Skip to main content
Log in

Consumer choice and employer-sponsored health insurance

  • Published:
Ageing International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robert Kaestner addresses the tensions between employers and employees in providing consumer choice and health insurance. The author points out that the dominance of employer-sponsored insurance in the private payer market stems from the favorable tax considerations of such insurance that allows employees to obtain insurance without being taxed on its value, and from the market and administrative efficiencies associated with insuring large groups. Given its numerical importance, changes in employer-sponsored insurance related to benefits provided, choice of providers, and employee contributions largely determine the amount of choice non-elderly consumers have with respect to health insurance. More importantly, it is widely believed that the design of, and changes to, employer-sponsored health insurance plans are under the control of the employer with little input from employees. However, Kaestner emphasizes that it is theemployee who pays for health insurance, despite the perception that this is an employer cost. These beliefs lead to the conclusion that consumers don’t have much choice about health insurance and are dependent on the employer. The author’s goal in this essay is to show that this conventional wisdom is incorrect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, Daniel, David Cutler, and Richard Zeckhauser. (2000). “Enrollee Mix, Treatment Intensity, and Cost in Competing Indemnity and HMO Plans.” NBER Working Paper No. 7832, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Buchmueller, Thomas. (2000). “The Business Case for Employer-provided Health Benefits.” Unpublished manuscript, California Healthcare Foundation.

  • Council for Affordable Insurance. “Mandated Health Insurance Benefits.”CAHI Policy Brief 1:6 (1997): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Affordable Insurance. (2004). “Health Insurance Mandates in the States 2004.” URL: http://www.cahi.org/cahi_contents/resources/pdf/Mandatepub2004Electronic.pdf, last accessed October 4, 2004.

  • Cutler, David. (2004).Your Money or Your Life: Strong Medicine for America’s Health Care System. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, David, Mark McClellan, and Joseph Newhouse. “How Does Managed Care Do It?”Rand Journal of Economics 31:3 (2000): 526548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Employee Benefits Research Institute. (2003).Health Confidence Survey. URL:www.ebri.org/hcs/, accessed September 20, 2004.

  • Glied, Sherry. (2000). “Managed Care,” inHandbook of Health Economics, Volume 1. Chapter 13. Elsevier Science B.V.

  • Goodman, John C., and Merrill Mathews. (1997). “The Cost of Health Insurance Mandates.” National Center for Policy Analysis Brief Analysis #237. Dallas, TX: National Center for Policy Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, Jonathan. (1998). “Health Insurance and the Labor Market.” NBER Working Paper No. 6762. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaestner, Robert, and Kosali Ilyaperuma Simon. “The Labor Market Consequences of State Health Insurance Regulation.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 56:1 (2002): 136–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser Family Foundation. (2004).Employer Health Benefits: 2004 Annual Survey. URL:www.kff.org/insurance/7148/index.cfm, accessed on September 14, 2004.

  • Levit, Katherine, Cynthia Smith, Cathy Cowan, Art Sensenig, Aaron Catlin, and the Health Accounts Team. “Health Spending Rebound Continues in 2002.”Health Affairs 23:1 (2004): 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, Willard G., Joseph P. Newhouse, Naihua Duan, Emmett B. Keeler, and Arleen Leibowitz. “Health Insurance and the Demand for Medical Care: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment.”American Economic Review 77:3 (1987): 251–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mays, Glen P., Robert E. Hurley, and Joy M. Grossman. “An Empty Toolbox? Changes in Health Plans’ Approaches for Managing Costs.”Health Services Research 38:1 (2003): 75–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, Thomas. (2000). “Physician Agency.”Handbook of Health Economics (chap. 9, pp. 461–528), ed. A. J. Culyer and J. P. Newhouse. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Robert, and Harold Luft “Does Managed Care Lead to Better or Worse Quality of Care?”Health Affairs 16:5 (1997): 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse, Joseph. “Medical Care Costs: How Much Welfare Loss?”Journal of Economic Perspectives 6:3 (1992): 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Russ. “A Rising Call for Quality Healthcare.”APA Monitor 29:8 (1998): unnumbered.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, Mark V. (1997).Health Benefits at Work: An Economic and Political Analysis of Employment-Based Health Insurance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, Uwe, Peter Hussey, and Gerald Anderson. “Cross-national Comparisons of Health Systems using OECD Data, 1999.”Health Affairs 21:3 (2002): 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, Gail.Consumer Choice of Health Insurance Plans and Providers. Testimony before Presidential Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the Healthcare Industry (June 25, 1997).

  • Summers, Lawrence H. “Some Simple Economics of Mandated Benefits.”American Economic Review 79 (1989): 177–183

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2004).Historical Health Insurance Tables. URL:www.census.gov/hhes/hlthins/histoic/hihisttl.html, accessed September 14, 2004.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Robert Kaestner, Ph.D. received his Ph.D. in economics from the City University of New York, and he is currently a professor in the Institute of Government and Public Affairs and the Department of Economics at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Dr. Kaestner is also a research associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research. Dr. Kaestner’s areas of research interest are health and labor economics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaestner, R. Consumer choice and employer-sponsored health insurance. Ageing Int. 31, 168–179 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-006-1011-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-006-1011-9

Keywords

Navigation