Skip to main content

Information needs in groundwater protection policy: Agenda-setting for knowledge development

Abstract

Water policymaking strongly depends on expert knowledge, and yet there is a gap between policy makers and research professionals. This article addresses this issue by presenting a conceptual framework and method for identification of information needs in a particular policymaking context. The framework deduces information needs not only from pertaining laws and regulations, but also from strategic stakeholder behavior that can be anticipated in this context. The outcome is then matched with empirically observed information needs and available knowledge. Framework and method have been applied to the Dutch groundwater protection policy situation, establishing their effectiveness in exploring strategies to stimulate knowledge development to match stakeholder information needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Barré, R. 2001. Expertise and Scientific Advice: the Risks of Fake Science and Fake Politics. The IPTS Report 60. Dec. 2001

  • Börzel, T.A. 1997. What’s So Special About Policy Networks? — An Exploration of the Concept and Its Usefulness in Studying European Governance, European Integration online Papers 1(8).

  • Bruijn, J.A. de, and E.F. ten Heuvelhof. 1995. Policy Networks and Governance. In Institutional Design, edited by D.L. Weimer, 161–179. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruijn, J.A. de, and E.F. ten Heuvelhof. 2000. Networks and decision making. Utrecht: Lemma publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G.B. and M.H. Olson. 1984. Management Information Systems — Conceptual foundations, Structure, and development. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findeisen, W. and E.S. Quade. 1985. The methodology of systems analysis: An introduction and overview. In: Handbook of systems analysis: Overview of uses, procedures, applications, and practice, edited by H.J. Miser and E.S. Quade, 117–149. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C.C. 1983. The tools of government. London: MacMillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoorens, S.K.G. 2001. Helder? Informatiebehoefte en -voorziening bij grondwaterbescherming in Nederland. Master’s Thesis (Dutch), Delft: Delft University of Technology — TNO-NITG 01-188-B

  • Kahneman, D., P. Slovic and A. Tversky, eds. 1982. Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenis, P. and V. Schneider. 1991. Policy networks and policy analysis: scrutinizing a new analytical toolbox. In: Policy networks — Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, edited by B. Marin and R. Mayntz. Frankfurt am Main/Boulder, Colorado: Campus Verlag/Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W.J.M. and J.F.M. Koppenjan. 1997. Public Management and Network Management: An Overview. In Managing Complex Networks — Strategies for the Public Sector, edited by W.J.M. Kickert, E.H. Klijn and J.F.M. Koppenjan, 35–61. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C.E. 1959. The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review 19(2), 78–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin, B. and R. Mayntz, eds. 1991. Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. 1993. Modernization and the logic of interorganizational networks. Knowledge and Policy 6(1), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nationale Raad voor Landbouwkundig Onderzoek — Adviesraad voor het Wetenschapsen Technologiebeleid — Raad voor het Milieu- en Natuuronderzoek. 2000. Over stromen — Kennis- en innovatieopgaven voor een waterrijk Nederland (Dutch). The Hague: SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R.A.W. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarpino, G.M., W.M. Dunn and I.I. Mitroff. 1983. Knowledge Acquisition for Policy Making: The role of conceptual models. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 4(3), 335–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1957. Models of Man: Social and Rational. Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

specializing in water management. He recently graduated on the main subject of policy analysis (MSc in 2001). He did his thesis research project at the Netherlands Institute of Geological Science TNO—National Geological Survey.

Educated in the field of computer science at Leiden University (MSc in 1985), his research interests have moved from decision support systems (PhD from Delft University of Technology in 1989) to methods and tools for policy analysis in general. He currently focuses on the development of Dynamic Actor Network Analysis (DANA) and a Modeling Environment for Design Impact Assessment (MEDIA).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoorens, S., Bots, P. Information needs in groundwater protection policy: Agenda-setting for knowledge development. Know Techn Pol 14, 75–93 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-002-1016-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-002-1016-y

Keywords

  • Information Item
  • Protection Zone
  • Knowledge Development
  • Object System
  • Strategic Position