Abstract
Dualism has long been part of human sciences, including psychology and its sub-discipline of motivation. In psychology, such dualism is reflected in the rationalism-empiricism dichotomy. This dichotomy has resulted in two seemingly contradictory perspectives, including empiricism and rationalism. From empiricism perspective, the primary contact between subject and object is the passive reception of inputs from the environment. From rationalism perspective, the primary contact is through the match between conceptual forms and empirical observations. Relying on the notion of “being-in-the-world”, activity theories reconcile these discrepancies by stressing the role of individual’s activity in the contact between individual and the world. Similarly, in the motivation literature, such duality is highlighted by the dissection of motivation into intrinsic and extrinsic categories. It has resulted in three contrasting streams on the relationship between extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. The first stream by reinforcement theories argues that these two motivational mechanisms act in an additive way. The second stream by undermining theories posits that they interact in a negative way. Yet, the third stream by contingency theories postulates that the simultaneous effect of these motivational mechanisms depends on reward salience. These theoretical streams either implicitly or explicitly give priority to one type of motivation over the other. Emphasizing a dialectical stance, motivational congruence theory gives equal weight to both types of motivation. It stipulates that the perceived congruence between motivational mechanisms and context determines overall motivation and performance. The theory goes beyond the dualistic approach in motivation and resolves discrepancies that have long afflicted the literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amabile, T. M., DeJong, W., & Lepper, M. R. (1976). Effects of externally imposed deadlines on subsequent intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(1), 92–98.
Anderson, R., Manoogian, S. T., & Reznick, J. S. (1976). The undermining and enhancing of intrinsic motivation in preschool children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(5), 915–922.
Bao, X. (2005). Who makes the choice?: rethinking the roles of self-determination and relatedness in Chinese children’s motivation. HKU Theses Online (HKUTO.
Baxter, L. A. (1990). Dialectical contradictions in relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 69–88.
Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. Guildford Press.
Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(3), 489–520.
Beus, J. M., & Whitman, D. S. (2017). Almighty dollar or root of all evil? Testing the effects of money on workplace behavior. Journal of Management, 43(7), 2147–2167.
Boesch, E. E. (2012). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology. Springer Science & Business Media.
Breugst, N., Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. (2020). When is effort contagious in new venture management teams? Understanding the contingencies of social motivation theory. Journal of Management Studies, 57(8), 1556–1588.
Bunge, M., & Ardila, R. (1987). Why Philosophy of psychology? In Philosophy of Psychology (pp. 3–24). Springer.
Castro, J., & Lafuente, E. (2007). Westernalization in the mirror: On the cultural reception of western psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41(1), 106–113.
Chatzisarantis, N. L., Hagger, M. S., Biddle, S. J., Smith, B., & Wang, J. C. (2003). A meta-analysis of perceived locus of causality in exercise, sport, and physical education contexts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25(3), 284–306.
Chemolli, E., & Gagné, M. (2014). Evidence against the continuum structure underlying motivation measures derived from self-determination theory. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 575–585.
Clark, B., & York, R. (2005). Dialectical nature. Monthly Review, 57(1), 13–22.
Collinson, D. (2014). Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: New directions for critical leadership studies? Leadership, 10(1), 36–55.
Corpus, J. H., & Wormington, S. V. (2014). Profiles of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations in elementary school: A longitudinal analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82(4), 480–501.
De Charms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. Academic Press.
Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 580–590.
Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The” what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185.
Dow, S. C. (1990). Beyond dualism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(2), 143–157.
Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth? American Psychologist, 51, 1153–1166.
Eisenberger, R., & Selbst, M. (1994). Does reward increase or decrease creativity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), 1116–1127.
Engelsted, N. (2017). Catching up with Aristotle: A journey in quest of general psychology. Springer.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working, and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
Enzle, M. E., & Ross, J. M. (1978). Increasing and decreasing intrinsic interest with contingent rewards: A test of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(6), 588–597.
Ferrin, D. L., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust: Mediating processes and differential effects. Organization Science, 14(1), 18–31.
Frey, B. S., & Jegen, R. (2001). Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(5), 589–611.
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.
Goswami, I., & Urminsky, O. (2017). The dynamic effect of incentives on postreward task engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(1), 1–19.
