Advertisement

Ageing International

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 219–228 | Cite as

Continuity and Change in Norwegian Nursing Homes, in the Context of Norwegian Welfare State Ambitions

  • Frode F. JacobsenEmail author
Article
  • 169 Downloads

Abstract

The high investment by the Norwegian state and the Norwegian municipalities in terms of material and human resources enhances the opportunities for achieving a homelike and meaningful environment for the residents at the same time as offering high quality professional care. However, obstacles which may be overcome without an increased economic spending, hamper developments. The present work, based on ethnographic fieldwork over a time span of 25 years (1988–2013), supports the view that care for residents in Norwegian NHs is characterized more by historical continuity than by change, for good and for worse.

Keywords

Nursing homes Norway Welfare state Physical surroundings Routines Continuity Change 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Professor Anneli Hujala at University of Eastern Finland and PhD student Gudmund Ågotnes at Centre for Care Research - Western Norway, Bergen University College, for valuable comments.

Conflict of Interest

Frode F Jacobsen declares no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

As there is no person or personal data appearing in the paper, there is no one from whom a permission should be obtained in order to publish personal data.

Ethical Treatment of Experimental Subjects (Animal and Human)

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the author.

References

  1. Akre, T., & Hauan, A. (2009). Tverretatlig kommunenettverk innen utvikling av omsorgstilbud til morgendagens eldre. Sammenheng mellom omgivelser, helse og livskvalitet. Oslo: Norsk Form.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, Jonas E. (2011a). Architecture and ageing. On the interaction between frail older people and the built environment. Doctoral thesis. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, Jonas E. (2011b). The Nordic model. Evolutions in care and space for the dependent ageing in Sweden with some relevance to Denmark and Norway. Paper presented at the international conference “Innovations in nursing for people in situations of dependency: architectural design and care models”, Madrid 30th Nov to 1st Dec 2011.Google Scholar
  4. Christensen, Karen & Syltevik, Liv J. (red.). (1999). Omsorgens forvitring? Antologi om velferdspolitiske utfordringer. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  5. Danielsen, K. (2008). Hjem og hjemlighet gjennom livsløpet. In I. Solveig Hauge & F. F. Jacobsen (Eds.), Hjem. Eldre og hjemlighet (pp. 35–48). Oslo: Cappelen Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Goffman, E. (1966). Asylums. Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  7. Graverholt, B., et al. (2013). Acute hospital admissions from NHs: predictors of unwarranted variation? Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 41, 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamran, Torunn. (1996). Effektivisering versus samfunnsansvar. I Olaug S. Lian (red.): Helsetjenesten i samfunnsvitenskapens lys. Oslo, Norway: Tano Aschehoug, pp.131-146.Google Scholar
  9. Harrington, C., et al. (2007). Nurse staffing levels and medicaid reimbursement rates in nursing facilities. Health Services Research, 42, 1105–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harrington, C., et al. (2012). NH staffing standards and staffing levels in six countries. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 44, 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hauge, Solveig. (2004). Jo mere vi er sammen, jo gladere vi blir? Ein feltmetodisk studie av sjukeheimen som heim. Doctoral Dissertation. Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  12. Jacobsen, F. F. (2005). Cultural discontinuity as an organizational resource: Nursing in a Norwegian NH. Bergen: NLA-Forlaget.Google Scholar
  13. Jacobsen, F. F. (2010). Omsorgens kroppslige og arkitektoniske vilkår: et fokus på kontinuitet framfor endring i omsorgsarbeid i norske sykehjem”. Michael Publication Series for the Norwegian Medical Association, 7(2), 167–169.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobsen, F. F. (2008a). Intimitet, eksklusivitet og rytmer i norske hjem og sykehjem. In H. Solveig & F. F. Jacobsen (Eds.), Hjem. Eldre og hjemlighet (pp. 87–99). Oslo: Cappelen Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Jacobsen, F. F. (2008b). Rom for omsorg, rom for makt. In E. Gjengedal, A. Schiøtz, & A. Blystad (Eds.), Helse i tid og rom (pp. 149–164). Oslo: Cappelen Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Jacobsen, Frode F. and Mekki, Tone E. (2011). Health and the changing welfare state in Norway: a focus on municipal health care for elderly sick. Ageing International, Vol.35, No.3 (Special Issue).Google Scholar
  17. Larsen, Toril Agnete. (1999). Stellet i sykepleien: i samspillet mellom kropp og livserfaring. Master thesis. Tromsø, Norway: University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
  18. Lundgren, E. (2000). Homelike housing for elderly people—materialized ideology. Housing Theory and Society, 17, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. OECD. (2011). Health at a glance 2011: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Olsen, R. V. (1984). The effect of the hospital environment: patient reactions to traditional versus progressive care settings. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 1, 121–36.Google Scholar
  21. Sandvoll, Anne M. et al. (2012). New quality regulations versus established NH practice: a qualitative study. BMJ Nurs No.7 Vol.11, open access.Google Scholar
  22. Selbæk, G., et al. (2007). The prevalence of psychiatric symptoms and behavioural disturbances and the use of psychotropic drugs in Norwegian NHs. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 22, 843–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Statistics Norway. (2007). Indikatorer for kvalitet i kommunenes helse- og sosialtjeneste. Oslo: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
  24. Statistics Norway. (2012). Pleie og omsorg - kvalitet. Oslo: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Care Research – Western NorwayBergen University CollegeBergenNorway
  2. 2.Betanien University CollegeBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations