Advertisement

Knowledge, Technology & Policy

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 193–200 | Cite as

Why Research-Oriented Design Isn’t Design-Oriented Research: On the Tensions Between Design and Research in an Implicit Design Discipline

  • Daniel Fallman
Original Paper

Abstract

Human–computer interaction (HCI) is the discipline concerned with the design, evaluation, and implementation of interactive computing systems. Unlike many empirical sciences, HCI researchers do not typically solely study existing technologies, styles of interaction, or interface solutions. On the contrary, one of the core activities in contemporary HCI is to design new technologies – in the form of software and hardware prototypes – that act as vehicles through which HCI researchers’ ideas materialize and take on concrete form. Despite this situation, there is a very modest discussion in the discipline on the role of design as an activity in the research process; whether or not HCI could in fact be better understood as a design discipline than as an empirical science; and if, and if so how, the design element in HCI goes with its empirical claims.

Keywords

Design Human–computer interaction Research-oriented design Design-oriented research Theory 

References

  1. Buxton, B. (2007) Sketching the User Experience, Morgan KaufmannGoogle Scholar
  2. Coyne, R. Designing Information Technology in the Postmodern Age, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. Ehn, P. Work-oriented Design of Computer Artifacts, Arbetslivscentrum, Falköping, Sweden, 1988.Google Scholar
  4. Fallman, D. Design-oriented Human–Computer Interaction, Proc. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 225–232.Google Scholar
  5. Ihde, D. Instrumental Realism, Indiana University Press Bloomington, IN, 1991.Google Scholar
  6. Jones, J. C. Design Methods, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, 1970.Google Scholar
  7. Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1962.Google Scholar
  8. Nelson, H. & Stolterman, E. The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World, Educational Technology Publications, New Jersey, NY, 2003.Google Scholar
  9. Schön, D. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, New York, NY, 1983.Google Scholar
  10. Schön, D. Designing as Reflective Conversation with the Materials of a Design Situation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 5, (1992) 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wolf, T. V., Rode, J. A. , Sussman, J., & Kellogg, W. A.(2006). Dispelling “design” as the black art of CHI. Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2006, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
  12. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Evenson, S. (2007) Research Through Design as a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2007, San Jose, CA, 493–502Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Umeå Institute of Design & Department of InformaticsUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations