 1998–2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blotcher, J. (2006). Building on custom: land tenure policy and economic development in Ghana. Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, 9, 166–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., & Mayer, M. (2009). Cities for people, not for profit. City, 13(2–3), 176–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, J. W. (1988). A perspective on indigenous land tenure systems and land concentration. In R. E. Downs & S. P. Reyna (Eds.), Land and society in contemporary Africa. University Press of New England: Published for University of New Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, G. (2004). Democratic decentralisation in Ghana: issues and prospects. POLIS Working Paper, 9, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devas, N. (1993). Evolving approaches. In N. Devas & C. Rakodi (Eds.), Managing fast-growing cities. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., Ericksen, N., Crawford, J., & Berke, P. (1997). Planning under a cooperative mandate: new plans for New Zealand. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 40(5), 603–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Africa. (2004). Land tenure systems and their impacts on food security and sustainable development in Africa. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: ECA Printshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1967). Mixed-scanning: a “Third” approach to decision-making. Public Administration Review, 27(5), 385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (2009). Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy. Urban Studies, 46(5–6), 1003–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. S. (2000). New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35(4), 451–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, D. (2005). ‘Best practice’ options for the legal recognition of customary tenure. Development and Change, 36(3), 449–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power: University of California Press.

  • Friedmann, J. (1998). Planning theory revisited*. European Planning Studies, 6(3), 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghana Statistical Service. (2012). 2010 Population and housing census report. Accra: Ghana Statistical Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, B. (2001). Devolution and state planning systems in Australia. International Planning Studies, 6(2), 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, B., & Low, N. P. (2000). Australian planning: new challenges, new agendas. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Ghana. (1993). Local Government Act, 1992 (Act 462). Accra: Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P. (2006). On the edge of reason: planning and urban futures in Africa. Urban Studies, 43(2), 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P., Todes, A., & Watson, V. (2008). Planning and transformation. Lessons from the South African experience. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2004). The treatment of space and place in new strategic spatial planning in Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1), 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2006). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: towards a relational planning for our times. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2010). Making better places: the planning project in the twenty-first century: Palgrave Macmillan

  • Hillier, J. (2008). Plan (e) speaking: a multiplanar theory of spatial planning. Planning Theory, 7(1), 24–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, E. (1965). Garden cities of to-morrow (Vol. 23): MIT Press.

  • Jepson, E. J. (2004). The adoption of sustainable development policies and techniques in US cities–how wide, how deep, and what role for planners? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(3), 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasanga, K., & Kotey, N. A. (2001). Land management in Ghana: building on tradition and modernity. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Clercq, F., & Bertolini, L. (2003). Achieving sustainable accessibility: an evaluation of policy measures in the Amsterdam area. Built Environment (1978-), 36–47.

  • Mattingly, M. (2001). Spatial planing for urban infrastructure planning and investment: a guide to training and practice. London: Development Planning Unit, London University College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, M., & Winarso, H. (2000). Urban spatial planning and public capital investments: the experience of Indonesia’s integrated urban infrastructure investment programme. Unit Working Paper 113. London: London University College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, P. (2002). Social life and urban form in a historical perspective. Paper presented at the Proceedings from 3rd Umeå Conference in Urban Design: “Towards a New Urbanism in Sweden.”

  • Nadin, V. (2003). Spatial planning and sustainable development. Asturias: Paper presented at the Presentation to the European Regional Sustainable Development Network Policy Seminar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadin, V. (2007). The emergence of the spatial planning approach in England. Planning, Practice & Research, 22(1), 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nkoranza South Municipal Assembly. (2010). District medium term development plan, 2010–2013. Nkoranza South Municipal Assembly

  • Roy, A. (2009).Why India cannot plan its cities: informality,insurgence and the idiom of urbanisation. Planning Theory, 8(1), 76–87.

  • Sarpong, G. A. (1999). The legal framework for participatory planning: final report on the legal aspects of land tenure, planning and management in Ghana. Retrieved March 13, 2013 www.fao.org/docrep/005/y3872e/y3872e0e.htm

  • Scott, D. (2003). ‘Creative Destruction’: early modernist planning in the south Durban industrial zone, South Africa. Southern African Studies, 29(1), 235–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todes, A. (2011). Reinventing planning: critical reflections. Paper presented at the Urban Forum.

  • Todes, A., Pillay, C., & Krone, A. (2003). Urban restructuring and land availability. In F. Khan & P. Thring (Eds.), Housing policy and practice in South Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todes, A., Karam, A., Klug, N., & Malaza, N. (2010). Beyond master planning? New approaches to spatial planning in Ekurhuleni, South Africa. Habitat International, 34(4), 414–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonah, S. (2002). Fulani pastoralists, indigenous farmers and the contest for land in Northern Ghana. Africa Spectrum, 37(1), 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, C. (2006). Securing land and property rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: the role of local institutions. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trebilcock, M. J. (1984). Communal property rights: the Papua New Guinean experience. The University of Toronto Law Journal, 34(4), 377–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turok, I. (2000). Persistent polarisation post-apartheid? Progress towards urban integration in Cape Town, urban change and policy research group discussion paper 1. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.

  • Ubink, J. M., & Amanor, K. (Eds.). (2008). Contesting land and custom in Ghana: state, chief and the citizen: Amsterdam University Press.

  • UN-Habitat. (2006). The state of the world’s cities 2006/7. The millennium development goals and urban sustainability. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat. (2009). Global report on human settlements 2009: planning sustainable cities. Nairobi: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver Declaration. (2006). Reinventing planning: a new governance paradigm for managing human settlements.

  • Watson, V. (2008). Introduction, draft chapter for the global report on human settlements: revisiting planning. Nairobi: Report to the UN-HABITAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, V. (2009). ‘The planned city sweeps the poor away…’: urban planning and 21st century urbanisation. Progress in Planning, 72(3), 151–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Anaafo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anaafo, D., Inkoom, D.K.B. Land Governance and Decentralised Physical Planning in mid-Sized Cities in Ghana: a Case Study of the Nkoranza South Municipality. Urban Forum 27, 93–111 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-015-9267-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-015-9267-3

Keywords

Navigation