Accommodation and Tenuous Livelihoods in Johannesburg’s Inner City: the ‘Rooms’ and ‘Spaces’ Typologies

Abstract

‘Rooms’ and ‘spaces’ are two closely linked forms of accommodation where the unit of occupation and exchange is a portion of a larger building or property, within which services and facilities are shared. Through participant observation and qualitative interviews, this study explores two buildings featuring informal rooms and spaces and one building featuring formal rooms and spaces in Johannesburg’s inner city. The research demonstrated the incredible resilience of occupants in the face of an extreme shortage of affordable accommodation in Johannesburg’s inner city (Tissington 2013). Rooms and spaces in the inner city represented two of very few typologies research participants were aware of that allowed them access to the livelihood opportunities Johannesburg had to offer. The flexibility and diversity of rooms and spaces on the informal market enabled occupants to cope with insecure livelihood opportunities. While formal rooms represented the most stable support to those specific occupants, there were several ‘barriers to entry’ including the prerequisite of a stable income. However, the findings suggested an adverse relationship between accommodation and livelihoods demonstrated by the three ‘forms’ of rooms and spaces, where the only form available to people with the least secure livelihoods is that which, in turn, subjects them to the greatest insecurity. While one should ‘do no harm’ where aspects of accommodation are ‘currently working’ (Carey 2009:2), there is scope for targeted and differentiated intervention in some forms of rooms and spaces, in support of livelihoods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Notes

  1. 1.

    This report utilises the geographical boundaries of the ‘inner city’ as stipulated by the City of Johannesburg (2004a), from Yeoville and Braamfontein in the north to Marshalltown and Benrose in the south, and Vrededorp and Fordsburg in the west to Jeppestown, Bertams and Troyeville in the east.

  2. 2.

    In this report, ‘interviewee’ refers to a person who interviewed as part of the more formal semi-structure in-depth interviews. ‘Participant’ refers to a ‘general’ participant spoken to during participant observation. The term ‘participants’ is used to refer to both interviewees and general participants.

  3. 3.

    The mean number of residential moves for migrants since coming to Johannesburg was 7.5 times. Only around 13 % expected to be in the same accommodation within the next 2 years (Greenburg and Polzner 2008).

  4. 4.

    That is, additional volatility, and a cause of additional stresses or shocks for occupants.

  5. 5.

    In Indonesia, according to a 1985 study (Hoffman et al. 1991; cited by Rakodi 2002), one third of renters had monthly tenancies, while half were required to make advance payments—generally a full year’s rent.

  6. 6.

    Similarly, in tenements in Nairobi (Huchzermeyer 2011) when the tenant does not pay rent warnings will be issued, after which an ‘auctioneer’ will throw the tenant out and attempt to recover arrears from their assets.

  7. 7.

    The PIE Act (1998) and linked rulings stipulate that evictions require a court order, and must be carried out by the court sheriff. The municipality is required to provide alternative accommodation to evictees who would be rendered homeless, and an eviction cannot go forward until this accommodation is provided.

  8. 8.

    UN-Habitat (2003: 121) contends that ‘poor families are prepared to live in appalling housing conditions because they have higher priorities than housing, such as educating the children or setting up a business’.

  9. 9.

    A shebeen usually refers to an informal drinking place where one can buy alcohol, similar to a ‘tavern’.

  10. 10.

    The ‘Blue Moonlight’ (2012) and ‘Olivia Road’ (2008) judgements are particularly pertinent.

References

  1. Aina, T. A. (1990). Petty landlords and poor tenants in a low–income settlement in Metropolitan Lagos, Nigeria. In P. Amis & P. Lloyd (Eds.), Housing Africa’s urban poor. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andreasen, J. (1989). The poor don't squat: the case of Thika, Kenya. Environment and Urbanization, 1(2), 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bank, L. (2007). The rhythms of the yards: urbanism, backyards and housing policy in South Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 25(2), 205–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baumann, T. (2003). Housing policy and poverty in South Africa. In F. Khan & P. Thring (Eds.), Housing policy and practice in post-apartheid South Africa. Johannesburg: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beall, J., & Kanji, N. (1999). Househlds, livelihoods and urban poverty. Urban governance, partnership and poverty, Theme Paper 3. United Kingdom: Department for International Development (DFID).

  6. Berner, E. (2001). Learning from informal markets: innovative approaches to land and housing provision. Development in Practice, 11(2), 292–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, A., & Lloyd-Jones, T. (2002). Spacial planning, access and infrastructure. In C.Rakodi & T. Lloyd-Jones, T (Eds)., Urban Livelihoods: A People-centred Approach toReducing Poverty. London: Earthscan Publications.

  8. Cadstedt, J. (2010). Private rental housing in Tanzania—a private matter? Habitat International, 34(1), 46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carey, S. (2009). Investigation into the proliferation of low-income private rental housing supply, and the development of recommendations concerning appropriate interventions/responses. The Social Housing Foundation and Urban Landmark.

  10. Chambers, R. (1995). Poverty and livelihoods: whose reality counts? Environment and Urbanization, 7(1), 173–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. City of Johannesburg. (2004a). Guide to the urban development zone tax incentive for the Johannesburg Inner City. http://www.joburg.org.za/udz/guide.pdf. Accessed 19 Nov 2013

  12. City of Johannesburg. (2004b). Public Health By-laws. Published in Provincial Gazette Extraordinary No. 179, 21 May 2004. Pretoria: Government Gazette.

  13. City of Johannesburg. (2013). Inner city transformation roadmap: a place of opportunity. Final Draft 17 Feb 2013. http://joburgtraderesources.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/coj-inner-city-roadmap_final-draft_17-feb-2013.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2014

  14. City of Johannesburg. (2014). By-law on problem properties. Published in Provincial Gazette Extraordinary No. 167, 20 June 2014. Pretoria: Government Gazette.

  15. City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Blue Moonlight 39 (Pty) Ltd and Another 2012 (2) SA 104 (CC).

  16. COHRE. (2005). Any room for the poor? Forced evictions in Johannesburg, South Africa. Johannesburg: Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Community Law Centre (CLC) and Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa (SERI) (2013) ‘Jumping the Queue’, Waiting Lists and other Myths: Perceptions and Practice around Housing Demand and Allocation in South Africa. p 80. Accessed from http://www.seri-sa.org/images/Jumping_the_Queue_MainReport_Jul13.pdf

  18. Curnow R., & Joy O. (2013). Johannesburg’s crime hotspot transformed to hipsterhangout. CNN Marketplace Africa, 4 November 2013.

  19. Custers, G. (2001). Inner-city rental housing in Lima: a portrayal and an explanation. Cities, 18(4), 249–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dercon, S. (2000). Income risk, coping strategies and safety nets. Background paper World Development Report 2000/01. Centre for the Study of African Economies, Oxford University.

  21. Dewar, D. (1997). The vexatious question of rental housing. Urban Forum, 8(1), 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. DFID [Department for International Development]. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. http://www.ennonline.net/resources/667. Accessed 2 Nov 2012

  23. DHS Department of Human Settlements. (2004). Breaking new ground: A comprehensive strategy for housing delivery. http://www.nwpg.gov.za/DDLG&TA/acts/Breaking%20New%20Grounds.pdf. Accessed 10 August 2013.

  24. eProp. (2012). Johannesburg inner city restoration shows steady progress. 19 July2012. Retrieved 2 March 2014. From http://www.eprop.co.za/index.php/news/item/14175-johannesburg-inner-cityrestoration-shows-steady-progress.

  25. Few, R., Gouveia, N., Mathee, A., Harpham, T., Cohn, A., Swart, A., & Coulson, N. (2004). Informal sub-division of residential and commercial buildings in Sao Paulo and Johannesburg: living conditions and policy implications. Habitat International, 28(3), 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Follain, J., Lim, G., & Renaud, B. (1982). Housing crowding in developing countries and willingness to pay for additional space. Journal of Development Economics, 11(2), 249–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gordon, R., & Nell, M. (2006). Small-scale landlords: research findings and recommendations. Submitted by Shisaka Development Management Services and CSIR Built Environment.

  28. Grant, M. (1995). Movement patterns and the medium-sized city: tenants on the movein Gweru, Zimbabwe. Habitat International, 19(3), 357–369.

  29. Grant, M. (1996). Vulnerability and privilege: transitions in the supply pattern of rental shelter in a mid-sized Zimbabwean city. Geoforum, 27(2), 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Grant, M. (2007). Lodging as a migrant economic strategy in urban Zimbabwe. Development Southern Africa, 24(1), 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Greenburg, J., & Polzer, T. (2008). Migrant Access to Housing in South African Cities.Migrant Rights Monitoring Project, Forced Migration Studies Programme,Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University.

  32. Hellman, E. (1935). Native life in a Johannesburg slum yard. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, 8(1), 34–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Huchzermeyer, M. (2011). Tenement cities: From 19th century Berlin to 21st century Nairobi. Trenton: Africa World Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hungwe, C. (2013). Surviving social exclusion: Zimbabwean migrants in Johannesburg, South Africa. Dissertation submitted for a Doctor of Literature and Philosophy in the subject of Sociology, University of South Africa.

  35. IRIN. (2011). South Africa: Slumming it in Jo’burg. IRIN humanitarian news and analysis. 2 June 2011. http://www.irinnews.org/printreport.aspx?ReportID=92875. Accessed 12 Dec 2012

  36. Korboe, D. (1992). Rent-free tenure in urban Ghana: problem or solution? Forum, 1, 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lemanski, C. (2009). Augmented informality: South Africa’s backyard dwellings as a by-product of formal housing policies. Habitat International, 33, 472–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lim, G., Follain, J. and Renaud, B. (1984). Economics of residential crowding indeveloping countries. Journal of Urban Economics 16(2), 173–186.

  39. Lund, C., Ramogayane, R., Poulsen, L., & Brand, D. (2004). Exploring transitional and communal housing as a form of social housing in South Africa. Johannesburg: Social Housing Foundation. (Social Housing Foundation Research Series).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mabin, A. (1990). Limits of the urban transition models in understanding South Africanurbanisation. Development Southern Africa, 7(3), 311–22.

  41. Macoloo, G. (1991). The transformation of production and retail of building materials for low-income housing in Mombasa, Kenya. Development and Change, 22(3), 445–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Maree, J. (2012). Complete your dissertation or thesis successfully: practical guidelines. Cape Town: Juta.

    Google Scholar 

  43. McCallum, D., & Benjamin, S. (1985). Low-income urban housing in the Third World:broadening the economic perspective. Urban Studies 22, 277–287.

  44. Mkahabela, S., & Dörmann, K. (Under Review). In Benit-Gbaffou C., & Doerman K. (Eds)., Yeoville Stories. Pretoria: UNISA Press.

  45. Moser, C. (1998). The asset vulnerability framework: reassessing urban poverty reduction strategies. World Development, 21(6), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. National Department of Human Settlements. (2009). National Housing Code. http://www.dhs.gov.za/content/national-housing-code-2009. Accessed 3 Nov 2013

  47. Occupiers of 51 Olivia Road, Berea Township and 197 Main Street, Johannesburg v City of Johannesburg and Others 2008 (3) SA 208 (CC).

  48. Payne, G. (2002). Tenure and shelter in urban livelihoods. In C. Rakodi & T. Lloyd-Jones (Eds.), Urban livelihoods: a people-centred approach to reducing poverty. London: Earthscan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act No.19 of 1998. Government Gazette 18964, 5 June 1998.

  50. Potts, D. (2000). Urban unemployment and migrants in Africa: evidence from Harare 1985–1994. Development and Change, 31(4), 879–910.

  51. Poulsen, L. (2010). A room in the city: strategies for accessing affordable accommodation. Urban Forum, 21, 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rakodi, C. (1995). Rental tenure in cities of developing countries. Urban Studies, 32(4), 791–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rakodi, C. (2002). A livelihoods approach—conceptual issues and definitions. In C. Rakodi (Ed.), Urban livelihoods: a people-centred approach to reducing poverty. London: Earthscan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ross, N., Bowen, P. and Lincoln, D. 2010. Sustainable housing for low income communities: lessons for South Africa and other developing world cases. Construction Management and Economics 28(5), 443–449.

  56. Rust, K., Zack, T., & Napier, M. (2009). How a focus on asset performance might help ‘Breaking New Ground’ contribute towards poverty reduction and overcome the two-economies divide. Town and Regional Planning, 54, 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Schlyter, A. (2003). Multi-habitation: Urban housing and everyday life in Chitungwiza, Zimbabwe. Research Report No. 123 Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet. (NAI Research Reports).

  58. Shapurjee, Y., & Charlton, S. (2013). Transforming South Africa’s low-income housing projects through backyard dwellings: intersections with households and the state in Alexandra, Johannesburg. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 28(4), 653–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Silverman, M., & Zack, T. (2007). Land use management in the city of Johannesburg. Case study: Hillbrow and Berea. Johannesburg: Wits Centre for Urban and Built Environment Studies and Planact.

    Google Scholar 

  60. South Africa. (1998) Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act No.19 of 1998. Government Gazette 18964, 5 June 1998.

  61. Tipple, G., & Willis, K. (1992). Why should Ghanaians build houses in urban areas? Anintroduction to private sector housing supply in Ghana. Cities, 2, 60–74.

  62. Tipple, G., Amole, B., Korboe, D., & Onyeacholem, H. (1994). House and dwelling, family and household: towards defining housing units in West African cities. Third World Planning Review, 16(4), 587–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Tissington, K. (2013). Minding the Gap: An analysis of the supply of and demand for low-income rental accommodation in inner city Johannesburg. Johannesburg: Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Trafalgar (2006). Inner City Report: A Tenant Survey.UN-Habitat [United Nations Human Settlements Programme]. (2003). Rental housing—an essential option for the urban poor in developing countries. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.

  65. Wang, D., & Li, S. M. (2006), Socio-economic differentials and stated housing preferences in Guangzhou, China. Habitat International, 30(2), 305–326.

  66. Withers, P. (1992). Housing situation and aspirations for non-owner households in Harare and Gweru. Harare, University of Zimbabwe, Department of Rural and Urban Planning.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Sizwe Mayson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mayson, S.S., Charlton, S. Accommodation and Tenuous Livelihoods in Johannesburg’s Inner City: the ‘Rooms’ and ‘Spaces’ Typologies. Urban Forum 26, 343–372 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-015-9250-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Informal rental
  • Housing
  • Johannesburg
  • Multi-habitation
  • Rooms
  • Livelihoods