Experimental determination of acetamiprid pesticide residue in three different types of pistachio by ion mobility spectrometry and using QuEChERS method in the different temperatures and in the presence of ammonia as dopant gas
- 71 Downloads
In this project, Ion Mobility Spectrometer (IMS) instrument in the positive mode and with corona ionization source was utilized to determine the residue of acetamiprid pesticide in three different types of pistachio (Akbari, Fandoghi and Kalachuchi). The QuEChERS method, notable because of easy and quick preparation of sample and using lower amounts of organic solvents with harmful environmental effects and high costs, was used in this study. Many experiments were performed in the different temperatures in order to obtain optimum temperature for cell and injection. Ammonia and acetone were considered as dopant substances and it turned out that the ammonia gas, contrary to acetone, increased significantly the signal intensity and sensitivity and avoided the overlap of desired peaks. The LOD of device for acetamiprid pesticide was estimated to be 0.5 μg g−1 and the LOQ of instrument was obtained as 1.66 μg g−1. The calibration curve was in the dynamic range between 0.5–11.5 μg g−1 and the Correlation Coefficient was 0.998. Also, the ion mobility and the reduced ion mobility were calculated for acetamiprid ion. After analysis of five samples with IMS instrument, the acetamiprid residue was determined and it turned out that it was under allowed limit in all three types of pistachio. In addition, the amount of acetamiprid residue was higher for Akbari type relative to Fandoghi and Kalachuchi ones. The reason for this observation is the higher vulnerability of Akbari trees to insects and pests and this in turn causes more pesticide to be consumed.
KeywordsIon mobility spectrometry Acetamiprid pesticide Pistachio QuEChERS method Temperature Dopant
The authors are thankful to Dr. Azra Abedi for useful discussions about this work.
- 1.Tomlin C (1994) The pesticide manual, 12th edn. The British Crop Protection Council, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
- 2.Matsuo H, Tomozawa M, Yamamoto I (1998) Structure-activity relationship of acyclic nicotinoid and neonicotinoids for insect nicotinic acetylcholin ion channel complex. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 37(1):17–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6327(1998)37:1<17::AID-ARCH3>3.0.CO;2-S CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Ohkawa H, Miyagawa H, Lee PW (2007) Pesticide chemistry, 11th edn. Wiley VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527611249
- 8.Martin A, Martinez Vidal JL, Egea Gonzalez FJ, Garrido Frenich A, Glass CR, Sykes M (2004) Assessment of potential (inhalation and dermal) and actual exposure to acetamiprid by greenhouse applicators using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 804(2):269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.01.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.John WW (2003) Conducting crop residue field trials in the USA, handbook of residue analytical methods for agrochemicals. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 26.Levine IN (2009) Physical chemistry, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 28.Mason EA (1984) Plasma chromatography, ion mobility: its Role in plasma chromatography, 2nd edn. In: Carr TW (Ed.), Plenum Press, New York https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:18057784
- 31.Bollan HR, Stone JA, Brokenshire JL, Rodriguez JE, Eiceman GA (2007) Mobility resolution and mass analysis of ions from ammonia and hydrazine complexes with ketones formed in air at ambient pressure. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 18(5):940–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2007.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Maximum Residue Levels for Pistachios (2017) Top export markets. www.americanpistachios.org/sites/default/files/APG%20MRL%20Chart%202016.pdf