Skip to main content
Log in

Motivational Congruence Theory: Beyond the Dualistic Approach to Human Motivation

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dualism has long been part of human sciences, including psychology and its sub-discipline of motivation. In psychology, such dualism is reflected in the rationalism-empiricism dichotomy. This dichotomy has resulted in two seemingly contradictory perspectives, including empiricism and rationalism. From empiricism perspective, the primary contact between subject and object is the passive reception of inputs from the environment. From rationalism perspective, the primary contact is through the match between conceptual forms and empirical observations. Relying on the notion of “being-in-the-world”, activity theories reconcile these discrepancies by stressing the role of individual’s activity in the contact between individual and the world. Similarly, in the motivation literature, such duality is highlighted by the dissection of motivation into intrinsic and extrinsic categories. It has resulted in three contrasting streams on the relationship between extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. The first stream by reinforcement theories argues that these two motivational mechanisms act in an additive way. The second stream by undermining theories posits that they interact in a negative way. Yet, the third stream by contingency theories postulates that the simultaneous effect of these motivational mechanisms depends on reward salience. These theoretical streams either implicitly or explicitly give priority to one type of motivation over the other. Emphasizing a dialectical stance, motivational congruence theory gives equal weight to both types of motivation. It stipulates that the perceived congruence between motivational mechanisms and context determines overall motivation and performance. The theory goes beyond the dualistic approach in motivation and resolves discrepancies that have long afflicted the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amabile, T. M., DeJong, W., & Lepper, M. R. (1976). Effects of externally imposed deadlines on subsequent intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(1), 92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R., Manoogian, S. T., & Reznick, J. S. (1976). The undermining and enhancing of intrinsic motivation in preschool children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(5), 915–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao, X. (2005). Who makes the choice?: rethinking the roles of self-determination and relatedness in Chinese children’s motivation. HKU Theses Online (HKUTO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, L. A. (1990). Dialectical contradictions in relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(3), 489–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beus, J. M., & Whitman, D. S. (2017). Almighty dollar or root of all evil? Testing the effects of money on workplace behavior. Journal of Management, 43(7), 2147–2167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, E. E. (2012). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology. Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Breugst, N., Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. (2020). When is effort contagious in new venture management teams? Understanding the contingencies of social motivation theory. Journal of Management Studies, 57(8), 1556–1588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M., & Ardila, R. (1987). Why Philosophy of psychology? In Philosophy of Psychology (pp. 3–24). Springer.

  • Castro, J., & Lafuente, E. (2007). Westernalization in the mirror: On the cultural reception of western psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41(1), 106–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chatzisarantis, N. L., Hagger, M. S., Biddle, S. J., Smith, B., & Wang, J. C. (2003). A meta-analysis of perceived locus of causality in exercise, sport, and physical education contexts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25(3), 284–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chemolli, E., & Gagné, M. (2014). Evidence against the continuum structure underlying motivation measures derived from self-determination theory. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 575–585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B., & York, R. (2005). Dialectical nature. Monthly Review, 57(1), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, D. (2014). Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: New directions for critical leadership studies? Leadership, 10(1), 36–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corpus, J. H., & Wormington, S. V. (2014). Profiles of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations in elementary school: A longitudinal analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82(4), 480–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Charms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 580–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142.

  • Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The” what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow, S. C. (1990). Beyond dualism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(2), 143–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth? American Psychologist, 51, 1153–1166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., & Selbst, M. (1994). Does reward increase or decrease creativity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), 1116–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelsted, N. (2017). Catching up with Aristotle: A journey in quest of general psychology. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta Konsultit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working, and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Orienta-Konsultit Oy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enzle, M. E., & Ross, J. M. (1978). Increasing and decreasing intrinsic interest with contingent rewards: A test of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(6), 588–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrin, D. L., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust: Mediating processes and differential effects. Organization Science, 14(1), 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Jegen, R. (2001). Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(5), 589–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, I., & Urminsky, O. (2017). The dynamic effect of incentives on postreward task engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(1), 1–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. H. (1894). General introduction. In Nettleship R. L. (Ed.), Works (1 vol., pp. 1–299). Longmans, Green, and Co.

