Urban Forum

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 203–221 | Cite as

Competing for Knowledge: Leaders and Laggards of Bus Rapid Transit in South Africa

Article

Abstract

Building on the substantial body of literature on policy mobilities, this paper attends to the circulation of bus rapid transit (BRT) as it swept through South African cities to reconsider the power of the interactions between municipalities and their policy actors in the determination to adopt circulated forms of knowledge. Such debates deepen and widen the space through which policy flows by proposing that local competitive interactions and relationships shape the circulation process. The paper utilizes evidence of municipal diplomacy, which includes partisan contestation between rival parties, limited financial resources and insufficient technical expertise, to suggest that both governmental and personal alignments were the driving force for BRT adoption. It then goes on to provide evidence of the neglected opportunities to exchange knowledge across South African localities, outcomes indicative of wider political manoeuvrings. Unravelling the engagements across South African cities adds a critical dimension to understandings of urban policy mobilities by explaining why, and with what consequences, learning brings certain cities into conversation with one another while pushing others further apart. Under such instances, cities are not merely importers or exporters of policy but part of the wider system of power relations in which policy circulates. This application of policy circulation makes an important contribution to studies of the post-apartheid city by providing an alternative theorization of South African inter-urban hierarchies and relationality.

Keywords

Bus rapid transit Inter-urban competition Policy mobilities South African urbanism 

