Ageing International

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 46–65 | Cite as

Technology and Aging Project: Training Outcomes and Efficacy from a Randomized Field Trial

  • Amanda T. Woodward
  • Paul P. Freddolino
  • Christina M. Blaschke-Thompson
  • Dona J. Wishart
  • Louanne Bakk
  • Rie Kobayashi
  • Caitlin Tupper


This study examined whether training provided to adults age 60+ would increase the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs), such as email and the Internet, and influence participants’ social support and mental health. Participants were randomly assigned to an experimental (n = 45) or a control group (n = 38). The experimental group participated in a six-month training program. Data were collected before, during, and after training on outcomes related to computer use, social support, and mental health. Mixed regression models were used for multivariate analyses. Compared to the control group, the experimental group reported greater self-efficacy in executing computer-related tasks and used more ICTs, perceived greater social support from friends, and reported significantly higher quality of life. Computer self-efficacy had both a direct and indirect effect on ICT use, but not on other variables. With appropriate training, older adults want to and can learn the skills needed to use ICTs. Older adults with ICT skills can access online sources of information regarding Medicare Part D options and utilize patient portals associated with electronic medical records. Agencies may develop services that build upon this technology sophistication, but policies also will need to address issues of access to equipment and high-speed Internet service.


Gerontology Information and communication technologies (ICTs) Older adults Computer training Social support Mental health 


  1. ABCNews. (2007). Japanese grannies go high-tech. Available at Cited 30 August 2008.
  2. Adams, N., Stubbs, D., & Woods, V. (2005). Psychological barriers to Internet usage among older adults in the UK. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine, 30(1), 3–17. doi:10.1080/14639230500066876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler R. (2006) Older Americans, broadband and the future of the Net. Available via SeniorNet. Cited 30 August 2008.
  4. Alexopoulous, G. S. (2005). Depression in the elderly. Lancet, 365(9475), 1961–1970. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66665-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Antonucci, T. C. (1986). Social support networks: hierarchical mapping technique. Generations, 10, 10–12.Google Scholar
  6. Blaschke, C. M., Freddolino, P. P., & Mullen, E. E. (2009). Ageing and technology: A review of the research literature. British Journal of Social Work, 39(4), 641–656. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blazer, D. G. (2003). Depression in late life: Review and commentary. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58A(3), 249–265.Google Scholar
  8. Blit-Cohen, E., & Litwin, H. (2004). Elder participation in cyberspace: a qualitative analysis of Israeli retirees. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradley, N., & Poppen, W. (2003). Assistive technology, computers and Internet may decrease sense of isolation for homebound elderly and disabled persons. Technology and Disability, 15, 19–25.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, R. J. (2004). Older women and the Internet. Journal of Women & Aging, 16(1/2), 161–174. doi:10.1300/J074v16n01_11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carpenter, B. D., & Bunday, S. (2007). Computer use among older adults in a naturally occurring retirement community. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 3012–3024. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.08.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, F., & Straka, S. M. (2000) Internet access for frail seniors: The Connections experience. Available via McGill Centre for Studies in Aging. Cited 30 August 2008.
  13. Commission of the European Communities (EU). (2007). Ageing Well in the Information Society. Available from: Cited 30 August 2008.
  14. Cutler, S. J., & Hendricks, J. (2001). Emerging social trends: The information revolution. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (5th ed.). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  15. Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A., et al. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 333–352. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Czaja, S. J., & Lee, C. C. (2003). The impact of the Internet on older adults. In N. Charness & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), The impact of technology on successful aging. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Czaja, S. J., & Lee, C. C. (2007). The impact of aging on access to technology. Universal Access in the Information Society, 5(4), 341–349. doi:10.1007/s10209-006-0060-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Jong Gierveld, J., & Van Tilburg, T. (2006). A 6-item scale for overall, emotional, and social loneliness: confirmatory tests on survey data. Research on Aging, 28(5), 582–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deollos, I., & Morris, D. (2004). The impact of ownership, use of attitudes toward PC's on older adults' feelings of loneliness. Gerontologist, 44(1), 526.Google Scholar
  20. Eastman, J. K., & Iyer, R. (2004). The elderly's use and attitude towards the Internet. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(3), 208–220. doi:10.1108/07363760410534759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fees, B. S., Martin, P., & Poon, L. W. (1999). A model of loneliness in older adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54B(4), 231–238.Google Scholar
  22. Flanagan, J. C. (1978). A research approach to improving our quality of life. The American Psychologist, 33(2), 138–147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.33.2.138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fox, S. (2004), Older Americans and the Internet. Available from Pew Internet & American Life Project Cited 30 August 2008.
  24. Fox, S. (2010) Four in ten seniors go online. Available from Pew Internet & American Life Project Cited 30 August 2008.
  25. Gilleard, C., Hyde, M., & Higgs, P. (2007). Community and communication in the third age: the impact of Internet and cell phone use on attachment to place in later life in England. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62B(4), S276–S283.Google Scholar
  26. Hagberg, J. E. (2004). Old people, new and old artefacts—technology for later life. In B. Oberg, A. L. Narvanen, E. Nasman, & E. Olsson (Eds.), Changing worlds and the ageing subject: Dimensions in the study of ageing and later life. England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  27. Hickman, J. M., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2007). Training older adults to use new technology. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62B, 77–84.Google Scholar
  28. Irizarry, C., Downing, A., & West, D. (2002). Promoting modern technology and Internet access for under-represented older populations. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 19(4), 13–30. doi:10.1300/J017v19v04_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krause, N. (2001). Social support. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (5th ed., pp. 272–294). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  30. Manna, W. C., Belchior, P., Tomita, M. R., & Kemp, B. J. (2005). Computer use by middle-aged and older adults with disabilities. Technology and Disability, 17(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  31. Marquie, J. C., Jourdan-Boddaert, L., & Huet, N. (2002). Do older adults underestimate their actual computer knowledge? Behaviour & Information Technology, 21(4), 273–280. doi:10.1080/0144929021000020998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marziali, E., & Donahue, P. (2006). Caring for others: Internet video-conferencing group intervention for family caregivers of older adults with neurogenerative disease. Gerontologist, 46(3), 398–403.Google Scholar
  33. Melenhorst, A. S., Rogers, W. A., & Caylor, E. C. (2001). The use of communication technologies by older adults: exploring the benefits from the user's perspective. Paper presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 45th Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
  34. Morgan, R. E. (2005). Technology meets the age wave. Gerontologist, 45(5), 704–710.Google Scholar
