Abstract
Changing family structure from joint to nuclear posits a challenge among older people. Increasing prevalence of nuclear family promotes household headship among older adults but leaves them vulnerable as they have to live alone at older ages. Therefore, the study aims to estimate the trends and determine the factors associated with household headship among older adults from 1992-93 to 2015–16. The analysis of this paper is based on four rounds of the National Family Health Survey, which were conducted during the periods between 1992-93, 1998–99, 2005–06, and 2015–16, respectively. The study carried out bivariate and multivariate analysis to observe the association between outcome and independent variables. Results found that household headship among older adults had increased from 59.5% in 1992–93 to 67.8% in 2015–16. Further, the study found a rise in the proportion of nuclear families and household headship among older adults from 1992-93 to 2015–16. In older ages, household headship was more among older women than older men. The likelihood of household headship among older adults in a joint family is low as compared to household headship in a nuclear family. While the rise in household headship among older adults may be attributable to a variety of socio-economic influences, it has been noted that household headship among older adults has varied between men and women and by type of family structure. Moreover, there was a clear relationship between headship and wealth status of a household.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adhikari, R., Soonthorndhada, K., & Haseen, F. (2011). Labor force participation in later life: Evidence from a cross-sectional study in Thailand. BMC Geriatrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-11-15.
Bhat, A. K., & Dhruvarajan, R. (2001). Ageing in India : Drifting intergenerational relations, challenges and options. Ageing and Society, 21(5), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X0100842X.
Bruce, Judith, & Daisy Dwyer. A home divided: Women and income in the third world. Stanford University Press, 1988, p. 304, www.sup.org/books/title/?id=2590. Accessed 27 Sep 2020.
Burr, J. A. (1992). Household status and headship among unmarried Asian Indian women in later Life:Availability, Feasibility, and Desirability Factors. Research on Aging. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027592142003.
Chadha, N. K. (2012). Intergenerational Relationships: an Indian Perspective. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/INTERGENERATIONAL-RELATIONSHIPS%3A-AN-INDIAN-Chadha/d67c3b3f9536a40ad3a9147213b73eaa6803e047
Chang, Q., Conwell, Y., Wu, D., Guo, Y., & Yip, P. S. F. (2019). A study on household headship, living arrangement, and recipient of pension among the older adults in association with suicidal risks. Journal of Affective Disorders, 256, 618–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.033.
Choithani, C. (2019). Gendered livelihoods: Migrating men, left-behind women and household food security in India. Gender, Place and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2019.1681366.
Cristina, F., Andrade, D., & Devos, S. (2016). An Analysis of Living Arrangements Among Elderly Women in Brazil *. abep.org.br. Retrieved from http://www.abep.org.br/publicacoes/index.php/anais/article/download/1245/1209.
Das, B. (2017). Condition of the aged in national capital territory of Delhi. In Marginalization in globalizing Delhi: Issues of land, livelihoods and health (pp. 387-401). Springer, New Delhi.
Dwyer, D., & Bruce, J. (1988). A home divided: Women and income in the third world.
Fingerman, K. L., Chen, P.-C., Hay, E., Cichy, K. E., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2005). Ambivalent reactions in the parent and offspring relationship. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 60(Special_Issue_2), S99–S108. https://doi.org/10.1093/GERONB.
Gee, E. M. (2000). Living arrangements and quality of life among Chinese Canadian elders. Social Indicators Research, 51, 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007036122117.
Glaser, K., Tomassini, C., & Stuchbury, R. (2005). Differences over time in the relationship between partnership disruptions and support in early old age in Britain. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 60(Special_Issue_2), S99–S108. https://doi.org/10.1093/GERONB.
Glaser, K., Stuchbury, R., Price, D., Di Gessa, G., Ribe, E., & Tinker, A. (2018). Trends in the prevalence of grandparents living with grandchild(ren) in selected European countries and the United States. European Journal of Ageing, 15, 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-018-0474-3.
Gordon, M., Whelan, B., & Vaughan, R. (1981). Old age and loss of household headship: A National Irish Study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43(3), 741. https://doi.org/10.2307/351773.
Head, J., Chungkham, H. S., Hyde, M., Zaninotto, P., Alexanderson, K., Stenholm, S., & Vahtera, J. (2016). Socioeconomic differences in healthy life expectancy: Evidence from four prospective cohort studies: Jenny Head. The European Journal of Public Health, 26(suppl_1), ckw171-050. https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article-abstract/26/suppl_1/ckw171.050/2448935.
Hochschild, A. R. (1975). Disengagement theory: A critique and proposal. American Sociological Review, 40(5), 553. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094195.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). (1995). National Family Health Survey (MCH and family planning), 1992–93: India. Mumbai: IIPS.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. (2017). National family health survey (NFHS-4), 2015–16: India. Mumbai: IIPS.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. (2007). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India. Mumbai: IIPS.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ORC Macro. (2000). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998–99: India. Mumbai: IIPS.
Irudaya Rajan, S., & Kumar, S. (2003). Living arrangements among Indian elderly: New Evidence from National Family Health. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(1), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/4413048.
Irudaya, R. S., Mishra, U. S., & Sarma, P. S. (2001). Health concerns among India’s elderly. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 53(3), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.2190/19WH-50YR-QAKG-C8VR.
