Advertisement

Urban Forum

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 233–243 | Cite as

Discourses of Infrastructure and Citizenship in Post-Apartheid Soweto

  • Alex Wafer
Article

Abstract

In this article, I locate Soweto at the epicentre of the changing relationship between state infrastructural capacity on the one hand, and imaginations of citizenship on the other. Far from the ‘hidden’ or merely technical functioning of urban governance, infrastructure has always been central to the urban politics and everyday life of townships in South Africa. The infrastructural capacity of the apartheid state entrenched the segregated apartheid urban system, and was simultaneously the target of political protest in the 1980s. Infrastructure plays a significant role in political expectations in post-apartheid South Africa. Through policies such as the Reconstruction and Development Program and Developmental Local Government, the post-apartheid state has attempted to re-frame citizenship of South Africans, especially in townships, through the provision of housing and basic services. The emergence, therefore, of service delivery protests in townships and informal settlements in the early 2000s marked the possible limits of a post-apartheid citizenship. Based on field research conducted in Soweto in the mid 2000s, and a number of follow-up interviews in 2010 and 2011, I trace the shifting relationship between infrastructure and citizenship as it emerges in the everyday life of contemporary Soweto. I show how electricity disconnections by the municipality and state electricity utility Eskom in the early 2000s—and the subsequent protests they sparked—provided the context for challenging the limits of post-apartheid citizenship. Residents of Soweto were able to link the ‘hidden’ infrastructure of electricity cables and wires to a particular narrative of place. Returning to Soweto in 2010, in the midst of protest action against water prepaid metres in Phiri neighbourhood, issues of access to basic services, housing evictions and unemployment still characterise the everyday life of Soweto. As with protests against electricity disconnections, protests against water prepaid metres have linked urban infrastructure to articulations of citizenship that reside in particular narratives of place. But so too do newer forms of ‘consumer citizenship’, particularly in the form of a new shopping mall that was opened in 2008, and which stands in stark contrast to the politics of basic services.

Keywords

Soweto Township Infrastructure Protest Local government Service delivery 

References

  1. Ballard, R., Habib, A., & Valodia, I. (2006). Voices of protest: social movements in post-apartheid South Africa (pp. 301–324). Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bond, P. (2000). Elite transition: from apartheid to neoliberalism in South Africa. Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press/Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bond, P., & Dugard, J. (2008). The case of Johannesburg water: what really happened at the pre-paid ‘Parish pump. Law, Democracy & Development, 12(1).Google Scholar
  4. Chipkin, I. (1995). A metro or not: politicking on the East Rand. In: Indicator, vol. 12. no.4 Spring. pp. 23–28Google Scholar
  5. Chipkin, I. (2003). ‘Functional’ and ‘Dysfunctional’ communities: the making of national citizens. Journal of Southern African Studies, 29(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chipkin, I. (2007). Do South Africans exist?: nationalism, democracy and the identity of the people. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, A., & Drimie, S. (2002). Energy sustainability for South Africa’s poor. South Africa: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
  8. Desai, A. (2002). We are the poors: community struggles in post-apartheid South Africa. Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fiil-Flynn, M. (2001). The electricity crisis in Soweto. Municipal Services Project Occasional Papers Series No. 4.Google Scholar
  10. Gandy, M. (2006). Planning, anti-planning and the infrastructure crisis facing metropolitan Lagos. Urban Studies, 43, 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gelb, S. (1987). Making sense of the crisis, Transformation, no. 5.Google Scholar
  12. Govender, P., & Aiello, J. (1999). Johannesburg’s strategic plan for municipal service partnerships. Development Southern Africa, 16(4), 649–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kooy, M., & Bakker, K. (2008). Technologies of government: constituting subjectivities, spaces, and infrastructures in colonial and contemporary Jakarta. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(2), 375–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mann, M. (1984). The autonomous power of the state: its origins, mechanisms and results, Archieves Europeennes de Sociologie, vol. 25.Google Scholar
  16. Mann, M. (2008). Infrastructural power revisited. Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID), 43(3), 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mayekiso, M. (2003). South Africa’s enduring urban crisis: the local state and the urban social movement with particular reference to Johannesburg. In P. Harrison, M. Huchzermeyer, & M. Mayekiso (Eds.), Confronting fragmentation: housing and urban development in a democratising society. (pp. 57).Google Scholar
  18. McFarlane, C. (2008). Governing the contaminated city: infrastructure and sanitation in colonial and post-colonial Bombay. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32, 415–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ngwane, T. (2003). Sparks in the township: interview with Trevor Ngwane, New Left Review 22, July/August, pp. 37–56.Google Scholar
  20. Parliament of the Republic of South Africa (1994). Notice no. 1954 of 1994, white paper on reconstruction and development, Cape Town, 15 November.Google Scholar
  21. Parliament of the Republic of South Africa (1998). The white paper on local government, Cape Town, 9 March.Google Scholar
  22. Parnell, S. & Pieterse, E. (1998). Developmental local government: the second wave of post-apartheid urban reconstruction. Dark Roast Occasional Paper Series, 1.Google Scholar
  23. Parnell, S., & Pieterse, E. (2010). The ‘Right to the City’: institutional imperatives of a developmental state. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(1), 146–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pieterse, E. (2009). Post-apartheid geographies in South Africa: why are urban divides so persistent. In: Interdisciplinary debates on development and culture: cities in development. Leuven University.Google Scholar
  25. Radebe, J. (2001). ‘Speech of Jeff Radebe, Minister of Public Enterprises, at the Workshop on Service Delivery Framework held at Megawatt Park Conference Room’, 30 November, http://www.polity.org.za/html/govdocs/speeches/2001/sp1130.html.
  26. Reddy, P. S. (2003). Metropolitan unicity development in South Africa: a case study of Greater Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, D. M. (1992). The apartheid city and beyond: urbanization and social change in South Africa. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  28. Soifer, H., & vom Hau, M. (2008). Unpacking the strength of the state: the utility of state infrastructural power. Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID), 43(3), 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Swilling, M. (2006). Sustainability and infrastructure planning in South Africa: a Cape Town case study. Environment and Urbanization, 18(23), 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Swilling, M., et al. (2004). Economic policy making in a developmental state: review of the South African Government’s Poverty and Development Approaches 1994–2004. South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
  31. Todes, A. (2006). Urban spatial policy. Pillay, U., Tomlinson, R., & duToit, J. (eds.) In: Democracy and delivery: urban policy in South Africa. Cape Town: HSRC Press. pp. 50–75Google Scholar
  32. Tomlinson, R. (1999). Ten years in the making. Urban Forum, 10, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. von Schnitzler, A. (2008). Citizenship prepaid: water, calculability, and techno-Politics in South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 34(4), 899–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.African Centre for Migration and SocietyWits UniversityJohannesburgSouth Africa
  2. 2.Max Planck Institute for the study of Religious and Ethnic DiversityGoettingenGermany

Personalised recommendations