Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does Free Will Really Exist? The Motivational Congruence Theory’s Perspective

  • Research
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Free will plays a critical role in human motivation. Recent advances in science and technologies have had a significant impact on free will. They have raised serious concerns regarding the threatening effects of such advancements on perceived autonomy. However, there is still a longstanding debate on the existence of free will, known as the problem of free will. Philosophers have provided contrasting views regarding the existence of free will and its relationship with causal determination and mental causation problems. These problems are related to the underlying dualistic approach between mental and physical factors. Similar to the philosophy literature, the motivation literature is concerned with the problem of free will and its influence on motivation and performance. Cognitive evaluation and self-determination theories are the most renowned theories which assert the effect of autonomy (i.e., free will) on intrinsic motivation. However, these theories have mainly focused on the effect of the need for autonomy as an underlying driver of intrinsic motivation. They have not been able to address the fundamental question about the existence of actual free will and its effect on motivation and performance. This is mainly due to their dualistic approach in the form of intrinsic/extrinsic motivation dichotomization. Motivational congruence theory addresses the problem of free will and substantiates its effect by going beyond such a dualistic approach and resolving the related problems of mental causation and causal determination. The theory does this by taking a cotextualist and dialectical approach to the interaction between intrinsic and extrinsic motivational mechanisms and context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • André, Q., Carmon, Z., Wertenbroch, K., Crum, A., Frank, D., Goldstein, W., & Yang, H. (2018). Consumer choice and autonomy in the age of artificial intelligence and big data. Customer Needs and Solutions, 5(1–2), 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe, G. E. M. (1971). Causality and determination. In G. E. M. Anscombe (Ed.), The collected philosophical papers: Metaphysics and the philosophy of mind (pp. 133–147). (Vol. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Ayer, A. J. (1982). Freedom and necessity. In G. Watson (Ed.), Free will (Vol. 23, p. 15). Oxford University Press.

  • Batthyany, A. (2009). Mental causation and free will after Libet and soon: Reclaiming conscious agency. In A. Batthyany, A. C. Elitzur, & C. Avshalom (Eds.), Irreducibly conscious. Selected papers on consciousness. Universitätsverlag Winter.

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Monroe, A. E. (2014). Recent research on free will: Conceptualizations, beliefs, and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, S., & Wilson, J. (2016). Free will and mental quausation. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 2(2), 310–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet, J., Gunnell, K. E., Gaudreau, P., & Sabiston, C. M. (2015). An integrative analytical framework for understanding the effects of autonomous and controlled motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 84, 2–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucher, T., Collins, C., Rollo, M. E., McCaffrey, T. A., De Vlieger, N., Van der Bend, D., & Perez-Cueto, F. J. (2016). Nudging consumers towards healthier choices: A systematic review of positional influences on food choice. British Journal of Nutrition, 115(12), 2252–2263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clardy, J. L. (2012). Free Will, Alternative possibilities, and responsibility: An empirical investigation. Polymath: An Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences Journal, 2(2), 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B., & York, R. (2005). Dialectical nature. Monthly Review, 57(1), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. (1995). Indeterminism and control. American Philosophical Quarterly, 32, 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. (2010). Incompatibilist (nondeterministic) theories of free will. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incompatibilism-theories/.

  • Collinson, D. (2014). Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: New directions for critical leadership studies? Leadership, 10(1), 36–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cong-Lem, N. (2022). Vygotsky’s, Leontiev’s and Engeström’s cultural-historical (activity) theories: Overview, clarifications and implications. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 56(4), 1091–1112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 715–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Flaste, R. (1995). Why we do what we do: The dynamics of personal autonomy. GP Putnam’s Sons.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.

  • Descartes, R. (1996). Meditations on First Philosophy, John Cottingham, Tr. Cambridge University Press.

  • Donagan, A. (1987). Choice: The essential element in human action. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • Duus-Otterström, G. (2011). Freedom of will and the value of choice. Social Theory and Practice, 37(2), 256–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J. (1986). A primer on determinism. Reidel.

  • Ekstrom, L. W. (2012). Free will is not a mystery. In R. Kane (Ed.), Oxford handbook of free will (pp. 452–470). Oxford University Press.

  • Fagiano, M. (2022). The problem of free will. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 36(4), 436–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, H., Wan, X., Zheng, S., & Meng, L. (2020). The spillover effect of autonomy frustration on human motivation and its electrophysiological representation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 134–145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. (2004). Freedom and contextualism. In J. Campbell, M. O’Rourke, & D. Shier (Eds.), Topics in contemporary philosophy: Freedom and determinism (pp. 255–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Feldman, G. (2017). Making sense of agency: Belief in free will as a unique and important construct. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(1), e12293.

  • Frankfurt, H. (1969). Alternative possibilities and moral responsibility. Journal of Philosophy, 66(23), 829–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. (2018). Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. Moral responsibility and alternative possibilities (pp. 17–25). Routledge.

