Skip to main content

Exploring User-Centred Design in Practice: Some Caveats

Abstract

This paper provides a nuanced perspective on the topic of user-centred design (UCD) in the human–computer interaction (HCI) field. After a brief outline of its emergence, we describe some of the central tenets of the approach, using the process model of Gulliksen et al. (Behav Inf Technol 22(6):397–409, 2003) as a well-documented exemplar. We then examine in more detail some of the difficulties one can encounter in performing user-centred design (UCD), illuminating these issues through vignettes from specific projects in which we have been involved. In this paper, we focus on issues that can arise in working with children and with people of differing mental abilities. Our argument is that, while a user-centred perspective is required at all times in the design team, the forms of participation of users in the design process needs to fit the context and can vary significantly from that presented as the prototypical UCD approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. In later years, the term “Cooperative Design” has come into use (Greenbaum & Kyng, 1991) which, while preserving an interest in methods of user involvement, reduces somewhat the overly political agenda evident in the earlier collective resource model.

  2. Indeed, advocacy of designer-led activities for part of the design cycle, intertwined with joint user–designer experimentation, is persuasively argued in the paper by Agostini et al. (2000) on “user seduction”.

  3. While there are subtle distinctions between the usage of the terms “user involvement” and “user participation”, with the latter often connoting a more active engagement in the process, we will use the terms synonymously in this paper.

References

  • Agostini, A., De Michelis, G. and Susani, M. (2000) “From User Participation to User Seduction in the Design of Innovative User-Centered Systems. In R. Dieng, et al. (Eds.), Designing Cooperative Systems: The Use of Theories and Models. Proc. of the 5th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP’2000, Sophia Antipolis, France, May 2000), IOS Press, pp. 225–240.

  • Bjerknes, G., P. Ehn, & M. Kyng (Eds.) (1987), Computers and democracy—a Scandinavian challenge, Aldershot, UK: Avebury.

  • Boehm, B. (1988) The spiral model of software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer, 21(5): 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantine, L. L. and Lockwood, L. A. D. (2002), User-Centered Engineering for Web Applications. IEEE Software, 19(2), 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. (1999) The inmates are running the asylum: Why high-tech products drives us crazy and how to restore the sanity (Indianapolis, Indiana: SAMS).

  • Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Rodden, T., Cheverst, K., Clarke, K., Dewsbury, G., Hughes, J. A. and Rouncefield, M. (2003) Designing with care: Adapting cultural probes to inform design in sensitive settings. Proc. OZCHI 2003, University of Queensland, 4–13.

  • Domus Academy (1999). Concept design. POGO deliverable no. 99007/v.1.

  • Druin, A. (Ed.) (1998). The Design of Children’s Technology: How we design and why? San Francisco (CA): Morgan Kaufmann.

  • Ehn, P., and Kyng, M. (1987). The Collective Resource Approach to Systems Design. In G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, & M. Kyng (Eds.), Computers and democracy—a Scandinavian challenge, (pp. 17–58). Aldershot, UK: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdmann, R.L. and Neal, A.S. (1971) Laboratory vs. field experimentation in human factors. An evaluation of an experimental self-service airline ticket vendor. Human Factors, 13, 521–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM, 28, 3, 300–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J. D., Boies, S. J. and Ukelson, J. (1997), How to Design Usable Systems. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer and P. Prabhu (eds) Handbook of Human–Computer Interaction (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. (1991), Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, Jonathan (1991): Obstacles to User Involvement in Software Product Development, with Implications for CSCW. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34 (3), 435–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulliksen, J. Goransson, B., Boivie, I., Blomkvist, S. Persson, J, Cajander, Å., (2003), Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22 (6), 397–409.

  • ISO 13407. 1999, Human-centered design processes for interactive system (Geneve: International Organization for Standardization).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapor, M. (1990) A Software Design Manifesto (reprinted in Terry Winograd (ed.) Bringing Design To Software, Addison-Wesley, 1996), 1–9.

  • Kyng, M. (1995) Making Representations Work. Communications of the ACM, 38(9), 46–55.

  • Marti, P., Lund, H.H., Bacigalupo, M. Giusti, L., Mennecozzi, C. (2007), Blending Senses: A Multi-sensory Environment for the treatment of Dementia Affected Subjects, Journal of Gerontechnology, 6(1), 33–41 ISSN 1569–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti, P. Giusti, L. (2008), Crafting Sensorial Stimulation and Social Exchange in Dementia Care. The 6th International Conference of the Gerontechnology, June 4–7, 2008—Pisa, Italy.

  • Marti, P. Giusti, L. (2007), Coupling the digital and the physical: a way on in the design of tangible media, In Human–Computer Interaction. Interaction Platforms and Techniques. Volume 4551/2007 12th International Conference, HCI International 2007, Beijing, China, July 22–27, 2007, Proceedings, Part II. ISSN0302-9743 (Print) 1611-3349 (Online), pp 1173–1182. Berlin: Springer/Heidelberg.

  • Nielsen, J. 1993, Usability Engineering, Cambridge, MA: AP Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A., Draper, S. W. (eds) (1986). User Centred Systems Design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

  • Ripich, D.N., Vertes, D., Whitehouse, P., Fulton, S., Ekelman, B. (1991) Turn-taking and speech act patterns in the discourse of senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type patients. Brain Lang, 40(3):330–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, A. Marti, P. Decortis, F., Moderini, C., Rutgers, J. (2003), The design of POGO world, In Hollnagen E. (ed.) Handbook of Cognitive Task Design, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 577–602.

  • Scaife, M. Rogers, Y. Aldrich, F. Davies, M. (1997) Designing For or Designing With? Informant Design For Interactive Learning Environments. Proceedings of CHI 97, 22–27 March 1997, Atlanta, USA, 343–350.

  • Webb, B.R, (1996) The role of users in interactive systems design: when computers are theatre, do we want the audience to write the script? Behaviour and Information Technology, 15, 2, 76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. (1994), Rethinking requirements analysis: some implications of recent research into producer-consumer relationships in IT development, in M. Jirotka and J. Goguen (eds), Requirements Engineering: Social and Technical Issues. London: Academic, 201–216.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrizia Marti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marti, P., Bannon, L.J. Exploring User-Centred Design in Practice: Some Caveats. Know Techn Pol 22, 7–15 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-009-9062-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-009-9062-3

Keywords

  • UCD
  • Users forms of participation
  • Children
  • Impaired people