Skip to main content

Collective Memory: Metaphor or Real?

Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

Collective memory researchers predominantly in the cultural and social sciences have commonly understood the concept of collective memory as a mere metaphor, as something not existing in itself as memory but useful only as a tool for referring to the way groups construct shared representations of their past. Few have however addressed the question of whether it is a metaphor or literal in its own right. This paper looks at the plausibility of the claim that collective memory is a mere metaphor by probing its presuppositions, where the representationalist theory of mind emerges as the ground for such a claim. Then appealing to the externalist model of the mind championed in recent studies of mind in disciplines as varied as philosophy, cognitive science, evolutionary biology, and collective intentionality studies, we try to expose the presuppositions of that claim, opening up possibilities for conceiving collective memory as not merely metaphorical but literal and naturally existing as memory.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. Throughout the paper I have used the terms “real” and “literal” synonymously. To be clear, by asking if collective memory is “real”, I am not questioning the realness of the concept collective memory. A concept can be considered real regardless of whether it is socially constructed or grounded naturally. We are here concerned with the basis of the concept – whether it is referring literally to the cognitive domain of memory or whether to something else but memory. If it refers to the cognitive domain of memory, collective memory would exist sui generis as a certain kind of memory, and this is the meaning of real (or literal) presented here. If on the other hand it is not referring to the actual cognitive domain of memory but has conventionally been constructed (using individual memory as analogy) as an instrument to help us understand or deal (as scientists or otherwise) with the collective past, then we are considering it as not real but only a metaphor.

References

  • Anastasio, T. J., Ehrenberger, K. A., Watson, P., & Zhang, W. (2012). Individual and Collective Memory Consolidation. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L. (2012). Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge. Springer Science & Business Media. (Original work published in 1999).

  • Bartlett, S. F. C. (1995). Remembering. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1932).

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. Richardson (Ed), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood. (Original work published in 1983).

  • Boyer, P. (2009). What Are Memories For? Functions of Recall in Cognition and Culture. In P. Boyer & J. Wertsch (Eds.), Memory in Mind and Culture (pp. 3–28). Cambridge University Press.

  • Boyer, P., & Wertsch, J. V. (2009). Memory in Mind and Culture. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carretero, M., & van Alphen, F. (2018). History, Collective Memories, or National Memories? How the Representation of the Past is Framed by Master Narratives. In B. Wagoner (Ed.), Handbook of Culture and Memory (pp. 283–303). Oxford University Press.

  • Carter, J. A., Kallestrup, J., Palermos, S. O., & Pritchard, D. (2014). Varieties of Externalism. Philosophical. Issues, 1, 63–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 1, 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, F. E. (1905). Research Methods in Ecology. The University Publishing Company.

  • Clements, F. E. (1916). Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Carnegie Institution of Washington.

  • Confino, A. (1997). Collective Memory and Cultural History: Problems of Method. The American Historical Review, 5, 1386–1403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connerton, P. (1989). How Societies Remember. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2007). Participatory Sense-making: An Enactive Approach to Social Cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detrain, C., Deneubourg, J. L., & Pasteels, J. M. (1999). Information Processing in Social Insects. Birkhäuser.

  • Di Paolo, E. A., Cuffari, E. C., & De Jaegher, H. (2018). Linguistic Bodies: The Continuity Between Life and Language. MIT Press.

  • Di Paolo, E., Buhrmann, T., & Barandiaran, X. (2017). Sensorimotor Life: An Enactive Proposal. Oxford University Press.

  • Douglas, M. (1986). How Institutions Think. Syracuse University Press.

  • Durkheim, E. (2014). The Rules of Sociological Method (S. Lukes, Ed.). Simon and Schuster. (Original work published in 1895)

  • Eich, E. (1989). Theoretical Issues in State Dependent Memory. In H. L. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 331–354). Psychology Press.

  • Erll, A. (2008). Cultural Memory Studies: An Introduction. In A. Erll, A. Nünning, & S. B. Young, Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook (pp. 1–15). De Gruyter.

  • Erll, A. (2011). Memory in Culture. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fessler, D. M. T., & Machery, E. (2012). Culture and Cognition. In E. Margolis, R. Samuels, & S. P. Stich (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science (pp. 503–528). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flor, N., & Hutchins, E. (1991). Analyzing Distributed Cognition in Software Teams: A Case Study of Team Programming During Perfective Software Maintenance. In J. Koenemann-Belliveau, T. G. Moher, & S. P. Robertson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programmers (pp. 36–59). Intellect Books.

  • Fodor, J. A. (1975). The Language of Thought. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, T. (2017). Collective Body Memories. In C. Durt, T. Fuchs, & C. Tewes (Eds.), Embodiment, Enaction, and Culture (pp. 333–352). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2013). The Socially Extended Mind. Cognitive Systems Research, 4–12.

  • Gavriely-Nuri, D. (2013). Collective Memory as a Metaphor: The Case of Speeches by Israeli Prime Ministers 2001–2009. Memory Studies, 1, 46–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennaro, R. J. (2018). Introduction. In R. J. Gennaro (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Consciousness (pp. 1–8). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. (1989). On Social Facts. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, M. (1980). The Collective Memory (F. J. J. Ditter & V. Y. Ditter, Trans.). HarperCollins Publishers. (Original work published in 1950).

  • Halbwachs, M. (1992). Social Frameworks of Memory. In L. Coser (Trans.), On Collective Memory. University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1925).

  • Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The Emerging Conceptualization of Groups As Information Processors. Psychological Bulletin, 1, 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, B. (2013). Macrocognition: A Theory of Distributed Minds and Collective Intentionality (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing Enactivism. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J. R., & Christensen, C. (1993). Groups as Problem-Solving Units: Toward a New Meaning of Social Cognition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bon, G. (2007). The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. Gardners Books. (Original work published in 1895).

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Shambhala Publications.

  • Michaelian, K., & Sutton, J. (2013). Distributed Cognition and Memory Research: History and Current Directions. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelian, K., & Sutton, J. (2017a). Collective Memory. In M. Jankovic & K. Ludwig (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Collective Intentionality (pp. 140–151). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelian, K., & Sutton, J. (2017b). Collective Mental Time Travel: Remembering the Past and Imagining the Future Together. Synthese, 12, 4933–4960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newen, A., De Bruin, L. and Gallagher, S. eds. (2018). The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition. Oxford University Press.

  • Novick, P. (2007). Comments on Aleida Assmann’s Lecture: Comment Delivered at the Twentieth Annual Lecture of the GHI, November 16. (2006). Bulletin of the German Historical Institute. Spring, 40, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olick, J. K. (1999). Collective Memory: The Two Cultures. Sociological Theory, 3, 333–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, History. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, M. J. (2010). The New Science of the Mind. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, M., Lau, J., & Deutsch, M. (2020). Externalism about the Mind. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/content-externalism

  • Rupert, R. (2005). Minding One’s Cognitive Systems: When Does a Group of Minds Constitute a Single Cognitive Unit?”. Episteme, 1(3), 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandelands, L., & Stablein, R. E. (1987). The Concept of Organization Mind. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (pp. 135–161). JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, F. (2004). Socializing Metaphysics. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

  • Seeley, T. D. (1995). The Wisdom of the Hive: The Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies. Harvard University Press.

  • Sutton, J. (2006a). Introduction: Memory, Embodied Cognition, and the Extended Mind. Philosophical Psychology, 3, 281–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. (2006b). Distributed Cognition: Domains and Dimensions. Pragmatics & Cognition, 14(2), 235–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. (2008). Between Individual and Collective Memory: Coordination, Interaction, Distribution. Social Research, 75(1), 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theiner, G. (2013). Transactive Memory Systems: A Mechanistic Analysis of Emergent Group Memory. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 65–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theiner, G. (2014). A Beginner’s Guide to Group Minds. In M. Sprevak & J. Kallestrup (Eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Mind (pp. 301–322). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theiner, G., Allen, C., & Goldstone, R. L. (2010). Recognizing Group Cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 4, 378–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theiner, G., & O’Connor, T. (2010). The Emergence of Group Cognition. In A. Corradini & T. O’Connor (Eds.), Emergence in Science and Philosophy (pp. 78–117). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in Life. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefsen, D. (2004). Collective Epistemic Agency. Southwest Philosophy Review, 1, 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefsen, D. (2006). From Extended Mind to Collective Mind. Cognitive Systems Research, 2–3, 140–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefsen, D. (2015). Groups as Agents. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefsen, D., Dale, R., & Paxton, A. (2013). Alignment, Transactive Memory, and Collective Cognitive Systems. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and Semantic Memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of Memory. Academic Press.

  • Tuomela, R. (2000). Cooperation: A Philosophical Study. Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Tuomela, R. (2013). Social Ontology. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. G., Maturana, H. R., & Uribe, R. (1974). Autopoiesis: The Organization of Living Systems, Its Characterization and a Model. Bio Systems, 4, 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J. (1979). Principles of Biological Autonomy. North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (2016). The Embodied Mind, revised edition. MIT Press. (Original work published in 1991).

  • Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. T. (1985). Cognitive Interdependence in Close Relationships. In Compatible and Incompatible Relationships (pp. 253–276). Springer New York.

  • Weldon, M. S. (2001). Remembering as a social process. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 40 (pp. 67–120). Academic Press.

  • Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of Collective Remembering. Cambridge University Press. 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (2009). Collective Memory. In P. Boyer & J. Wertsch (Eds.), Memory in Mind and Culture (pp. 117–137). Cambridge University Press

  • Wheeler, W. M. (1911). The Ant-Colony as an Organism. Journal of Morphology, 2, 307–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, W. M. (1920). The Termitodoxa, or Biology and Society. The Scientific Monthly, 10(2), 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. (1997). Incorporating Group Selection into the Adaptationist Program: A Case Study Involving Human Decision Making. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary Social Psychology (pp. 345–386). Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. A. (2004). Boundaries of the Mind. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. A. (2005). Collective Memory, Group Minds, and the Extended Mind Thesis. Cognitive Processing, 4, 227–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, W. (2009). Retracing the Footsteps of Wilhelm Wundt: Explorations in the Disciplinary Frontiers of Psychology and in Völkerpsychologie. History of Psychology, 12(4), 229–265.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the reviewer for the valuable comments and suggestions. My thanks also to my doctoral advisor Prof. Debarshi Prasad Nath for his overall support.

Funding

I receive no funding for writing this research paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cultural Studies, Tezpur University, Tezpur, Assam, 784028, India

    Premjit Laikhuram

Authors
  1. Premjit Laikhuram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Premjit Laikhuram.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Research involving humans and/or animals

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

I have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laikhuram, P. Collective Memory: Metaphor or Real?. Integr. psych. behav. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09683-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09683-7

Keywords

  • Cultural memory
  • Social cognition
  • Enactive approach
  • Interdisciplinary social science
  • Cultural studies