Object of Inquiry: Psychology’s Other (Non-replication) Problem

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    John P. A. Ioannidis, “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False,” PLoS Med 2, no. 8 (2005), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1182327/; Reproducibility and Replicability in Science, National Academies of Science, Washington D. C, https://www8.nationalacademies.org/pa/projectview.aspx?key=49906;

    G. Gigerenzer, (Statistical rituals: The replication delusion and how we got there,” Psychological Science 1, no. 2018: 198-218; The Irreproducibility Crisis of Modern Science, National Association of Scholars, New York, https://www.nas.org/images/documents/NAS_irreproducibilityReport.pdf

  2. 2.

    M. Baker, “1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility: Survey sheds light on the ‘crisis’ rocking research,” Nature, https://www.nature.com/news/1-500-scientists-lift-the-lid-on-reproducibility-1.19970.

  3. 3.

    Despite a lengthy treatment by social psychologist and historian Kurt Danziger, Constructing the Subject (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1990).

  4. 4.

    E. B. Ford, R. A. Fisher, “An appreciation,” Genetics, 171(2005), 415-41; J. F. Box R. A. Fisher: The life of a scientist (Wiley, 1978).

  5. 5.

    John Staddon, Scientific Method: How science works, fails to work or pretends to work. (Routledge: Taylor and Francis, 2018).

  6. 6.

    G. Jahoda, “Quetelet and the emergence of the behavioral sciences.” Published online, September 2015: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559562/

  7. 7.

    R. A. Fisher, Statistical Methods for Research Workers. (Edinburgh, Oliver & Boyd: 1925), http://www.haghish.com/resources/materials/Statistical_Methods_for_Research_Workers.pdf

  8. 8.

    “Behavioral Economics,” Wikipedia.com, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_economics; J.E.R. Staddon, Limits to action: The allocation of individual behavior (New York: Academic Press, 1980) for similar approaches to learning in animals.

  9. 9.

    John Staddon, “Claude Bernard’s Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine,” The New Behaviorism, October 28, 2018, https://sites.duke.edu/behavior/2018/10/28/claude-bernards/

  10. 10.

    Gerd Gigerenzer raised questions like this: “How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond ‘Heuristics and Biases,’ in W. Stroebe, M. Hewstone European Review of Social Psychology 2 (1991): 83–115.

  11. 11.

    A. G. Walton, “A cost-benefit analysis of vaccines,” The Atlantic, January 23, 2012, ttps://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/01/a-cost-benefit-analysis-of-vaccines/251565/

  12. 12.

    Barthelow et al. “University-Affiliated Alcohol Marketing Enhances the Incentive Salience of Alcohol Cues,” Psychological Science 29, no 1 (2017): 83-94.

  13. 13.

    Faure et al., “Speech is silver, nonverbal behavior is gold: how implicit partner evaluations affect dyadic interactions in close relationships,” Psychological Science 29, no. 11 (2018): 1731-1741.

  14. 14.

    A. Karpinski, R. B. Steinman, R. B., “The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 (2016): 16–32.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Staddon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Staddon, J. Object of Inquiry: Psychology’s Other (Non-replication) Problem. Acad. Quest. 32, 246–256 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12129-019-09778-5

Download citation