  • Hamner, W. C., & Foster, L. W. (1975). Are intrinsic and extrinsic rewards additive: A test of Deci’s cognitive evaluation theory of task motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 14(3), 398–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hendijani, R., & Steel, P. (2022). Reward salience and choice in a Controlling Context: A lab experiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 862152.

  • Hendijani, R. (2021). Chapter four motivational mechanisms and their effect on managerial decision making. In M. Christofaro (Ed.), Emotion, cognition, and their marvellous interplay in managerial decision-making (pp. 65–92). Cambridge Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendijani, R., Bischak, D. P., Arvai, J., & Dugar, S. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, external reward, and their effect on overall motivation and performance. Human Performance, 29(4), 251–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendijani, R., & Steel, P. (2020). Motivational congruence effect: How reward salience and choice influence motivation and performance. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1791444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewett, R., & Conway, N. (2016). The undermining effect revisited: The salience of everyday verbal rewards and self-determined motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(3), 436–455.

  • Hjørland, B. (2009). Concept theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1519–1536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K. (1973). Sinnliche erkenntnis—Historischer Ursprung und gesellschaftlicher Funktion der Wahrnehmung. Fischer Athenäum Taschenbuch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie. Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., & Morin, A. J. (2020). Putting the pieces together: Reviewing the structural conceptualization of motivation within SDT. Motivation and Emotion, 44(6), 846–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 349–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28(2), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Fishbach, Ayelet, Friedman, Ron, Chun, Woo Yung, & Sleeth-Keppler, David. (2002). A Theory of Goal Systems. In Mark P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 331–378). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., Weibel, A., Dysvik, A., & Nerstad, C. G. (2017). Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes? Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 244–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legault, L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 2416–2419). Springer International Publishing.

  • Leontiev, A. N. (1974). The problem of activity in psychology. Soviet Psychology, 13(2), 4–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A. N. (1982). Psychologie des Abbilds [Psychology of the perceptual image]. Forum Kritische Psychologie, 9, 5–9. (translated from a Russian manuscript, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. (1975). Turning play into work: Effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic rewards on children’s intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(3), 479–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. (1979). The hidden costs of reward: New perspectives on the psychology of human motivation. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1952). Group decision and social change. In G. E. Swanson, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 459–473). Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longworth, G. (2009). Rationalism and empiricism. Key Ideas in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, 67–74.

  • Mammen, J. (2008). What is a concept. Journal of Anthropological Psychology, 19(2), 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mammen, J. (2017). A New Logical Foundation for psychology. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mammen, J. (2021). Bridging: Some personal reflections. In B. Wagoner, B. A. Christensen, & C. Demuth (Eds.), Culture as process (pp. 389–398). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mammen, J., & Mironenko, I. (2015). Activity theories and the ontology of psychology: Learning from danish and russian experiences. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(4), 681–713.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manzo, S., & Calvente, S. (2020). Early modern empiricism. In Jalobeanu D., & Wolfe C. T. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of early modern philosophy and the sciences (pp. 1–13). Springer Nature.

  • Meyers, R. G. (2014). Understanding empiricism. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, N. W. (1997). Attention and implicit memory tests: The effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming. Memory & Cognition, 25(1), 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, N. W., & Hartman, M. (1996). Divided attention and indirect memory tests. Memory & Cognition, 24(4), 453–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M., Gagné, M., & Rosman, H. (2008). Helpful self-control: Autonomy support, vitality, and depletion. Journal of experimental social psychology, 44(3), 573–585.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, E. J., Markland, D., Hardy, J., & Petherick, C. M. (2008). The effects of autonomy-supportive versus controlling environments on self-talk. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 200–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, K. R., & Chapin, C. (2007). Relations of fundamental motives and psychological needs to well-being and intrinsic motivation. In P. Zelick (Ed.), Issues in the psychology of motivation (pp. 133–145). Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papineau, D. (2015). The nature of a priori intuitions: Analytic or synthetic? In Fischer E. , & Collins J. (Eds.), Experimental philosophy, rationalism, and naturalism (pp. 59–79). Routledge.

  • Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 270–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. R. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 896–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968). Management attitudes and performance. Richard D. Irwin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, J. J. (2005). The return of concept empiricism. In H. Cohen & C. Leferbvre (Eds.), Categorization and cognitive science (pp. 679–695). Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, L. L. (2015). Unpacking the dialectic: Alternative views on the discourse–materiality relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 706–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S. (2004). Multifaceted nature of intrinsic motivation: The theory of 16 basic desires. Review of general psychology, 8(3), 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S. (2005). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation at 30: Unresolved scientific issues. The Behavior Analyst, 28(1), 1–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S. (2008). The normal personality: A new way of thinking about people. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S. (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Teaching of Psychology, 39(2), 152–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D., & Brown, D. (2015). Idealism and materialism in perception. Perception, 44(4), 423–435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2008). Psychology as a social science. Subjectivity, 23, 1–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. (1975). Salience of reward and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M., Karniol, R., & Rothstein, M. (1976). Reward contingency and intrinsic motivation in children: A test of the delay of gratification hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(4), 442–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. M. (2009). Cultural-historical activity theory: Toward a social psychology from first principles. History and Philosophy of Psychology Bulletin, 21(1), 8–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, M., Putnam, L. L., & Bartunek, J. (2004). Dualities and tensions of planned organizational change. In M. S. Poole & A. H. Van de Ven (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation (pp. 73–107). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. E. (1975). The effects of anticipated vs. unanticipated social reward on subsequent intrinsic motivation. Unpublished dissertation. Cornell University.

  • Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (2003). Behavioral management and task performance in organizations: Conceptual background, meta-analysis, and test of alternative models. Personnel Psychology, 56(1), 155–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 249–288). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (2014). The minds of the moderns: Rationalism, empiricism and philosophy of mind. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thye, S. R. (2014). Logical and philosophical foundations of experimental research in the social sciences. In M. Webster Jr. & J. Sell (Eds.), Laboratory experiments in the social sciences (pp. 53–82). Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2017). A guided science: History of psychology in the mirror of its making. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vanzo, A. (2013). Kant on empiricism and rationalism. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 30(1), 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanzo, A. (2016). Empiricism and rationalism in nineteenth-century histories of philosophy. Journal of the History of Ideas, 77(2), 253–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. (1964). Motivation and work. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, K., & Fishbach, A. (2018). When intrinsic motivation and immediate rewards overlap. In C. E. Kopetz & A. Fishbach (Eds.), The motivation cognition interface (pp. 1–19). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, K., & Fishbach, A. (2018). It’s about time: Earlier rewards increase intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(6), 877–890.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, A. Z. (2008). Self-Knowledge: Rationalism vs. Empiricism. Philosophy Compass, 3(2), 325–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosa Hendijani.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The authors have developed a new theory in motivation referred to as “Motivational Congruence Theory.” The theory addresses the ongoing debate in the motivation literature regarding the effect of different types of rewards on motivation and performance. It takes a dialectical stance and bridges the gap between the major streams in the motivation literature, including theories in behavioral psychology and mainstream economics and self-determination and cognitive evaluation theories. The theory does that by highlighting the role of reward salience and introducing the notion of congruence among different motivational mechanisms. The current paper elaborates on the theoretical foundations of this theory.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hendijani, R., Steel, P. Motivational Congruence Theory: Beyond the Dualistic Approach to Human Motivation. Integr. psych. behav. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-023-09793-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-023-09793-w

Keywords

Navigation