Skip to main content

Free software and copyright enforcement: A tool for global copyright policy?

Abstract

One of the paradoxes of the free software ideology is its reliance on the legal institutions it was created to object to. One could argue that Free Software Foundation is using copyright to enforce their free software licenses as aggressively as the Business Software Alliance is enforcing its clients’ copyrights. We will show that the reality is more complex and that there is a significant difference: the free software community uses primarily non-legal enforcement methods and trusts on social norms. We argue that free software could be used as a tool to make copyright more accepted in the less developed world because of its positive connection with copyright and community based approach. We explain why strong copyright is also in the interest of free software developers. The article concludes by suggesting that World Intellectual Property Organization should include free software into its development agenda.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Alford, W. (1997). To Steal a Book Is an Elegant Offense: Intellectual Property Law in Chinese Civilization. Stanford University Press.

  • Batson, A. (2004). “Foreign software shutout”. The Standard 30.11. 〈http://www.thestandard.com.hk/stdn/std/China/FK30Ad01.html〉.

  • Bonaccorsi A. & Rossi C. (2004). “Altruistic individuals, selfish firms? The structure of motivation in Open Source software”. First Monday, Volume 9, Issue 1. 〈http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_1/bonaccorsi〉.

  • Business Software Alliance (2003). “First Annual BSA And IDC Global Software Piracy Study”. 〈http://www.bsa.org/globalstudy〉.

  • Drahos, P. & Braithwaite, J. (2002). Information Feudalism: Who Owns The Knowledge Economy. Earthscan Publications. London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson, R. (1991). Order Without Law—How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, B. (1976). “An Open Letter to Hobbyists”. 〈http://www.blinkenlights.com/classiccmp/gateswhine.html〉.

  • “Geneva Declaration on the Future of the World Intellectual Property Organization”. (2004). 〈http://www.cptech.org/ip/wipo/futureofwipodeclaration.html (Geneva Declaration)〉.

  • “German court decision from Landgericht München I” on 19th May 2004. 〈http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_muenchen_gpl.pdf〉.

  • Ghosh, R. (2003). “Open Source: A case for developing countries”. South Centre Briefing to WIPO delegates, Geneva, November 3, 2003. 〈http://www.infonomics.nl/FLOSS/papers/20031103/20031103_wipo.htm〉.

  • Ghosh, R., Robles, G. & Glott, R. (2002) “Free/libre and open source software: Survey and study FLOSS”. Technical report, International Institute of Infonomics, University of Maastricht: Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Initiative for Software Choice” (2004a). Key Messages. 〈http://www.softwarechoice.org/download_files/Key_ISC_messaging.pdf〉.

  • “Initiative for Software Choice”. (2004b). ISC Comments to Chinese Ministry of Information Regarding Proposed “Domestic Sourcing” Rules for Software Purchases. 〈http://www.softwarechoice.org/download_files/Chinese_Software_Rules_Comments.pdf〉. (ISC, 2004)

  • Lessig, L. (2003). “The extremists in power”. Blog entry Aug 22 03 at 5:58 AM. 〈http://www.lessig.org/blog/archives/001436.shtml〉.

  • Lessig, L. (2001). “Copyright’s First Amendment”. 48 UCLA L. Rev. 1057.

  • The Office of United States Trade Representative. (2004). “The U.S.-China JCCT: Outcomes on Major U.S. Trade Concerns”. 〈http://www.ustr.gov/Document_Library/Fact_Sheets/2004/The_U.S.-China_JCCT_Outcomes_on_Major_U.S._Trade_Concerns.html〉. (ITRE 2004a).

  • The Office of United States Trade Representative (2004). “Letter to Industry from Amb. Josette S. Shiner Regarding 2005 Out-of-Cycle Review on China”. (ITRE 2004b).

  • O’Mahony, S. (2003). “Guarding the Commons: How Community Managed Software Projects Protect Their Work”. Research Policy, Vol. 32, Issue 7, pp. 1179–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perens, B. (2005). “The Open Source Definition Version 1.9”. 〈http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php〉.

  • Progress Software Corp. v. MySQL AB, 195 F. Supp. 2d 328, 329 (D. Mass), 2002 (case settled in November 7, 2002).

  • Proposal by Argentina and Brazil for the Establishment of a Development Agenda for WIPO. (2004). WO/GA/31/11. 〈http://www.wipo.org/documents/en/document/govbody/wo_gb_ga/pdf/wo_ga_31_11.pdf. (Development Agenda)〉.

  • Pugatch, M. (2004). The International Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pun, P. (2004). “Microsoft 29m yuan order lost”. The Standard 30.11. 〈http://www.thestandard.com.hk/thestandard/news_detail_frame.cfm?articleid=52577&intcatid=2〉.

  • Raymond, E. (1996). “The Cathedral and the Bazaar”. 〈http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedralbazaar/cathedral-bazaar〉.

  • Richardson, B. (2001). Impediments to Digital Trade: Testimony of Bonnie J.K. Richardson, V.P., Trade & Federal Affairs, Motion Picture Association of America, before the House Commerce Committee Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade & Consumer Protection. 〈www.mpaa.org/legislation/press/2001/2001_05_22.htm〉.

  • Sallstrom, L. & Damuth, R. (2004). DRAFT—“The Critical Role of the Software Industry in Economic Growth: Focus Peru”. 〈http://www.softwarechoice.org/download_files%5CPeru_Policy.pdf〉.

  • Shankeland, S. (2004). “Sun plans patent protection for open-source Solaris”. CNET News.com. 〈http://builder.com.com/5102-6371-5457967.html〉.

  • Schrerer, I. (2004). “U.S. vows to “fight” the Push for WIPO Reform”. Intellectual Property Watch 4/11/2004. http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=3D10&res=1024_ff&print=0.

  • Stallman, R. (1986). Lecture at Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (Royal Institute of Technology), Stockholm, Sweden, 30th October 1986, 〈http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/stallman-kth.html〉.

  • Tai, A. (2001). “The History of the GPL”. 〈http://www.free-soft.org/gpl_history〉.

  • Turner, D. (2002). “Anatomy of GPL violations”. FSF Bulletin, Issue 1, November 2002, 〈http://gnu.signal42.com/bulletins/bulletin-001.html#GPLViolations〉.

  • Turner, D. (2004). “GPL Compliance for Software Developers”. Online presentation. 〈http://www.novalis.org/talks/compliance-for-developers〉.

  • The United Nations (2005): The Least Developed Countries. 〈http://www.un.org/special-rep/ohrlls/ldc/list.htm〉.

  • Vaughan-Nichols, S. (2004). “Open Source Leader Takes Sun’s Schwartz to Task”. eWeek 26.11. 〈http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1731913,00.asp〉.

  • Weissman, R. (2003). “A Long, Strange Trips: The Pharmaceutical Industry Drive to Harmonize Global Intellectual Property Rules, and the Remaining WTO Legal Alternatives Available to Third World Countries”. 25 U. Pa. J. Int’l Econ. L. 1079.

  • Williams, S (2002). Free as in Freedom: Richard Stallman’s Crusade for Free Software. O’Reilly.

  • Wong, P. (2004). “Vietnam Adopts Formal FOSS Master Plan”. 〈http://www.asiaosc.org/article_195.html〉.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Oksanen works currently at Helsinki University of Technology as a researcher. He was a visiting scholar at UC-Berkeley 2001–2002 and is now preparing his Ph.D. on the economic rationality of copyright system in the University of Joensuu. Oksanen is currently a board member of Electronic Frontier Finland, which he co-founded in 2001. He’s also co-chairing European Digital Right’s IP working group.

He also teaches technology and intellectual property law as an adjunct professor at Helsinki University of Technology. Mr. Välimäki has consulted for software companies and is the author of a book on open source licensing (available at http://pub.turre.com/). Previously, Mr. Välimäki has been a visiting scholar at University of California, Berkeley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oksanen, V., Välimäki, M. Free software and copyright enforcement: A tool for global copyright policy?. Know Techn Pol 18, 101–112 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-006-1006-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-006-1006-6

Keywords

  • Intellectual Property
  • World Trade Organization
  • Free Software
  • Development Agendum
  • World Intellectual Property Organization