Green, T. H. (1894). General introduction. In Nettleship R. L. (Ed.), Works (1 vol., pp. 1–299). Longmans, Green, and Co.
Hamner, W. C., & Foster, L. W. (1975). Are intrinsic and extrinsic rewards additive: A test of Deci’s cognitive evaluation theory of task motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 14(3), 398–415.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hendijani, R., & Steel, P. (2022). Reward salience and choice in a Controlling Context: A lab experiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 862152.
Hendijani, R. (2021). Chapter four motivational mechanisms and their effect on managerial decision making. In M. Christofaro (Ed.), Emotion, cognition, and their marvellous interplay in managerial decision-making (pp. 65–92). Cambridge Publishing.
Hendijani, R., Bischak, D. P., Arvai, J., & Dugar, S. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, external reward, and their effect on overall motivation and performance. Human Performance, 29(4), 251–274.
Hendijani, R., & Steel, P. (2020). Motivational congruence effect: How reward salience and choice influence motivation and performance. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1791444.
Hewett, R., & Conway, N. (2016). The undermining effect revisited: The salience of everyday verbal rewards and self-determined motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(3), 436–455.
Hjørland, B. (2009). Concept theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1519–1536.
Holzkamp, K. (1973). Sinnliche erkenntnis—Historischer Ursprung und gesellschaftlicher Funktion der Wahrnehmung. Fischer Athenäum Taschenbuch Verlag.
Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie. Campus Verlag.
Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., & Morin, A. J. (2020). Putting the pieces together: Reviewing the structural conceptualization of motivation within SDT. Motivation and Emotion, 44(6), 846–861.
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 349–366.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28(2), 107–128.
Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Fishbach, Ayelet, Friedman, Ron, Chun, Woo Yung, & Sleeth-Keppler, David. (2002). A Theory of Goal Systems. In Mark P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 331–378). Academic Press.
Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., Weibel, A., Dysvik, A., & Nerstad, C. G. (2017). Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes? Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 244–258.
Legault, L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 2416–2419). Springer International Publishing.
Leontiev, A. N. (1974). The problem of activity in psychology. Soviet Psychology, 13(2), 4–33.
Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall.
Leontiev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Progress Publishers.
Leontiev, A. N. (1982). Psychologie des Abbilds [Psychology of the perceptual image]. Forum Kritische Psychologie, 9, 5–9. (translated from a Russian manuscript, 1975).
Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. (1975). Turning play into work: Effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic rewards on children’s intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(3), 479–486.
Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. (1979). The hidden costs of reward: New perspectives on the psychology of human motivation. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129–137.
Lewin, K. (1952). Group decision and social change. In G. E. Swanson, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 459–473). Holt.
Longworth, G. (2009). Rationalism and empiricism. Key Ideas in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, 67–74.
Mammen, J. (2008). What is a concept. Journal of Anthropological Psychology, 19(2), 5–27.
Mammen, J. (2017). A New Logical Foundation for psychology. Springer.
Mammen, J. (2021). Bridging: Some personal reflections. In B. Wagoner, B. A. Christensen, & C. Demuth (Eds.), Culture as process (pp. 389–398). Springer.
Mammen, J., & Mironenko, I. (2015). Activity theories and the ontology of psychology: Learning from danish and russian experiences. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(4), 681–713.
Manzo, S., & Calvente, S. (2020). Early modern empiricism. In Jalobeanu D., & Wolfe C. T. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of early modern philosophy and the sciences (pp. 1–13). Springer Nature.
Meyers, R. G. (2014). Understanding empiricism. Routledge.
Mulligan, N. W. (1997). Attention and implicit memory tests: The effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming. Memory & Cognition, 25(1), 11–17.
Mulligan, N. W., & Hartman, M. (1996). Divided attention and indirect memory tests. Memory & Cognition, 24(4), 453–465.
Muraven, M., Gagné, M., & Rosman, H. (2008). Helpful self-control: Autonomy support, vitality, and depletion. Journal of experimental social psychology, 44(3), 573–585.
Oliver, E. J., Markland, D., Hardy, J., & Petherick, C. M. (2008). The effects of autonomy-supportive versus controlling environments on self-talk. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 200–212.