  • Galeazzi, P., & Rendsvig, R. K. (2022). On the foundations of the problem of free will. Episteme, 1–19.

  • Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2014). Pay for (individual) performance: Issues, claims, evidence and the role of sorting effects. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haji, I., & McKenna, M. (2004). Dialectical delicacies in the debate about freedom and alternative possibilities. The Journal of Philosophy, 101(6), 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne, J. (2001). Freedom in context. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 104(1), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendijani, R. (2021). Chapter four motivational mechanisms and their effect on managerial decision making. In M. Christofaro (Ed.), Emotion, cognition, and their marvellous interplay in managerial decision-making (pp. 65–92). Cambridge Publishing.

  • Hendijani, R. (2023). Mental Causation and Motivation: The motivational congruence theory’s perspective. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1–16.

  • Hendijani, R., & Steel, P. (2020). Motivational congruence effect: How reward salience and choice influence motivation and performance. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1791444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendijani, R., & Steel, P. (2022). Reward salience and choice in a Controlling Context: A lab experiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 862152.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hendijani, R., & Steel, P. (2023). Motivational congruence theory: Beyond the dualistic approach to human motivation. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1–16.

  • Hitchcock, C. R. (1996). Farewell to binary causation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 26(2), 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohwy, J. (2004). The experience of mental causation. Behavior and Philosophy, 32(2), 377–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, R., & Will, A. O. F. (2006). The act of choice. Michigan Publishing.

  • Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 349–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaster, R. (2020). Contextualizing free Will. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, 74(2), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeppsson, S. (2016). Non-elusive Freedom Contextualism. Philosophia, 44(3), 793–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R. (1996). The significance of free will. Oxford University Press.

  • Kane, R. (2012a). The Oxford handbook of free will. Oxford University Press.

  • Kane, R. (2012b). Rethinking free will: New perspectives on an ancient problem. In R. Kane (Ed.), Oxford handbook of free will (pp. 471–502). Oxford University Press.

  • Kim, J. (1993). Mental causation in a physical world. Philosophical Issues, 3, 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (1995). Mental causation: What? Me worry? Philosophical Issues, 6, 123–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (2007). Causation and Mental Causation. In J. Cohen, & B. P. McLaughlin (Eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of mind. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Koestner, R. (2008). Reaching one’s personal goals: A motivational perspective focused on autonomy. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(1), 60–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., Weibel, A., Dysvik, A., & Nerstad, C. G. (2017). Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes? Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 244–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavazza, A. (2022). Free Will and Autonomy in the age of Neurotechnologies. Protecting the mind: Challenges in Law, Neuroprotection, and neurorights (pp. 41–58). Springer International Publishing.

  • Legault, L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, 2416–2419.

  • Lehtivuori, A. (2023). When do extrinsic rewards undermine intrinsic motivation? A meta-analysis. (No. 978-951-29-9131-0) [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Turku]. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis.

  • Libet, B. (1999). Do we have free will? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(8–9), 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • List, C. (2014). Free will, determinism, and the possibility of doing otherwise. Noûs, 48(1), 156–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mammen, J. (2017). A New Logical Foundation for Psychology. Springer.

  • Maoz, U., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (Eds.). (2022). Free will: Philosophers and neuroscientists in conversation. Oxford University Press.

  • Marchiori, D. R., Adriaanse, M. A., & De Ridder, D. T. (2017). Unresolved questions in nudging research: Putting the psychology back in nudging. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(1), e12297.

  • Maslen, C. E. I., Horgan, T., & Daly, H. (2009). Mental Causation. In H. Beebee, C. Hitchcock, & P. Menzies (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Causation (pp. 460–485). Oxford University Press.

  • Menzies, P. (2003). The causal efficacy of mental states. In S. Walter, & H. D. Heckmann (Eds.), Physicalism and Mental Causation: The metaphysics of mind and action (pp. 195–224). Imprint Academic.

  • Menzies, P. (2007). Causation in context. In H. Price, & R. Corry (Eds.), Causation, physics and the Constitution of reality: Russell’s republic revisited (pp. 191–223). Oxford University Press.

  • Mironenko, I. A., & Sorokin, P. S. (2022). Activity theory for the de-structuralized modernity. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 56(4), 1055–1071.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. S., Grehl, M. M., Rutter, S. B., Mehta, M., & Westwater, M. L. (2022). On what motivates us: A detailed review of intrinsic v. extrinsic motivation. Psychological Medicine, 1–16.

  • Mudrik, L., & Maoz, U. (2015). Me & my brain: Exposing neuroscience’s closet dualism. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(2), 211–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D., & Lombrozo, T. (2017). Effects of manipulation on attributions of causation, free will, and moral responsibility. Cognitive Science, 41(2), 447–481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, T. (1995). Agents, causes, and events: Essays on indeterminism and free will. Oxford University Press.

  • O’Connor, T. (2000). Persons and causes: The metaphysics of free will. Oxford University Press.

  • O’Connor, T. (2001). In R. Kane (Ed.), Oxford handbook on free will (pp. 337–355). Oxford University Press.

  • Oliver, E. J., Markland, D., Hardy, J., & Petherick, C. M. (2008). The effects of autonomy-supportive versus controlling environments on self-talk. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 200–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patall, E. A. (2013). Constructing motivation through choice, interest, and interestingness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 522–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 270–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. R. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 896–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereboom, D. (2022). Free will. Cambridge University Press.

  • Ragland, C. P. (2016). The will to reason: Theodicy and freedom in descartes. Oxford University Press.

  • Reeve, J., Ryan, R., Deci, E. L., & Jang, H. (2012). Understanding and promoting autonomous self-regulation: A self-determination theory perspective. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning (pp. 223–244). Routledge.

  • Rieber, S. (2006). Free will and contextualism. Philosophical Studies, 129, 223–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. M. (2009). Cultural-historical activity theory: Toward a social psychology from first principles. History and Philosophy of Psychology Bulletin, 21(1), 8–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2022). Self-determination theory. In F. Maggino (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 1–7). Springer International Publishing.

  • Ryan, R. M., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2023). Self-determination theory: Metatheory, methods, and meaning. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The oxford handbook of self-determination theory. Oxford University Press.

  • Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Grolnick, W. S., & La Guardia, J. G. (2015). The significance of autonomy and autonomy support in psychological development and psychopathology. Developmental Psychopathology: Volume One: Theory and Method, 795–849.

  • Sartorio, C. (2016). Causation and free will. Oxford University Press.

  • Schmidt, A. T., & Engelen, B. (2020). The ethics of nudging: An overview. Philosophy Compass, 15(4), e12658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2021). Contrastive mental causation. Synthese, 198(Suppl 3), 861–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steward, H. (2015). What is Determinism?’. Flickers of Freedom blog. Available at: http://philosophycommons.typepad.com/flickers_of_freedom/2015/07/what-is-determinism.html.

  • Suárez, M. (2014). The contextual character of causal evidence. Topoi, 33, 397–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R. (2016). The ethics of influence: Government in the age of behavioral science. Cambridge University Press.

  • Swinburne, R. (2013). Mind, brain, and free will. Oxford University Press.

  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Pinguin.

  • Tierney, H. (2023). The future of the causal quest. A Companion to Free Will, 434–450.

  • van Miltenburg, N. (2022). Causality, determination and free will: Towards an anscombean account of free action. Synthese, 200(4), 279–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Miltenburg, N., & Ometto, D. (2020). Free will and mental powers. Topoi, 39(5), 1155–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 4: The history of the development of higher mental functions. Plenum Press.

  • Wegner, D. M., & Wheatley, T. (1999). Apparent mental causation: Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist, 54(7), 480–492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wertenbroch, K., Vosgerau, J., & Bruyneel, S. D. (2008). Free will, temptation, and self-control: We must believe in free will, we have no choice (Isaac B. Singer). Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(1), 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertenbroch, K., Schrift, R. Y., Alba, J. W., Barasch, A., Bhattacharjee, A., Giesler, M., & Zwebner, Y. (2020). Autonomy in consumer choice. Marketing Letters, 31, 429–439.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Widerker, D. (1995). Libertarianism and Frankfurt’s attack on the principle of alternative possibilities. The Philosophical Review, 104(2), 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willaschek, M. (2010). Non-relativist Contextualism about Free Will. European Journal of Philosophy, 18(4), 567–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1995). Making sense of humanity. Cambridge University Press.

  • Wilson, P. M., Sabiston, C. M., Mack, D. E., & Blanchard, C. M. (2012). On the nature and function of scoring protocols used in exercise motivation research: An empirical study of the behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(5), 614–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. D. (2022). Compatibilist libertarianism: Why it talks past the traditional free will problem and determinism is still a worry. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 8(4), 604–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yablo, S. (2003). Causal relevance. Philosophical Issues, 13, 316–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yablo, S. (2004). Sketch of an outline of a prototheory of causation. In J. Collins, N. Hall, & L. A. Paul (Eds.), Causation and counterfactuals (pp. 119–138). MIT.

Download references

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran Jalal-e-Al-e-Ahmad Hwy & Chamran Hwy, Al-e-Ahmad, Tehran, Iran

    Rosa Hendijani

Authors
  1. Rosa Hendijani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the work related to this paper, including its write-up and submission to the journal is done by Rosa Hendijani.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosa Hendijani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author has no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hendijani, R. Does Free Will Really Exist? The Motivational Congruence Theory’s Perspective. Integr. psych. behav. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-024-09822-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-024-09822-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation