“‘Call Security’: Locks, Risk, Privacy and Autonomy in Long-term Residential Care”

Abstract

Locked doors and secure units are often used as a solution in long-term residential care (LTRC) for residents with moderate to severe dementia who are at risk for wandering and potentially harming themselves or others. This practice creates important quality of life implications for residents as well as for employees. In this paper we explore broader assumptions, connotations and possibilities of LTRC built environments by comparing and contrasting the use of and philosophies regarding the locking of doors and entire units in facilities that maintain this practice to those that have open doors, open units and other accessible physical spaces. This sub-study is part of a larger international, interdisciplinary study that uses rapid site-switching ethnography within a feminist political economy framework to investigate promising practices in LTRC. Field observations and interviews with management, health providers, support staff, informal care providers, union representatives, residents and family members were conducted in 27 sites, 10 of which we elected to include for the purpose of this paper, located in Nova Scotia, Ontario, Manitoba, and British Columbia (BC), Canada, as well as Norway, Germany and the United Kingdom (UK). Locked doors and units, and inaccessible physical spaces affect the balance between “home” and “institution” in LTRC facilities in numerous ways including privacy, mobility and autonomy of residents, the ability to remain socially connected within the home, possibilities of integration with the larger community and overall quality of life and care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    All participants’ names have been replaced by pseudonyms in order to maintain anonymity.

References

  1. Armstrong, P., & Braedley, S. (Eds.). (2013). Troubling care: critical perspectives on research and practices. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baer, L. D., & Ravneberg, B. (2008). The outside and inside in Norwegian and English prisons. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 90(2), 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Banerjee, A., Daly, T., Armstrong, P., Szebehely, M., Armstrong, H., & Lafrance, S. (2012). Structural violence in long-term, residential care for older people: comparing Canada and Scandinavia. Social Science & Medicine, 74(3), 390–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Detweiler, M., Murphy, P., Myers, L., & Kim, K. (2008). Does a wander garden influence inappropriate behaviors in dementia residents? American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 23(1), 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Douglas, M. (1991). The idea of a home: a kind of space. Social Research, 58(1), 287.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ewing, R., Schmid, T., Killingsworth, R., Zlot, A., & Raudenbush, S. (2008). Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity. In J. M. Marzluff, E. Shulenberger, W. Endlicher, M. Alberti, G. Bradley, C. Ryan, et al. (Eds.), Urban ecology (pp. 567–582). New York: Springer US.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foucault, M. (1998 [1967]). Different spaces. In M. Foucault (Ed.), Aesthetics, method, and epistemology. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frumkin, H., Frank, L. D., & Jackson, R. (2004). Urban sprawl and public health: designing, planning, and building for healthy communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Government of Ontario. (2015). Bringing care home: report of the expert group on home and community care. Accessed from http://health.gov.on.ca/en/public/programs/ccac/docs/hcc_report.pdf

  10. Guse, L. W., & Masesar, M. A. (1999). Quality of life and successful aging in long-term care: perceptions of residents. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 20(6), 527–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heggestad, A. K. T., Nortvedt, P., & Slettebo, A. (2013). ‘Like a prison without bars’: dementia and experiences of dignity. Nursing Ethics, 20(8), 881–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leyden, K. M. (2003). Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1546–1551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Milligan, C. (2009). There’s no place like home: place and care in an ageing society. In Farnham, England. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morgan, L. (2009). Balancing safety and privacy: the case of room locks in assisted living. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 23, 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Renn, O. (2008). Concepts of risk: an interdisciplinary review. Gaia, 17(1), 50–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rybczynksi, W. (1986). Home: a short history of an idea. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sherman, A. M., Shumaker, S. A., Rejeski, W. J., Morgan, T., Applegate, W. B., & Ettinger, W. (2006). Social support, social integration, and health-related quality of life over time: results from the fitness and arthritis in seniors trial (FAST). Psychology & Health, 21(4), 463–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sjöberg, L. (2006). Rational risk perception: utopia or dystopia? Journal of Risk Research, 9(6), 683–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stigsdotter, U. K., Ekholm, O., Schipperijn, J., Toftager, M., Kamper-Jørgensen, F., & Randrup, T. B. (2010). Health promoting outdoor environments—Associations between green space, and health, health-related quality of life and stress based on a Danish national representative survey. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38(4), 411–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sugiyama, T., Thompson, C., & Alves, S. (2009). Associations between neighborhood open space attributes and quality of life for older people in Britain. Environment and Behavior, 41(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. WHOQOL Group. (1995). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth Lowndes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Informed Consent

All participants interviewed in this study read and signed informed consents.

Ethical Treatment of Experimental Subjects (Animal and Human)

Ethical approval was obtained for this research from York University Research Ethics Board and in all jurisdictions requiring further ethics approval.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tufford, F., Lowndes, R., Struthers, J. et al. “‘Call Security’: Locks, Risk, Privacy and Autonomy in Long-term Residential Care”. Ageing Int 43, 34–52 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-017-9289-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Feminist political economy
  • Ethnography
  • Long-term care
  • Elder care
  • Nursing home design
  • Homelike versus institution
  • Locks
  • Risk