References

  1. Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: conformity, fads, and information cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boraine, A., Crankshaw, O., Engelbrecht, C., Gotz, G., Mbanga, S., Narsoo, M., & Parnell, S. (2006). The State of South African cities a decade after democracy. Urban Studies, 43(2), 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke, N. (2010). Town twinning in cold-war Britain: (dis)continuities in twentieth-century municipal internationalism. Contemporary British History, 24(2), 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke, N. (2011). Globalizing care? Town twinning in Britain since 1945. Geoforum, 42, 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cook, I. R. (2010). Policing, partnerships and profits: the operations of business improvement districts and town center management schemes in England. Urban Geography, 31(4), 453–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Department of Transport. (1996). White paper on national transport policy. Pretoria: Department of Transport.Google Scholar
  9. Department of Transport. (1999). Moving South Africa: a transport strategy for 2020. Pretoria: Department of Transport.Google Scholar
  10. Department of Transport. (2000). National Land Transport Transition Act. Pretoria: Department of Transport.Google Scholar
  11. Department of Transport. (2009). National Land Transport Act. Pretoria: Department of Transport.Google Scholar
  12. Didier, S., Peyroux, E., & Morange, M. (2012). The spreading of the city improvement district model in Johannesburg and Cape Town: urban regeneration and the neoliberal agenda in South Africa. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(5), 915–935. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01136.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: a review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44, 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dye, T. R. (1990). American federalism: competition among governments. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  16. Ewen, S., & Hebbert, M. (2007). European cities in a networked world during the long 20th century. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25, 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaspari, O. (2002). Cities against states? Hopes, dreams and shortcomings of the European municipal movement, 1900–1960. Contemporary European History, 11, 597–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilbert, A. (2002). “Scan globally; reinvent locally”: reflecting on the origins of South Africa’s capital housing subsidy policy. Urban Studies, 10, 1911–1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. González, S. (2011). Bilbao and Barcelona “in motion”: how urban regeneration “models” travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism. Urban Studies, 48(7), 1397–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guggenheim, M., & Söderström, O. (Eds.). (2010). Re-shaping cities: how global mobility transforms architecture and urban form. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hagerstrand, T. (1967). Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hitge, G., & Gqaji, A. (2011). Impact of a transport system and urban form on the population of a city. Presented at the Southern Africa Transport Conference, Tshwane, South Africa.Google Scholar
  23. Holtzhausen, L. J., & Abrahamson, A. D. (2011). Municipal public transport in Cape Town: institutional arrangements. Presented at the Southern Africa Transport Conference, Tshwane, South Africa.Google Scholar
  24. Huat, C. B. (2011). Singapore as model: planning innovations, knowledge experts. In A. Roy & A. Ong (Eds.), World cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global (pp. 29–54). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Jacobs, J. M. (2012). Urban geographies I: still thinking cities relationally. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3), 412–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. John, L. (2012). Secondary cities in South Africa: the start of a conversation. Johannesburg: South African Cities Network.Google Scholar
  27. Maunganidze, L., & Del Mistro, R. (2012). The role of bus rapid transit in improving public transport levels of service, particularly for the urban poor users of public transport: a case of Cape Town, South Africa. Presented at the Southern Africa Transport Conference, Tshwane, South Africa.Google Scholar
  28. Mbembe, A. (2004). Aesthetics of superfluidity. Public Culture, 16, 373–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McCann, E. (2004). “Best places”: interurban competition, quality of life and population media discourse. Urban Studies, 41, 1909–1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCann, E. (2008). Expertise, truth, and urban policy mobilities: global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada’s “four pillar” drug strategy. Environment & Planning A, 40, 885–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCann, E. (2011a). Points of reference: knowledge of elsewhere in the politics of urban drug policy. In E. McCann & K. Ward (Eds.), Mobile urbanism: cities and policymaking in the global age (pp. 97–122). Minneapolis: Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  32. McCann, E. (2011b). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCann, E. (2013). Policy boosterism, policy mobilities, and the extrospective city. Urban Geography, 34(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2010). Relationality/territoriality: towards a conceptualization of cities in the world. Geoforum, 41(2), 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCann, E., & Ward, K. (Eds.). (2011). Mobile urbanism: cities and policymaking in the global age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  36. McFarlane, C. (2010). The comparative city: knowledge, learning, urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 725–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. National Planning Commission. (2011). Diagnosis overview. Pretoria: National Planning Commission in the Presidency.Google Scholar
  38. Nevhutanda, A. (2007). Impact of rapid urbanisation of South African cities on their transport policies: a theoretical perspective. Presented at the Southern Africa Transport Conference, Tshwane, South Africa.Google Scholar
  39. Parnell, S., Pieterse, E., Swilling, M., & Wooldridge, D. (Eds.). (2002). Democratising local government: the South African experiment. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.Google Scholar
  40. Peck, J. (2011a). Creative moments: working culture, through municipal socialism and neoliberal urbanism. In E. McCann & K. Ward (Eds.), Mobile urbanism: cities and policymaking in the global age (pp. 41–70). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  41. Peck, J. (2011b). Geographies of policy: from transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 1–25.Google Scholar
  42. Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2001). Exporting workfare/importing welfare-to-work: exploring the politics of third way policy transfer. Political Geography, 20, 427–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010a). Mobilizing policy: models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41(2), 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010b). Recombinant workfare, across the Americas: transnationalizing “fast” social policy. Geoforum, 41(2), 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peyroux, E., Pütz, R., & Glasze, G. (2012). Business improvement districts (BIDs): the internationalization and contextualization of a “travelling concept”. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(2), 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pirie, G. (2010). Trajectories of north–south city inter-relations: Johannesburg and Cape Town, 1994–2007. Urban Studies, 47(9), 1985–2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robertson, D. B. (1991). Political conflict and lesson-drawing. Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Robinson, J. (1997). The geopolitics of South African cities: states, citizens, territory. Political Geography, 16(5), 365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robinson, J. (2011a). Cities in a world of cities: the comparative gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robinson, J. (2011b). The spaces of circulating knowledge: city strategies and global urban governmentality. In E. McCann & K. Ward (Eds.), Mobile urbanism: cities and policymaking in the global age (pp. 15–40). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  51. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  52. Rose, R. (2005). Learning from comparative public policy: a practical guide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Roy, A., & Ong, A. (Eds.). (2011). Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  54. Saunier, P.-Y. (2002). Taking up the bet on connections: a municipal contribution. Contemporary European History, 2(4), 507–527.Google Scholar
  55. Schalekamp, H., & Behrens, R. (2008). Towards a user-oriented approach in the design and planning of public transport interchanges. Presented at the Southern Africa Transport Conference, Tshwane, South Africa.Google Scholar
  56. Schalekamp, H., & Behrens, R. (2013). Engaging the paratransit sector in Cape Town on public transport reform: progress, process and risks. Research in Transportation Economics, 39, 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schalekamp, H., Behrens, R., & Wilkinson, P. (2010). Regulating minibus taxis: a critical review of progress and a possible way forward. Presented at the Southern Africa Transport Conference, Tshwane, South Africa.Google Scholar
  58. Shatkin, G. (2011). Planning privatopolis: representation and contestation in the development of urban integrated mega-projects. In A. Roy & A. Ong (Eds.), World cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global (pp. 77–97). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shiller, R. J. (1995). Rhetoric and economic behavior: conversation, information, and herd behavior. The American Economic Review, 85(2), 181–185.Google Scholar
  60. South African Parliament. Municipal Systems Act, Act No. 32, 2000 (2000).Google Scholar
  61. Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the “transnationalization” of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 545–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Temenos, C., & McCann, E. (2012). The local politics of policy mobility: learning, persuasion, and the production of a municipal sustainability fix. Environment & Planning A, 44(6), 1389–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Turok, I. (2014). The resilience of South African cities a decade after local democracy. Environment & Planning A, 46(4), 749–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Turok, I., & Watson, V. (2001). Divergent development in South African cities: strategic challenges facing Cape Town. Urban Forum, 12(1), 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Van Ryneveld, P. (2006). Towards a discussion on refining the system of decentralization and the division of powers and functions between the three spheres of government (pp. 1–39). South Africa: Department of Provincial and Local Government.Google Scholar
  66. Vion, A. (2002). Europe from the bottom up: town twinning in France during the cold war. Contemporary European History, 11(4), 623–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American States. The American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ward, K. (2006). “Policies in motion”, urban management and state restructuring: the trans-local expansion of business improvement districts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(1), 54–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ward, K. (2010). Towards a relational comparative approach to the study of cities. Progress in Human Geography, 8(34), 471–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Willumsen, L. (Pilo), & Lillo, E. (2005). Bus rapid transit and urban development. Presented at the Southern Africa Transport Conference, Tshwane, South Africa.Google Scholar
  71. Wolman, H. (1992). Understanding cross national policy transfers: the case of Britain and the US. Governance, 5, 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wolman, H., & Page, E. (2002). Policy transfer among local governments: an information-theory approach. Governance: An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 15(4), 477–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wood, A. (2014a). Learning through policy tourism: circulating bus rapid transit from South America to South Africa. Environment & Planning A, 46(11), 2654–2669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wood, A. (2014b). Moving policy: global and local characters circulating bus rapid transit through South African cities. Urban Geography, 35(8), 1238-1254.Google Scholar
  75. Wood, A. (2014c). The politics of policy circulation: unpacking the relationship between South African and South American cities in the adoption of bus rapid transit. Antipode, 1–18. doi:10.1111/anti.12135.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations