Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Explicating Evolutionary Epistemological Concerns on Gossip and Cyberbullying

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gossip and bullying have psychosocial concerns and are usually considered as vice, bad, hence, non-virtuous. This paper deals with a plausible modest account for them to be considered not as bad, rather significant behavioral and epistemic tools from evolutionary and epistemological points of view. It adheres to a relationship between gossip and bullying in real (sociobiological-psychological domains) and within cyberspaces. Considering the formation of social relations and orders in reality and virtual platforms, it attempts to understand the issues and advantages gossip poses to societies from a reputational perspective. While evolutionary explanations of complex social behavior are not only difficult, but controversial too, this paper aims to present an evolutionary epistemological perspective to the act of gossiping, to understand the vantage it may have or provide. Usually, gossip and bullying are considered as having a negative connotation, but these are explicated as epistemic access tools for regulation, social order, knowledge gain, and niche construction. Consequently, gossip is showcased as an evolutionary epistemic achievement and virtuous enough to deal with the partly unknown features of the World.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adkins, K. (2017). Gossip, epistemology and power (11 vol., p. 6330). Gewerbestrasse: Springer International Publishing AG.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alfano, M., & Robinson, B. (2017). Gossip as a burdened virtue. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 20(3), 473–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedikt, M. (Ed.). (1991). Cyberspace: First steps. Mit Press.

  • Bertolotti, T. (2015). Niche Construction through Gossip and Mobbing: The mediation of violence in Technocognitive Niches. Patterns of rationality. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics (19 vol.). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17786-1_8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bertolotti, T., & Magnani, L. (2013). A philosophical and evolutionary approach to cyber-bullying: Social networks and the disruption of sub-moralities. Ethics and Information Technology, 15(4), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-013-9324-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertolotti, T., & Magnani, L. (2014). An epistemological analysis of gossip and gossip-based knowledge. Synthese, 191(17), 4037–4067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0514-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cieciura, J. (2016). A Summary of the Bystander Effect: Historical Development and Relevance in the Digital Age. [online] Inquiries Journal. Available at: http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1493/a-summary-of-the-bystander-effect-historical-development-and-relevance-in-the-digital-age>].

  • Colson, E. (1953). Social Control and Vengeance in Plateau Tonga Society1. Africa, 23(3), 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conein, B. (2011). Gossip, conversation and group size: Language as a bonding mechanism. Irish Journal of Sociology, 19(1), 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of personality and social psychology, 8(4p1), 377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • deLara, E. W. (2008). Developing a philosophy about bullying and sexual harassment: Cognitive coping strategies among high school students. Journal of School Violence, 7(4), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220801973862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2007). Rumor, gossip and urban legends. Diogenes, 54(1), 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper LaSalle (p. 111). The Library of Living Philosophers, Open Court Publishing.

  • Darwin, C. (1888). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex (Vol. 1). Murray.

  • Dunbar, R. (1996). Gossip, grooming and the evolution of language. Cambridge: Harvard UP.

  • Dunbar, R. I. (1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and brain sciences, 16(4), 681–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I., & Sharman, M. (1984). Is social grooming altruistic? Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 64(2), 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I., Marriott, A., & Duncan, N. D. (1997). Human conversational behavior. Human nature, 8(3), 231–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emler, N. (1994). Gossip, reputation, and social adaptation. In R. F. Goodman, & A. Ben-Ze (Eds.), (Eds.), Good gossip (pp. 117–138). University Press of Kansas. ‘ev.

  • Espelage, D. L., RAO, I. A., & Craven, R. G. (2012). Theories of cyberbullying. Principles of cyberbullying research (pp. 77–95). Routledge.

  • Eleanor, W. J. E., & Katz, J. E. (1997). Hyperbole over cyberspace: Self-presentation and social boundaries in Internet home pages and discourse. The Information Society, 13(4), 297–327.

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giardini, F., & Conte, R. (2012). Gossip for social control in natural and artificial societies. Simulation, 88(1), 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G. (2006). Bullying as a social process: The role of group membership in students’ perception of inter-group aggression at school. Journal of School Psychology, 44(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman, M. (1963). Papers in honor of Melville J. Herskovits: Gossip and scandal. Current anthropology, 4(3), 307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herskovits, M. J. (1937). Life in a Haitian Valley. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herskovits, M. J., Herskovits, F. S., & Castillo, G. B. (1947). Trinidad village.Revista Mexicana de Sociologia,293–296.

