Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Nonlinear Dynamic Approach of the Notion of Interaction

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although it is not so obvious reading many of the interactionist works, interactionist theories can be tightly linked with a nonlinear dynamic approach of the psychological and social processes. The mathematical theory of dynamic systems (DST) could offer a more systematic conceptual and methodological outlook over the notion of interaction. From a DST perspective, interaction may be conceived as an interdependent continuous evolution in time of two or more dynamic variables, which are paradoxically simultaneously separated (as independent sources of variation), and undistinguishable, being united in a new, emergent, source of variation. This conception differs from the popular conception of the interaction as a succession of action and reaction. The key notion that, from a dynamic systems perspective, is linked with interaction is that of coupling, which is rarely used in the interactionist works. Future studies should specify the link between the dynamic approach of interaction and action theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Notes

  1. English translation: Interactions are actions that reciprocally modify the behaviour, or the nature of the elements, bodies, objects, phenomena that are present or influenced (alternative translation: Interactions are reciprocal actions that modify the behaviour or the nature of the elements, bodies, objects, phenomena that are present or influenced).

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to action: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, R. D. (1995). A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction. Artificial Intelligence, 72(1–2), 173–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boster, F. J., Shaw, A. Z., Carpenter, C. J., & Massi Lindsey, L. L. (2014). Simulation of a dynamic theory of reasoned action. Simulation & Gaming, 45(6), 699–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calzolari, F., & Tonella, P. (1998). Modeling client/server interactions by means of dynamic systems. In Proceedings. 24th EUROMICRO Conference (Cat. No. 98EX204) (Vol. 2, pp. 499–505). IEEE.

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002). Control processes and self-organization as complementary principles underlying behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(4), 304–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press.

  • Coey, C. A., Varlet, M., & Richardson, M. J. (2012). Coordination dynamics in a socially situated nervous system. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 164–176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R., Fusaroli, R., Duran, N. D., & Richardson, D. C. (2013). The self-organization of human interaction. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 59, pp. 43–95). Elsevier, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jaegher, H. (2009). Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(2), 535–542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 441–447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frezza, G. (2011). The concept of interaction: crossovers among biology, logic and philosophy. PhD thesis, Università degli Studi Roma Tre and Université Denis-Diderot, Paris VII A. A.

  • Froese, T., & Fuchs, T. (2012). The extended body: A case study in the neurophenomenology of social interaction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 205–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froese, T., & Gallagher, S. (2012). Getting interaction theory (IT) together: Integrating developmental, phenomenological, enactive, and dynamical approaches to social interaction. Interaction Studies, 13(3), 436–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossen, M. (2010). Interaction analysis and psychology: A dialogical perspective. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44(1), 1–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. (2021). The micro-genesis of interpersonal synergy. Insights from improvised dance duets. Ecological Psychology, 33(2), 106–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. P., Faria, J., Sumpter, D. J., & Krause, J. (2013). The dynamics of audience applause. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10(85), 20130466.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, J. (2020). Doing things together: A theory of skillful joint action (Vol. 41). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mortuja, M. G., Chaube, M. K., & Kumar, S. (2021). Dynamic analysis of a predator-prey system with nonlinear prey harvesting and square root functional response. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 148, 111071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Brechet, Y., Vicsek, T., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000). Self-organizing processes: The sound of many hands clapping. Nature, 403, 849–850.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Néda, Z., Nikitin, A., & Vicsek, T. (2003). Synchronization of two-mode stochastic oscillators: A new model for rhythmic applause and much more. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 321(1–2), 238–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palermos, S. O. (2014). Loops, constitution, and cognitive extension. Cognitive Systems Research, 27, 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palermos, S. O. (2016). The dynamics of group cognition. Minds and Machines, 26(4), 409–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palermos, S. O., & Tollefsen, D. P. (2018). Group know-how. In J. A. Carter, A. Clark, J. Kallestrup, S. O. Palermos, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Socially extended epistemology (pp. 112–131). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pronovost, S. (2006). Of computations and dynamic systems - An overview of the dynamicist controversy in cognitive science, Carleton University Cognitive Science Technical Report 2006–05. Accessed at http://www.carleton.ca/iis/TechReports, in 09.04.2005.

  • Przyrembel, M., Smallwood, J., Pauen, M., & Singer, T. (2012). Illuminating the dark matter of social neuroscience: Considering the problem of social interaction from philosophical, psychological, and neuroscientific perspectives. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasband, S. N. (2015). Chaotic dynamics of nonlinear systems. Courier Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schippers, M. B., Roebroeck, A., Renken, R., Nanetti, L., & Keysers, C. (2010). Mapping the information flow from one brain to another during gestural communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(20), 9388–9393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schönherr, J., & Westra, E. (2019). Beyond ‘interaction’: How to understand social effects on social cognition. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70(1), 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skoranski, A., Coatsworth, J. D., & Lunkenheimer, E. (2019). A dynamic systems approach to understanding mindfulness in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(10), 2659–2672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, R., & Gifford, R. (2019). Causality in the theory of planned behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(6), 920–933.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thonhauser, G., & Weichold, M. (2021). Approaching collectivity collectively: A multi-disciplinary account of collective action. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Geert, P. L. C. (2019). Dynamic systems, process and development. Human Development, 63, 153–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelder, T. J. (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 615–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vesper, C., Butterfill, S., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks, 23(8–9), 998–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department for Research in Social and Human Sciences, Psychology Research Group, Romanian Academy, Cluj-Napoca Branch, M. Kogalniceanu str. 8, 400084, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

    Lucia-Elisabeta Faiciuc

Authors
  1. Lucia-Elisabeta Faiciuc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucia-Elisabeta Faiciuc.

Ethics declarations

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

As a theoretical work, no participants were involved.

Competing Interests

The author has no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faiciuc, LE. A Nonlinear Dynamic Approach of the Notion of Interaction. Integr. psych. behav. 57, 758–775 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09740-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09740-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation