Skip to main content
Log in

A Response to Responsibility of and Trust in ISPs by Raphael Cohen-Almagor

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Knowledge, Technology & Policy

Abstract

The Internet and Internet applications such as cloud computing continue to grow at an extraordinary rate, enabled by the Internet's open architecture and the vibrant lightly regulated Internet service provider (ISP) market. Proposals to hold ISPs responsible for content and software shared by their customers would dramatically constrain the openness and innovation that has been the hallmark of the Internet to date. Rather than taking the kind of approach favored by Raphael Cohen-Almagor, government should enlist the assistance of other intermediaries such as credit card companies in targeted actions against illegal activities online. In addition, they should foster improved online authentication, which could support “zones of trust” on the Internet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Let IT rise, a survey of corporate computing. The economist, October 23, 2008, http://www.economist.com/node/12411882?story_id=12411882

  2. See the Internet Society’s public policy principles, http://www.isoc.org/pubpolpillar/principles.shtml

References

  • Blumenthal, M. S., & Clark, D. D. (2001). Rethinking the design of the Internet: the end to end arguments vs. the brave new world. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 1(1), 70–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, B. (1996). The architectural principles of the internet, RFC 1958. Internet Engineering Task Force. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1958.txt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. D. (1988). The design philosophy of the DARPA Internet Protocols. Proc SIGCOMM 88, ACM CCR, 18(4), 106–114 (reprinted in ACM CCR Vol 25, Number 1, January 1995, pages 102–111).

  • MacCarthy, M. (2009). What internet intermediaries are doing about liability and why it matters. ExpressO. Available at: http://works.bepress.com/mark_maccarthy/1.

  • Saltzer, J., Reed, D., et al. (1984). End-to-end arguments in system design. Second international conference on distributed computing systems. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 2(4), 277–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zittrain, J. (2008). The future of the internet and how to stop it. New Haven: Yale University Press. http://futureoftheinternet.org/download.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Nelson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, M.R. A Response to Responsibility of and Trust in ISPs by Raphael Cohen-Almagor. Know Techn Pol 23, 403–407 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-010-9121-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-010-9121-9

Keywords

Navigation