  • Hubálek, M. (2021). A brief (hi) story of just-so stories in evolutionary science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 51(5), 447–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, J. M. (2002). Historical evidence and human adaptations. Philosophy of science, 69(S3), S294–S304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, C. C. (2013). Rumors and gossip as forms of bullying: Sticks and stones? Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 33(2), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2013.764697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kniffin, K. M., & Wilson, D. S. (2010). Evolutionary perspectives on workplace gossip: Why and how gossip can serve groups. Group and Organization Management, 35(2), 150–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601109360390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kofoed, J., & Ringrose, J. (2012). Travelling and sticky affects: Exploring teens and sexualized cyberbullying through a butlerian-deleuzian-guattarian lens. Discourse, 33(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2012.632157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J., Mody-Desbareau, A., & Arluke, A. (1988). The gossip tabloid as agent of social control. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 65(2), 514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machackov, H., Dedkova, L., & Mezulanikova, K. (2015). Brief report: The bystander effect in cyberbullying incidents. Journal of Adolescence, 43, 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.05.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, S. (2021). Making sense of the relationship between adaptive thinking and Heuristics in Evolutionary psychology. Biological Theory, 16(1), 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megan Paull; Maryam Omari; Peter Standen (2012). When is a bystander not a bystander? A typology of the roles of bystanders in workplace bullying., 50(3),0–0. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7941.2012.00027.x

  • Noon, M., & Delbridge, R. (1993). News from behind my hand: Gossip in organizations. Organization studies, 14(1), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, S., & Notar, C. (2013). Bystanders are Key to Stopping Bullying. University Journal of Research and Education, [online] Available at: <https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1053992.pdf.

  • Paine, R. (1967). What is gossip about? An alternative hypothesis. Man, 2(2), 278–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the Schoolyard: A preliminary look at Cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006286288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Clarendon Press.

  • Popper, K. R. (1987). Evolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge. Open Court Publishing.

  • Radin, P. (1927). Primitive man as philosopher. New York and London, D: Appleton & to.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskauskas, J. (2007). Text-bullying among early adolescents. Kairaranga, 8(1), 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riva, G., & Galimberti, C. (1997). The psychology of cyberspace: A socio-cognitive framework to computer-mediated communication. New Ideas in Psychology, 15(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-118X(97)00015-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, I., & Soutter, A. (1996). From the SAGE Social Science Collections. Rights reserved. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 503(1), 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W. D. (1930). The right and the good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalise-sugiyama, M. (2016). Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6.

  • Smith, S. E. (2020). Is evolutionary psychology possible? Biological Theory, 15(1), 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H. J., Semmann, D., & Milinski, M. (2007). Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 104(44), 17435–17440.

  • Song, J., & Oh, I. (2018). Factors influencing bystanders’ behavioral reactions in cyberbullying situations. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. E. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London, UK. Academic Press.

  • Talamo, A., & Ligorio, B. (2001). Strategic identities in cyberspace. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 4(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1089/10949310151088479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. M. (2005). Gossip as an interpersonal communication phenomenon. West Virginia University.

  • Van Niekerk, J. (2008). The virtue of gossip. South African Journal of Philosophy, 27(4), 400–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volk, A. A., Camilleri, J. A., Dane, A. V., & Marini, Z. A. (2012). Is adolescent bullying an evolutionary adaptation? Aggressive behavior, 38(3), 222–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F. Y. (2016). Control 5.0: From Newton to Merton in popper’s cyber-social-physical spaces. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 3(3), 233–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wert, S. R., & Salovey, P. (2004). A social comparison account of gossip. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 122–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S., & Sober, E. (1998). Multilevel selection and the return of group-level functionalism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(2), 305–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. J. (1974). Filcher of good names: An enquiry into anrhropology and gossip. Man, 9(1), 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, R., Tully, M., & Ramirez, M. (2017). School administrator perceptions of Cyberbullying Facilitators and Barriers to preventive action: A qualitative study. Health Education and Behavior, 44(3), 476–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198116673814.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Abhramika Choudhuri and Lalit Saraswat contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Abhramika Choudhuri

  2. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India

    Lalit Saraswat

Authors
  1. Abhramika Choudhuri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lalit Saraswat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lalit Saraswat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Dataset: Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choudhuri, A., Saraswat, L. Explicating Evolutionary Epistemological Concerns on Gossip and Cyberbullying. Integr. psych. behav. 57, 1331–1353 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-023-09764-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-023-09764-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation