Abstract
For many centuries, the issues of power, politics, and state have been widely discussed in scientific literature. Developing theories, philosophers proceeded from the side of hierarchical affiliation of power, which is confirmed in theological and biological concepts. Relevance of the presented article is conditioned by the fact that for the first time the French philosopher M. Foucault has offered innovative ideas of power concept from the social point of view. M. Foucault’s works are of significant importance for modern researchers in various branches of science since he created a universal tool for the study of social relations. The objective of this study entails conducting a thorough examination of the development of his theory, as well as exploring diverse perspectives presented by scholars on this matter. The result of the research was a full-fledged analysis of the “power” category from the position of a comprehensive phenomenon, which penetrates the whole structure of the state, and not only selected organs or institutions. The main conclusion of the paper is that “power” is a complex social phenomenon that cannot be equated with categories such as “law”, “discipline”, “subordination”, or “punishment”.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). The two faces of power. The American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952.
Balan, S. (2010). M. Foucault’s view on power relations. Cogito: Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2, 193.
Berndtson, A. (1970). The meaning of power. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 31(1), 73–84.
Bokareva, O. B. (2019). The concept of power and the concept of “Power-knowledge” in the philosophy of Michel Foucault. International Journal of the Humanities and Natural Sciences, 3(1), 172–175.
Carlsen, A., Clegg, S. R., Pitsis, T. S., & Mortensen, T. F. (2020). From ideas of power to the powering of ideas in organizations: Reflections from Follett and Foucault. European Management Journal, 38(6), 829–835.
Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2, 201–215.
Donzelot, J., & Gordon, C. (2008). Governing Liberal Societies – the Foucault Effect in the English-speaking World. Foucault Studies, 5, 48–62.
Dorovskikh, V. I. (2009). State-legal views of Michel Foucault. Rostov-on-Don. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institute of Higher Education “Rostov Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation”.
Duguit, L. (1907). Traite de droit constitutionnel. https://criminocorpus.org/fr/outils/bibliographie/consultation/ouvrages/77215/.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1979). Power, truth, strategy. Feral Publications.
Foucault, М. (1996). The will to truth: Beyond knowledge, power and sexuality. Kastal.
Foucault, M. (2019). Power: The essential works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984. Penguin Classics.
Foucault, M. (2020). Power/knowledge. The new social theory reader (pp. 73–79). Routledge.
Foucault, M., & Rabinow, P. (1984). The Foucault reader. Pantheon Books.
Gaventa, J. (2003). Power after Lukes: A review of the literature. Institute of Development Studies.
Häkli, J., & Ruez, D. (2020). Governmentality. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Second Edition), 259–265. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780081022955106511#.
Hegel, V. F. (1974). Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences. Mysl.
Isaev, I., Kornev, A., Lipen, S., & Zenin, S. (2020). The machine of power and aspects of political balance. Quaestio Rossica, 8(3), 979–992.
Johnson, M. N. P., & McLean, E. (2020). Discourse Analysis, 377–383. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780081022955108145#.
Ladkin, D., & Probert, J. (2021). From sovereign to subject: Applying Foucault’s conceptualization of power to leading and studying power within leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(4), 101310.
Lukes, S. (2021). Power: A radical view. Red Globe Press.
Marsel, M. (1982). L’autorite. Presses Universitaires de France.
Mezzadra, S. (2020). Class struggle, labor power, and the politics of the body. Marxian Threads in the work of Michel Foucault ZINBUN, 50, 57–69.
Mukhaev, R. T. (2023). Political Science. Urait.
Nozovtsev, D. B. (2015). The problem of power in the works of Michel Foucault. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series: Humanitarian and Social Sciences, 4, 49–57.
Paulson, S. L., & Paulson, B. L. (1998). Normativity and norms: Critical perspectives on kelsenian themes. Oxford University Press.
Rusakov, S. S. (2017). The evolution of strategies for analyzing power in the political philosophy of Michel Foucault. Saint Petersburg State University.
Sciortino, L. (2021). The emergence of objectivity: Fleck, Foucault, Kuhn and Hacking. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 88, 128–137.
Sumitro, S., Yuliadi, I., Kurniawansyah, E., Najamudin, N., & Umanailo, M. C. B. (2020). Reflection the Concept of Power Foucault’s. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Dubai, UAE. Southfield: IEOM Society International.
Volkov, V. N. (2012). Concept of disciplinary power in modern cultural discourse. Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University of Culture and Arts 19 – 2, 10–17.
Zekrist, R. I. (2012). Michel Foucault’s concept of power. Sciences, 2(103), 40–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kaldybekov, Y., Abdildin, Z., Kabul, O. et al. Problem of Power in Michel Foucault’s Philosophy. Integr. psych. behav. 58, 420–432 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-023-09804-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-023-09804-w