  35. Morrell, R. W., Mayhorn, C. B., & Bennett, J. (2000). A survey of world wide web use in middle-aged and older adults. Human Factors, 42(2), 175–182. doi:10.1518/001872000779656444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Murphy, C. A., Coover, D., & Owens, S. V. (1989). Development and validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 893–899. doi:10.1177/001316448904900412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nahm, E., & Resnick, B. (2001). Homebound older adults’ experiences with the Internet and e-mail. Computers in Nursing, 19(6), 257–263.Google Scholar
  38. Nair, S. N., Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2007). A multilevel modeling approach to examining individual differences in skill acquisition for a computer-based task. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62B, 85–96.Google Scholar
  39. Namazi, K. H., & McClintic, M. (2003). Computer use among elderly persons in long-term care facilities. Educational Gerontology, 29(6), 535–550. doi:10.1080/713844391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Novak, M. (2006). Issues in aging. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  41. Osman, A., Poulson, D., & Nicolle, C. (2005). Introducing computers and the Internet to older users: findings from the Care OnLine project. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(1), 16–23. doi:10.1007/s10209-005-0111-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2008). Demographics of Internet Users. Available from Cited 30 August 2008.
  43. Pfeil, U., Zaphiris, P., & Wilson, S. (2009). Older adults’ perceptions and experiences of online social support. Interacting with Computers, 21(3), 159–172. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondai, A. (2005). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata. College Station: Stata.Google Scholar
  45. Rodriguez, M. D., Gonzalez, V. M., Favela, J., & Santana, P. C. (2009). Home-based communication system for older adults and their remote family. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 609–618. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Russell, M. (1999). Online learning communities: implications for adult learning. Adult Learning, 10(4), 28–31.Google Scholar
  47. Saunders, E. J. (2004). Maximizing computer use among the elderly in rural senior centers. Educational Gerontology, 30, 573–585. doi:10.1080/03601270490466967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Selwyn, N. (2004). The information aged: a qualitative study of older adults' use of information and communications technology. Journal of Aging Studies, 18(4), 369–384. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2004.06.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., Furlong, J., & Madden, L. (2003). Older adults' use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing Society, 23, 561–582. doi:10.1017/S0144686X03001302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sherer, M. (1997). Introducing computers to frail residents of homes for the aged. Educational Gerontology, 23(4), 345–358. doi:10.1080/0360127970230404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Slegers, K., van Boxtel, M. P. J., & Jolles, J. (2008). Effects of computer training and Internet usage on the well-being and quality of life of older adults: a randomized, controlled study. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63B(3), 176–184.Google Scholar
  52. StataCorp. (2001). Statistical software: release 10.1. College Station: Stata Corporation.Google Scholar
  53. Swindell, R. (2000). A U3A without walls: using the Internet to reach out to isolated older people. Education and Ageing, 15(2), 251–263.Google Scholar
  54. The Economist. (2008). E-readiness rankings 2008: Maintaining momentum. Available from Cited 30 August 2008.
  55. United Nations. (2008). The global information society: A statistical view. Available from Cited 30 August 2008.
  56. vanBerlo, A., & vanValen, C. (1998). First experiences in using e-mail and Internet by elderly living in sheltered housing. In J. Graafmans, V. Taipale, & N. Charness (Eds.), Gerontechnology: A sustainable investment in the future. Amsterdam: IOS.Google Scholar
  57. Weeks, D. J. (1994). A review of loneliness concepts with particular reference to old age. International Journal of Geriatric PsychiatryInt J Geriatr Psych, 9(5), 345–355. doi:10.1002/gps.930090502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. West, B., Welch, K. B., & Galecki, A. T. (2006). Linear mixed models: A practical guide using statistical software. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
  59. White, H., McConnell, E., Clipp, E., Branch, L. G., Sloane, R., Pieper, C., et al. (2002). A randomized controlled trial of the psychosocial impact of providing Internet training and access to older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 6(3), 213–221. doi:10.1080/13607860220142422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. White, H., McConnell, E., Clipp, E., Bynum, L., Teague, C., Navas, L., et al. (1999). Surfing the Net in later life: a review of the literature and pilot study of computer use and quality of life. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 18(3), 358–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. White, J., & Weatherall, A. (2000). A grounded theory analysis of older adults and information technology. Educational Gerontology, 26, 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wright, D., & Hill, T. (2009). Prescription for trouble: Medicare Part D and patterns of computer and Internet access among the elderly. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 21(2), 172–186. doi:10.1080/08959420902732514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Xie, B. (2007). Information technology education for older adults as a continuing peer-learning process: a Chinese case study. Educational Gerontology, 33, 429–450. doi:10.1080/03601270701252872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Xie, B., & Bugg, J. M. (2009). Public library computer training for older adults to access high-quality Internet health information. Library & Information Science Research, 31(3), 155–162. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2009.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., et al. (1982). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17(1), 37–49. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amanda T. Woodward
    • 1
  • Paul P. Freddolino
    • 1
  • Christina M. Blaschke-Thompson
    • 1
  • Dona J. Wishart
    • 2
  • Louanne Bakk
    • 1
  • Rie Kobayashi
    • 3
  • Caitlin Tupper
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Social WorkMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Otsego County Commission on AgingGaylordUSA
  3. 3.School of Social WorkEastern Washington UniversityCheneyUSA

Personalised recommendations