Olson, K. R., & Chapin, C. (2007). Relations of fundamental motives and psychological needs to well-being and intrinsic motivation. In P. Zelick (Ed.), Issues in the psychology of motivation (pp. 133–145). Nova Science.
Papineau, D. (2015). The nature of a priori intuitions: Analytic or synthetic? In Fischer E. , & Collins J. (Eds.), Experimental philosophy, rationalism, and naturalism (pp. 59–79). Routledge.
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 270–300.
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. R. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 896–915.
Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968). Management attitudes and performance. Richard D. Irwin Company.
Prinz, J. J. (2005). The return of concept empiricism. In H. Cohen & C. Leferbvre (Eds.), Categorization and cognitive science (pp. 679–695). Elsevier.
Putnam, L. L. (2015). Unpacking the dialectic: Alternative views on the discourse–materiality relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 706–716.
Reiss, S. (2004). Multifaceted nature of intrinsic motivation: The theory of 16 basic desires. Review of general psychology, 8(3), 179–193.
Reiss, S. (2005). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation at 30: Unresolved scientific issues. The Behavior Analyst, 28(1), 1–14.
Reiss, S. (2008). The normal personality: A new way of thinking about people. Cambridge University Press.
Reiss, S. (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Teaching of Psychology, 39(2), 152–156.
Rose, D., & Brown, D. (2015). Idealism and materialism in perception. Perception, 44(4), 423–435.
Rose, N. (2008). Psychology as a social science. Subjectivity, 23, 1–1.
Ross, M. (1975). Salience of reward and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 245–254.
Ross, M., Karniol, R., & Rothstein, M. (1976). Reward contingency and intrinsic motivation in children: A test of the delay of gratification hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(4), 442–447.
Roth, W. M. (2009). Cultural-historical activity theory: Toward a social psychology from first principles. History and Philosophy of Psychology Bulletin, 21(1), 8–22.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.
Seo, M., Putnam, L. L., & Bartunek, J. (2004). Dualities and tensions of planned organizational change. In M. S. Poole & A. H. Van de Ven (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation (pp. 73–107). Oxford University Press.
Smith, W. E. (1975). The effects of anticipated vs. unanticipated social reward on subsequent intrinsic motivation. Unpublished dissertation. Cornell University.
Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (2003). Behavioral management and task performance in organizations: Conceptual background, meta-analysis, and test of alternative models. Personnel Psychology, 56(1), 155–194.
Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 249–288). Academic Press.
Thomas, J. (2014). The minds of the moderns: Rationalism, empiricism and philosophy of mind. Routledge.
Thye, S. R. (2014). Logical and philosophical foundations of experimental research in the social sciences. In M. Webster Jr. & J. Sell (Eds.), Laboratory experiments in the social sciences (pp. 53–82). Academic Press.
Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. Sage.
Valsiner, J. (2017). A guided science: History of psychology in the mirror of its making. Routledge.
Vanzo, A. (2013). Kant on empiricism and rationalism. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 30(1), 53–74.
Vanzo, A. (2016). Empiricism and rationalism in nineteenth-century histories of philosophy. Journal of the History of Ideas, 77(2), 253–282.
Vroom, V. (1964). Motivation and work. Wiley.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Woolley, K., & Fishbach, A. (2018). When intrinsic motivation and immediate rewards overlap. In C. E. Kopetz & A. Fishbach (Eds.), The motivation cognition interface (pp. 1–19). Routledge.
Woolley, K., & Fishbach, A. (2018). It’s about time: Earlier rewards increase intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(6), 877–890.
Zimmerman, A. Z. (2008). Self-Knowledge: Rationalism vs. Empiricism. Philosophy Compass, 3(2), 325–352.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The authors have developed a new theory in motivation referred to as “Motivational Congruence Theory.” The theory addresses the ongoing debate in the motivation literature regarding the effect of different types of rewards on motivation and performance. It takes a dialectical stance and bridges the gap between the major streams in the motivation literature, including theories in behavioral psychology and mainstream economics and self-determination and cognitive evaluation theories. The theory does that by highlighting the role of reward salience and introducing the notion of congruence among different motivational mechanisms. The current paper elaborates on the theoretical foundations of this theory.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hendijani, R., Steel, P. Motivational Congruence Theory: Beyond the Dualistic Approach to Human Motivation. Integr. psych. behav. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-023-09793-w
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-023-09793-w