Towards Achieving Resilience at the Rural–Urban Fringe: the Case of Jamestown, South Africa


The “rural–urban fringe” is under assault worldwide, as cities expand in seemingly unstoppable growth, commonly known as “urban sprawl.” As cities grow, this “transition zone” becomes a contested area as various actors fight for space, with varying opinions on land use. This paper describes the decision-making dynamics governing land use in Jamestown, located in the rural–urban fringe, in Stellenbosch Municipality, South Africa. A fundamental lesson that emerged out of the research is that local outcomes are highly vulnerable to economic and political realities that may exist far from the area itself, resulting in clear winners, and “losers,” often depending on the ideological perspective of the individuals involved. The paper aims to draw out several lessons for planners and advocates of sustainable urban design: given the complex pressures governing land use in present day South Africa, what is there to be learned from this particular case in terms of “best practice” and best/better ways forward?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  1. 1.

    Wehrwein wrote about the problem with urbanization in the RUF in 1942. In this paper, he also mentioned that expansion of the RUF has been an issue since the late 1800s–early 1900s.

  2. 2.

    According to Bryant (1982), the continuum varies from place to place since the pressures that influence RUF changes vary. Its order changes and it may appear in various directions around the same city.

  3. 3.

    The district has a population of 712,411 and grew on average by 2.1 %.

  4. 4.

    There were 117,704 people living in Stellenbosch Municipality in 2001. This number grew to 200,521 people in 2007.

  5. 5.

    They are currently pursuing strategies to develop the public land as a low-income housing settlement.

  6. 6.

    Social housing projects are typically built alongside areas that were known as townships or group areas during apartheid. They are typically located in RUF areas: outside of main urban centers).

  7. 7.

    An 8-m2 flat rents for R1,500/month.

  8. 8.

    During interviews, study participants explained that mentioning the race of the members of the party was important for understanding why and what transpired.

  9. 9.

    The Regional Services Council no longer exists, but it has been somewhat converted into Stellenbosch District Municipality.

  10. 10.

    Meaning post-1991

  11. 11.

    I wish to thank the anonymous reviewer who provided this insight into the Spier development.


  1. Armitage, D., Berkes, F., & Doubleday, N. (Eds.). (2007). Collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance: adaptive co-management. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belsky, E. (2012). Planning for inclusive and sustainable urban growth. In W. Institute (Ed.), State of the world moving toward sustainable prosperity (pp. 38–52). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1692–1702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berkes, F., Armitage, D., & Doubleday, N. (2002). Synthesis: adapting, innovating, evolving. In D. Armitage, F. Berkes, & N. Doubleday (Eds.), Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning and multi-level governance (pp. 208–227). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blais, P. (2010). Perverse cities. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bryant, C. R. (1995). The role of local actors in transforming the urban fringe. Journal of Rural Studies, 11(3), 225–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bryant, C. (1982). The rural real estate market. Waterloo: University of Waterloo. Department of Geography Publication Series.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carruthers, J. I. (2003). Growth at the fringe: the influence of political fragmentation in United States metropolitan areas. Papers in Regional Science, 82, 475–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cash, C., & Swatuk, L. (2010). Integrated development planning in South Africa: lessons from the Dwars River Valley. Urban Forum, 22(1), 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark, A.L. (2009). Environmental challenges to urban planning: fringe areas, ecological footprints and climate change. In Proceedings from the Governance, Socio-economic, and Environmental Issues Workshop. Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

  11. Dewar, D. (2000). The relevance of the compact city approach. In M. Jenks & R. Burgess (Eds.), Compact cities: sustainable urban forms for developing countries. London: Spon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Flyvbjerg, B. (2003). Rationality and power. In S. Campbell & S. S. Fainstein (Eds.), Readings in planning theory (2nd ed., pp. 318–329). Westford: Blackwell. Original work published 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Government of South Africa. (2011). State of the environment report. Accessed 27 Apr 2011.

  15. Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (Eds.). (2002). Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and ecological systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S., & Light, S. S. (1998). Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Municipality of Stellenbosch (2012). Municipal spatial development framework.

  18. Municipality of Stellenbosch (2010). Draft municipal spatial development framework

  19. OECD. (2011). OECD rural policy reviews: England, UK. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Olsson, P., Gunderson, L. H., Carpenter, S. R., et al. (2006). Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1).

  21. Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Hahn, T. (2004). Adaptive co-management for building social-ecological knowledge. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Peterson, G. (2007). Using scenario planning to enable an adaptive co-management process in the Northern Highlands Lake District of Wisconsin. In D. Armitage, F. Berkes, & N. Doubleday (Eds.), Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning and multi-level governance (pp. 208–227). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pinkerton, E. (2003). Towards specificity in complexity: understanding co-management from a social science perspective. In D. C. Wilson, J. R. Nielson, & P. Degnbol (Eds.), The fisheries co-management experience (pp. 61–71). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Plummer, R., & FitzGibbon, J. (2004). Some observations on the terminology in co-operative environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 70, 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Qviström, M. (2007). Landscapes out of order: studying the inner urban fringe beyond the rural–urban divide. Geografiska Annaler, 89B(3), 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Scott, A. J., et al. (2013). Disintegrated development at the rural urban fringe: re-connecting spatial planning theory and practice. Progress in Planning, 83, 152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Scott, A. J., & Carter, C. (2011) The rural urban fringe: Forgotten opportunity space? Town and Country Planning May/June, 231–234.

  28. Sullivan, W. C., Anderson, O. M., & Lovell, S. T. (2004). Agricultural buffers at the rural–urban fringe: an examination of approval by farmers, residents, and academics in the Midwestern United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World urbanization prospects, the 2011 revisions. (2011). Accessed 4 Apr 2013.

  30. United Nations Environment Programme. (2013). Urban issues. Accessed 4 Apr 2013.

  31. UNFPA. (2011). State of the world population. People and possibilities in a world of 7 billion.

  32. UN Habitat. (2013). State of the world's cities 2012–2013. Prosperity of cities. Accessed 4 Apr 2013.

  33. UN Habitat. (2010). State of the world's cities 2010/2011: bridging the urban divide. Accessed 4 Apr 2013.

  34. Watkins, M., Hilts, S. & Brockie. M. (2003). Protecting Southern Ontario's farmland: challenges and opportunities. A centre for land and water stewardship publication, University of Guelph, Ontario.

  35. Wehrwein, G. S. (1942). The rural-urban fringe. Economic Geography, 18(3), 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. World Health Organization. (2013). Urban population growth. Accessed 4 Apr 2013.

Download references


The author wishes to thank the participants in this research and hope that the findings prove useful in moving forward. She also acknowledges the useful comments and criticisms from the editors and anonymous reviewers of the journal. This research has been made possible by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corrine Cash.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cash, C. Towards Achieving Resilience at the Rural–Urban Fringe: the Case of Jamestown, South Africa. Urban Forum 25, 125–141 (2014).

Download citation


  • Rural–urban fringe
  • Governance
  • Planning
  • Management
  • South Africa