Skip to main content

Competing for Knowledge: Leaders and Laggards of Bus Rapid Transit in South Africa

Abstract

Building on the substantial body of literature on policy mobilities, this paper attends to the circulation of bus rapid transit (BRT) as it swept through South African cities to reconsider the power of the interactions between municipalities and their policy actors in the determination to adopt circulated forms of knowledge. Such debates deepen and widen the space through which policy flows by proposing that local competitive interactions and relationships shape the circulation process. The paper utilizes evidence of municipal diplomacy, which includes partisan contestation between rival parties, limited financial resources and insufficient technical expertise, to suggest that both governmental and personal alignments were the driving force for BRT adoption. It then goes on to provide evidence of the neglected opportunities to exchange knowledge across South African localities, outcomes indicative of wider political manoeuvrings. Unravelling the engagements across South African cities adds a critical dimension to understandings of urban policy mobilities by explaining why, and with what consequences, learning brings certain cities into conversation with one another while pushing others further apart. Under such instances, cities are not merely importers or exporters of policy but part of the wider system of power relations in which policy circulates. This application of policy circulation makes an important contribution to studies of the post-apartheid city by providing an alternative theorization of South African inter-urban hierarchies and relationality.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: conformity, fads, and information cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 151–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boraine, A., Crankshaw, O., Engelbrecht, C., Gotz, G., Mbanga, S., Narsoo, M., & Parnell, S. (2006). The State of South African cities a decade after democracy. Urban Studies, 43(2), 259–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, N. (2010). Town twinning in cold-war Britain: (dis)continuities in twentieth-century municipal internationalism. Contemporary British History, 24(2), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke, N. (2011). Globalizing care? Town twinning in Britain since 1945. Geoforum, 42, 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook, I. R. (2010). Policing, partnerships and profits: the operations of business improvement districts and town center management schemes in England. Urban Geography, 31(4), 453–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Department of Transport. (1996). White paper on national transport policy. Pretoria: Department of Transport.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Department of Transport. (1999). Moving South Africa: a transport strategy for 2020. Pretoria: Department of Transport.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Department of Transport. (2000). National Land Transport Transition Act. Pretoria: Department of Transport.

  11. Department of Transport. (2009). National Land Transport Act. Pretoria: Department of Transport.

  12. Didier, S., Peyroux, E., & Morange, M. (2012). The spreading of the city improvement district model in Johannesburg and Cape Town: urban regeneration and the neoliberal agenda in South Africa. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(5), 915–935. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01136.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: a review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44, 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dye, T. R. (1990). American federalism: competition among governments. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ewen, S., & Hebbert, M. (2007). European cities in a networked world during the long 20th century. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25, 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gaspari, O. (2002). Cities against states? Hopes, dreams and shortcomings of the European municipal movement, 1900–1960. Contemporary European History, 11, 597–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gilbert, A. (2002). “Scan globally; reinvent locally”: reflecting on the origins of South Africa’s capital housing subsidy policy. Urban Studies, 10, 1911–1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. González, S. (2011). Bilbao and Barcelona “in motion”: how urban regeneration “models” travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism. Urban Studies, 48(7), 1397–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guggenheim, M., & Söderström, O. (Eds.). (2010). Re-shaping cities: how global mobility transforms architecture and urban form. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hagerstrand, T. (1967). Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hitge, G., & Gqaji, A. (2011). Impact of a transport system and urban form on the population of a city. Presented at the Southern Africa Transport Conference, Tshwane, South Africa.

  23. Holtzhausen, L. J., & Abrahamson, A. D. (2011). Municipal public transport in Cape Town: institutional arrangements. Presented at the Southern Africa Transport Conference, Tshwane, South Africa.

  24. Huat, C. B. (2011). Singapore as model: planning innovations, knowledge experts. In A. Roy & A. Ong (Eds.), World cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global (pp. 29–54). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jacobs, J. M. (2012). Urban geographies I: still thinking cities relationally. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3), 412–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. John, L. (2012). Secondary cities in South Africa: the start of a conversation. Johannesburg: South African Cities Network.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Maunganidze, L., & Del Mistro, R. (2012). The role of bus rapid transit in improving public transport levels of service, particularly for the urban poor users of public transport: a case of Cape Town, South Africa. Presented at the Southern Africa Transport Conference, Tshwane, South Africa.

  28. Mbembe, A. (2004). Aesthetics of superfluidity. Public Culture, 16, 373–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McCann, E. (2004). “Best places”: interurban competition, quality of life and population media discourse. Urban Studies, 41, 1909–1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McCann, E. (2008). Expertise, truth, and urban policy mobilities: global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada’s “four pillar” drug strategy. Environment & Planning A, 40, 885–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McCann, E. (2011a). Points of reference: knowledge of elsewhere in the politics of urban drug policy. In E. McCann & K. Ward (Eds.), Mobile urbanism: cities and policymaking in the global age (pp. 97–122). Minneapolis: Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. McCann, E. (2011b). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McCann, E. (2013). Policy boosterism, policy mobilities, and the extrospective city. Urban Geography, 34(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2010). Relationality/territoriality: towards a conceptualization of cities in the world. Geoforum, 41(2), 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. McCann, E., & Ward, K. (Eds.). (2011). Mobile urbanism: cities and policymaking in the global age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. McFarlane, C. (2010). The comparative city: knowledge, learning, urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 725–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. National Planning Commission. (2011). Diagnosis overview. Pretoria: National Planning Commission in the Presidency.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nevhutanda, A. (2007). Impact of rapid urbanisation of South African cities on their transport policies: a theoretical perspective. Presented at the Southern Africa Transport Conference, Tshwane, South Africa.