Jahangir, M. S., & Shafi, A. (2013). An appraisal of gender mainstreaming in census of India 2011. Advances in Applied Sociology., 03, 215–221. https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2013.35029.
Kim, E. H. W. (2015). Public transfers and living alone among the elderly: A case study of orea’s new income support program. Demographic Research, 32(1), 1383–1408. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.50.
Klasen, S., Lechtenfeld, T., & Povel, F. (2010). What about the women? Female headship, Poverty and Vulnerability in Thailand and Vietnam. German Development Economics Conference, 43.
Kuznets, S. (1978). Size and age structure of family households : Exploratory comparisons. Population and Development Review, 4(2), 187–223.
Lam, J., Duy, D., & Henning-Smith, C. (2017). Activity limitations and intergenerational coresidence. In Population Association of America (PAA).
Lin, I.-F. (2008). Mother and daughter reports about upward transfers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 815–827. https://doi.org/10.2307/40056370.
Lowenstein, A. (2005). Solidarity–conflict and ambivalence: Testing two conceptual frameworks and their impact on quality of life for older family members. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 60(Special_Issue_2), S99–S108. https://doi.org/10.1093/GERONB.
Mindel, C. H. (1979). Multigenerational family households: Recent trends and implications for the future. Gerontologist, 19(5), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/19.5_Part_1.456.
Mobolaji, J. W., Asiazobor, F., & Akinyemi, A. I. (2018). Household structure and living arrangements among older persons in selected west africa countries: Evidence from demographic and health surveys. African Popuation Studies, 32(3), 4530–4541. https://doi.org/10.11564/32-3-1234.
Mutchler, J. E. (1990). Household composition among the nonmarried elderly: A comparison of black and white women. Research on Aging, 12(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027590124006.
Phua, V. C., Kaufman, G., & Park, K. S. (2001). Strategic adjustments of elderly asian americans: Living arrangements and headship. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32(2), 263–281. +iii+vii+xi. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.32.2.263.
Ramnarain, S. (2016). Unpacking widow headship and Agency in Post-Conflict Nepal. Feminist Economics, 22, 80–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2015.1075657.
Rosenhouse, S. (1988). Identifying the poor: is "headship" a useful concept? (English). Living standards measurement study (LSMS) working paper; no. LSM 58. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
Rosero-Bixby, L. (2018). High life expectancy and reversed socioeconomic gradients of elderly people in Mexico and Costa Rica. Demographic Research, 38, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.3.
Ruwali, P. N. (2019). Changing Social Institutions: With Reference to the Family in India. Quest-The Journal of UGC-HRDC Nainital, 13(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-0035.2019.00016.0.
Shah, A. (1999). Changes in the family and the elderly. Economic and Political Weekly, 34(20), 1179–1182. Retrieved September 27, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4407956
Singa, D. (1982). Some recent changes in the Indian family and their implications for socialisation. The Indian Journal of Social Work, 45(3), 271–286.
Singh, A., & Ladusingh, L. (2016). Life expectancy at birth and life disparity: An assessment of sex differentials in mortality in India. International Journal of Population Studies. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijps.2016.01.005.
Singh, V., & Murry, B. (2019). Headship influence on population structure in Khasi Matriarchal Society. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(2), 665–668. https://doi.org/10.5958/2321-5828.2019.00108.6.
Sinha, D. (1982). Some recent changes in the indian family and their implications for socialisatioN.
Smyth, L. (2016). The disorganized family: Institutions, practices and normativity. British Journal of Sociology, 67, 678–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12217.
Steiner, P. O., & Dorfman, R. (1957). The economic status of the aged. Univ of California Press.
Swain, P., & Pillai, V. K. (2005). Living arrangements among single mothers in India. Canadian Studies in Population. https://doi.org/10.25336/p6q889.
Tariang, W., & Thomas, E. D. (2018). Poverty and inequality in the matrilineal Society of Meghalaya in the north-eastern region of India. Forum for Social Economics, 49, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2018.1441047.
Unisa, S., & Datta, N. (2005). Female headship in India : Levels, Differentials And Impact. In International Union for the Scientific Study of Population XXV International Population Conference Tours.
Vardhan, R. (1999). Female headed households in patriarchal society: A sociological study. Indian Publishers & Distributors.
Varley, A. (1996). Women heading households: Some more equal than others? World Development, 24(3), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00149-7.
Youssef, N. H., & Hetler, C. B. (1983). Establishing the economic condition of women-headed households in the third world: A new approach. Johns Hopkins Baltimore.
Availability of Data and Material
This study was based on a large dataset that is publicly available on DHS website (https://dhsprogram.com/data/) conducted by the MOHFW and International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) in India with ethical standards being complied with including informed consent obtained from participants.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceived and designed the research paper: SS and SKS; analysed the data: PK and NP; Contributed agents/materials/analysis tools: SS and PK; Wrote the manuscript: SC and RP, Refined the manuscript: SS and SKS.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Ethical Treatment of Experimental Subjects (Animals and Humans)
No experimental treatment was conducted on either human or animal subjects in this study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srivastava, S., Chauhan, S., Patel, R. et al. Does Change in Family Structure Affect the Household Headship among Older Adults in India? A Gendered Perspective. Ageing Int 47, 1–19 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-020-09401-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-020-09401-x