Comparison of spatial ion distributions from different ionization sources
In order to optimize an ion mobility spectrometer (IMS) with respect to resolving power and sensitivity, the exact spatial ion density distribution generated by the used ionization source is of major interest. In this work, we investigate the two-dimensional (2D) spatial ion density distribution generated by a 63Ni source and the three-dimensional (3D) spatial ion density distributions generated by a radioactive 3H electron source, our non-radioactive electron source and an X-ray source. Therefore, we used an experimental setup consisting of the ionization source under investigation, an ionization region, a 5 mm short drift tube and a PCB Faraday detector segmented into stripe electrodes to measure the ion current. Repeating this measurement for different detector angles, the resulting 3D spatial ion density distribution can be calculated by image reconstruction. Furthermore, we varied the kinetic electron energy of our non-radioactive electron source in order to validate the simulated ion density distribution shown in previous work.
KeywordsSpatial ion density distribution Ion profiles Ion distribution APCI Ion generation Non-radioactive electron source X-ray-source Tritium source
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Cochems P, Runge M, Zimmermann S, Zimmermann S A miniaturized non-radioactive electron emitter for atmospheric pressure chemical ionization. 1131–1134Google Scholar
- 7.Heptner A, Reinecke T, Angerstein N, Zimmermann S (2017) A novel ion selective gas sensor based on pulsed atmospheric pressure chemical ionization and ion-ion-recombination. Sensors and Actuators B: ChemicalGoogle Scholar
- 20.Oliveira EF, Melo SB, Dantas CC, Vasconcelos DAA, Cadiz LF (2011) Comparison among tomographic reconstruction algorithms with a limited data. International Nuclear Atlantic ConferenceGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kak AC, Slaney M (2001) Principles of computerized tomographic imaging. Society for Industrial and Applied MathematicsGoogle Scholar
- 24.Eiceman GA, Karpas Z, Hill HH (2013) Ion mobility spectrometry. 3rd ed. CRC PressGoogle Scholar