Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing Low-Income Housing Outcomes in Self-Help and Contractor-Driven Projects: the Case for Longitudinal Research

  • Published:
Urban Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The South African housing research environment is commonly known for its application of the case study approach as a preferred research method. Even the evaluation and assessment of low-income housing developments, to a large degree, are being done through several case studies. However, longer-term assessment or longitudinal studies are virtually absent from this fairly large body of research on low-income housing in South Africa. Although this paper does not deviate from the case study approach, the difference lies in its intent to demonstrate through the housing outcomes of two low-income housing projects (laissez-faire self-help and aided self-help which used a contractor-driven approach) the value and significance of long-term evaluation or longitudinal studies in housing research. Essentially, the paper argues that the limitations associated with one-off case studies and to a large extent, the general absence of longitudinal studies in housing research, lies in the domination of political and economic frameworks. Therefore, the paper showcases the limitations with regard to the interpretation and methods in one-off case studies as opposed to our findings based on longitudinal surveys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Housing Code contains the operational guidelines of the South African housing policy.

References

  • Abbott, J. (2002). An analysis of informal settlement upgrading and critique of existing methodological approaches. Habitat International, 26, 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, T. (2003). Housing policy and poverty in South Africa. In F. Khan & P. Thring (Eds.), Housing policy and practice in post-apartheid South Africa. Johannesburg: Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, P., & Tait, A. (1997). The failure of housing policy in post-apartheid South Africa. Urban Forum, 8(1), 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botes, L. J. S., Krige, S., & Wessels, J. (1991). Informal settlements in Bloemfontein: a case study of migration patterns, socio-economic profile, living conditions and future housing expectations. Bloemfontein: Urban Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R. (1977). Self-help housing: a new imperialist strategy? A critique of the Turner’s school. Antipode, 9(2), 50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Housing. (2000). National housing code. Pretoria: National Department of Housing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauteng News. (2001). Housing programmes benefit the poor and the homeless. 15 February, p. 5. Johannesburg.

  • Harris, R. (2003). A double irony: the originality and influence of John F.C. Turner. Habitat International, 27(2), 245–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huchzermeyer, M. (2001). Housing for the poor? Negotiated housing policy in South Africa. Habitat International, 25(3), 303–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huchzermeyer, M. (2002). Upgrading through the project-linked capital subsidy: implications for the strategies of informal settlement residents and their community organizations. Urban Forum, 13(2), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huchzermeyer, M. (2003). A legacy of control? The capital subsidy for housing and informal settlement intervention in South Africa. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(3), 591–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. A., & Datta, K. (2000). Enabling markets to work? Housing policy in the new South Africa. International Planning Studies, 5(3), 393–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. A., & Ward, P. (1994). The World Bank’s new urban management programme: paradigm shift or policy continuity? Habitat International, 18(3), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, C. (1999). Housing policy in South Africa: the challenge of delivery. Housing Studies, 14(3), 387–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marais, L., & Krige, S. (1997). The upgrading of Freedom Square informal settlement in Bloemfontein: lessons for future low-income housing. Urban Forum, 8(2), 176–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marais, L., & Van der Walt, K. (2010). Downscaling of mining industry in Matjhabeng. Johannesburg: Industrial Development Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marais, L., Van Rensburg, N., Botes, L., et al. (2003). An empirical comparison of self-help housing and contractor-driven housing: evidence from Thabong (Welkom) and Mangaung (Bloemfontein). Urban Forum, 14(4), 347–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcussen, L. (1990). Third world housing in social and spatial development. England: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matovu, G. (2000). Upgrading urban low-income settlements in Africa: constraints, potentials and policy options. Paper presented at regional and roundtable on upgrading low-income settlements. South Africa: Johannesburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier, M. (2003). Supporting the People’s Housing Process. In F. Khan & P. Thring (Eds.), Housing policy and practice in post-apartheid South Africa. Johannesburg: Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier, M. (2005). A macro-perspective on the first decade of South African housing delivery and its contribution towards the formation of sustainable settlements and communities. Paper presented at the DBSA knowledge week seminar. Pretoria: Development Bank of Southern Africa.

  • Ntema, L.J. (2011). Self-help housing in South Africa: paradigms, policy and practice. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein.

  • Payne, G. K. (1984). Low-income housing in the developing world: the role of sites and services and settlement upgrading. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, C. (1992). International finance and housing policies in developing countries. Cities, 9, 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, C. (1996). Methodology, political, economy and economics in land studies for developing countries. Land Use Policy, 13(3), 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, K., & Rubenstein, S. (1996). A mandate to build. Johannesburg: Ravan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sliuzas, R. (2003). Opportunities for enhancing communication in settlement upgrading with geographic information technology-based support tools. Habitat International, 27, 613–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A. (1991). A critical review of the main approaches to self-help housing programmes. London: University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A.F.E. (2001). Architects and housing: challenges within the low-income housing sector in South Africa. Unpublished M.A Thesis, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein.

  • Swilling, M., Humphries, R., & Shubane, K. (Eds.). (1991). Apartheid city in transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, M. R. (2006). From ‘quantity’ to ‘quality’: restructuring South Africa’s housing policy 10 years after. International Development Planning Review, 28(1), 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. F. C. (1976). Housing by people. Towards autonomy in building environments. London: Marion Byers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uji, Z. A. (1998). The squatter house in Nigeria: a triumph of self determination, self-help and decision making. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1(2), 104–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rensburg, N. E. J., Botes, J. S., de Wet, M., et al. (2001). Upgrading and low-income housing initiatives: indicating their value to the people of Freedom Square, Bloemfontein. Development Southern Africa, 18(1), 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venter, A. (2010). Exporting western housing theories and its relevance in the context of a developing country: the case study of South Africa. Paper presented at New Housing. Istanbul: Researchers’ Colloquium Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, P. M. (1982). Self-help housing: a critique. London: Mansell.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1993). Housing, enabling markets to work. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Ntema.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ntema, J., Marais, L. Comparing Low-Income Housing Outcomes in Self-Help and Contractor-Driven Projects: the Case for Longitudinal Research. Urban Forum 24, 389–405 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-012-9183-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-012-9183-8

Keywords

Navigation