  39. Parnell, S., Pieterse, E., Swilling, M., & Wooldridge, D. (Eds.). (2002). Democratising local government: the South African experiment. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Peck, J. (2011a). Creative moments: working culture, through municipal socialism and neoliberal urbanism. In E. McCann & K. Ward (Eds.), Mobile urbanism: cities and policymaking in the global age (pp. 41–70). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Peck, J. (2011b). Geographies of policy: from transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2001). Exporting workfare/importing welfare-to-work: exploring the politics of third way policy transfer. Political Geography, 20, 427–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010a). Mobilizing policy: models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41(2), 169–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010b). Recombinant workfare, across the Americas: transnationalizing “fast” social policy. Geoforum, 41(2), 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Peyroux, E., Pütz, R., & Glasze, G. (2012). Business improvement districts (BIDs): the internationalization and contextualization of a “travelling concept”. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(2), 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pirie, G. (2010). Trajectories of north–south city inter-relations: Johannesburg and Cape Town, 1994–2007. Urban Studies, 47(9), 1985–2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Robertson, D. B. (1991). Political conflict and lesson-drawing. Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Robinson, J. (1997). The geopolitics of South African cities: states, citizens, territory. Political Geography, 16(5), 365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Robinson, J. (2011a). Cities in a world of cities: the comparative gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Robinson, J. (2011b). The spaces of circulating knowledge: city strategies and global urban governmentality. In E. McCann & K. Ward (Eds.), Mobile urbanism: cities and policymaking in the global age (pp. 15–40). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rose, R. (2005). Learning from comparative public policy: a practical guide. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Roy, A., & Ong, A. (Eds.). (2011). Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Saunier, P.-Y. (2002). Taking up the bet on connections: a municipal contribution. Contemporary European History, 2(4), 507–527.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Schalekamp, H., & Behrens, R. (2008). Towards a user-oriented approach in the design and planning of public transport interchanges. Presented at the Southern Africa Transport Conference, Tshwane, South Africa.

  56. Schalekamp, H., & Behrens, R. (2013). Engaging the paratransit sector in Cape Town on public transport reform: progress, process and risks. Research in Transportation Economics, 39, 185–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Schalekamp, H., Behrens, R., & Wilkinson, P. (2010). Regulating minibus taxis: a critical review of progress and a possible way forward. Presented at the Southern Africa Transport Conference, Tshwane, South Africa.

  58. Shatkin, G. (2011). Planning privatopolis: representation and contestation in the development of urban integrated mega-projects. In A. Roy & A. Ong (Eds.), World cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global (pp. 77–97). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  59. Shiller, R. J. (1995). Rhetoric and economic behavior: conversation, information, and herd behavior. The American Economic Review, 85(2), 181–185.

    Google Scholar 

  60. South African Parliament. Municipal Systems Act, Act No. 32, 2000 (2000).

  61. Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the “transnationalization” of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 545–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Temenos, C., & McCann, E. (2012). The local politics of policy mobility: learning, persuasion, and the production of a municipal sustainability fix. Environment & Planning A, 44(6), 1389–1406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Turok, I. (2014). The resilience of South African cities a decade after local democracy. Environment & Planning A, 46(4), 749–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Turok, I., & Watson, V. (2001). Divergent development in South African cities: strategic challenges facing Cape Town. Urban Forum, 12(1), 119–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Van Ryneveld, P. (2006). Towards a discussion on refining the system of decentralization and the division of powers and functions between the three spheres of government (pp. 1–39). South Africa: Department of Provincial and Local Government.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Vion, A. (2002). Europe from the bottom up: town twinning in France during the cold war. Contemporary European History, 11(4), 623–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American States. The American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Ward, K. (2006). “Policies in motion”, urban management and state restructuring: the trans-local expansion of business improvement districts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(1), 54–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Ward, K. (2010). Towards a relational comparative approach to the study of cities. Progress in Human Geography, 8(34), 471–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Willumsen, L. (Pilo), & Lillo, E. (2005). Bus rapid transit and urban development. Presented at the Southern Africa Transport Conference, Tshwane, South Africa.

  71. Wolman, H. (1992). Understanding cross national policy transfers: the case of Britain and the US. Governance, 5, 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Wolman, H., & Page, E. (2002). Policy transfer among local governments: an information-theory approach. Governance: An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 15(4), 477–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Wood, A. (2014a). Learning through policy tourism: circulating bus rapid transit from South America to South Africa. Environment & Planning A, 46(11), 2654–2669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Wood, A. (2014b). Moving policy: global and local characters circulating bus rapid transit through South African cities. Urban Geography, 35(8), 1238-1254.

  75. Wood, A. (2014c). The politics of policy circulation: unpacking the relationship between South African and South American cities in the adoption of bus rapid transit. Antipode, 1–18. doi:10.1111/anti.12135.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Astrid Wood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wood, A. Competing for Knowledge: Leaders and Laggards of Bus Rapid Transit in South Africa. Urban Forum 26, 203–221 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-014-9248-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bus rapid transit
  • Inter-urban competition
  • Policy mobilities
  • South African urbanism