Skip to main content
Log in

Griefbots. A New Way of Communicating With The Dead?

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 07 April 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

There is a growing number of new digital technologies mediating the experiences of grief and the continuing bonds between the bereaved and their loved ones following death. One of the most recent technological developments is the “griefbot”. Based on the digital footprint of the deceased, griefbots allow two-way communication between mourners and the digital version of the dead through a conversational interface or chat. This paper explores the mediational role that griefbots might have in the grieving process vis-à-vis that of other digital technologies, such as social media services or digital memorials on the Internet. After briefly reviewing the new possibilities offered by the Internet in the way people relate with the dead, we delve into the particularities of griefbots, focusing on the two-way communication afforded by this technology and the sense of simulation derived from the virtual interaction between the living and the dead. Discussion leads us to emphasize that, while both the Internet and griefbots bring about a significant spatial and temporal expansion to the grief experience –affording a more direct way to communicate with the dead anywhere and at any time– they differ in that, unlike the socially shared virtual space between mourners and loved ones in most digital memorials, griefbots imply a private conversational space between the mourner and the deceased person. The paper concludes by pointing to some ethical issues that griefbots, as a profit-oriented afterlife industry, might raise for both mourners and the dead in our increasingly digital societies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Change history

Notes

  1. This is not the case with Google and its—apparently less “disturbing”—assistant Loretta. The Loretta ad (Google, 2020), aired during the 2020 Super Bowl, features a widower using a voice assistant as an aid to remember little things about his late wife Loretta (Leaver, 2021).

  2. This popular assumption is strongly influenced by the Freudian letting-go approach.

  3. There are works exploring inverse cases, namely of bereaved who claim to have received phone calls from the dead—see classic work by Rogo and Bayless (1979).

  4. This is also true in the everyday use of SNSs. As Currie (2007) points out, the speed of near instantaneity enabled by modern technologies leads us to experience the present as the object of a future memory, as it becomes apparent in today’s tendency to stream our lives through social media (see also Brescó, 2021).

References

  • Abramson, D. I., & Johnson, J. (2020). Creating a Conversational Chatbot of a Specific Person (U.S. Patent No. 10,853,717 B2) U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

  • Ahmad, M. A. (2016). After Death: Big Data and the Promise of Resurrection by Proxy. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA, 7–12 May (pp. 397–408). Association for Computing Machinery

  • Ávila-Tomás, F. J., Olano-Espinosa, E., Minué-Lorenzo, C., Martínez-Suberbiola, F. J., Matilla-Pardo, B., Serrano-Serrano, M. E., & Güeto-Rubio, M. V. (2020). & Grupo Dej@lo Dejal@Bot: Un chatbot aplicable en el tratamiento de la deshabituación tabáquica. Revista de Investigación y Educación en Ciencias de la Salud, 5(1), 33–41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37536/RIECS.2020.5.1.196

  • Basset, D. (2015). Who Wants to Live Forever? Living, Dying and Grieving in Our Digital Society. Social Sciences, 4, 1127–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beischel, J., Mosher, C., & Boccuzzi, M. (2015). The Possible Effects on Bereavement of Assisted After-Death Communication during Readings with Psychic Mediums: A Continuing Bonds Perspective. Omega, 70(2), 169–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brescó, I. (2021). Prolepsis. In V. P. Glăveanu (eds), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_142-1

  • Brescó, I., Roncancio, M., Branco, A., & Mattos, E. (2019). Cultural Psychology: a Two-Way Path Between Mind and Culture / Psicología cultural: un camino de ida y vuelta entre la mente y la cultura, Estudios de Psicología, 40(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2019.1565388

  • Brescó, I., & Wagoner, B. (2019). Memory, Mourning, and Memorials. In K. Murakami, T. Kono, T. Zittoun, & J. Cresswell (eds), Ethos of Theorizing: Peer Reviewed Proceedings for the International Society for Theoretical Psychology (pp. 222–233). Captus Press

  • Brinkmann, S. (2018). General Psychological Implications of the Human Capacity for Grief. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 52, 177–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S. (2020). Learning to grieve: A preliminary analysis. Culture & Psychology, 26(3), 469–483. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X19877918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooker, Ch. (Writer), & Harris, O. (2013, February 11). Be Right Back [Television series episode]. In Brooker, Charlie. (creator). Black Mirror. Zeppotron; House of Tomorrow

  • Brubaker, J. R., Hayes, G. R., & Dourish, P. (2013). Beyond the Grave: Facebook as a Site for the Expansion of Death and Mourning. The Information Society: An International Journal, 29(3), 152–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candle, J., & Phillips, W. L. (2003). Grief Rituals: Aspects That Facilitate Adjustment to Bereavement. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 8(1), 41–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cann, C. K. (2014). Virtual Afterlives, Grieving the Dead in the Twenty-First Century. The University Press of Kentucky

  • Currie, M. (2007). About time. Narrative, Fiction, and the philosophy of time. Edinburgh University Press

  • Despret, V. (2015). Au bonheur des morts. Récits de ceux qui restent. La Découverte

  • Dilmaç, J. A. (2018). The New Forms of Mourning: Loss and Exhibition of the Death on the Internet. OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying, 77(3), 280–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doka, K. J. (1989). Disenfranchised Grief: Recognizing Hidden Sorrow. Lexington Books

  • Elder, A. (2020). Conversation from Beyond the Grave? A Neo-Confucian Ethics of Chatbots of the Dead. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 37(1), 73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fussell, S. (2016). You can create an online avatar that lives on after you die—but what’s the point? Splinter. https://splinternews.com/you-can-create-an-online-avatar-that-lives-on-after-you-1793862007

  • Gamba, F. (2018). Coping with Loss: Mapping Digital Rituals for the Expression of Grief. Health Communication, 33(1), 78–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2021). Affordance. In V. P. Glăveanu (ed), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_10-2

  • Google (2020, February 2). Loretta. Google Super Bowl Commercial. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/Google/videos/loretta-google-super-bowl-commercial-2020/888363931601853/

  • Jiménez-Alonso, B., & Brescó, I. (2021a). Narratives of Loss: Exploring Grief through Photography. Qualitative Studies, 6(1), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.7146/qs.v6i1.124433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Alonso, B., & Brescó, I. (2021b). Grief, Photography and Meaning Making: A Psychological Constructivist Approach. Culture & Psychology. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X211015416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasket, E. (2012a). Continuing Bonds in the Age of Social Networking: Facebook as a Modern-Day Medium. Bereavement Care, 31(2), 62–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasket, E. (2012b). The Dead’s Digital Being in a Facebook Profile. Existential Analysis, 23(2), 249–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Klass, D., Silverman, P. R., & Nickman, S. L. (Eds.). (1996). Continuing Bonds: New Understandings of Grief. Taylor & Francis

  • Lagerkvist, A. (2017). Existential Media: Toward a Theorization of Digital Thrownness. New Media & Society, 19(1), 96–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalande, K. M., & Bonanno, G. A. (2006). Culture and Continuing Bonds: A Prospective Comparison of Bereavement in the United States and the People’s Republic of China. Death Studies, 30(4), 303–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leaver, T. (2021, April 21–23). Imagining Digital Death in ‘Loretta’ and Marjorie Prime [Paper presentation]. Death Online Research Symposium #5. Death and the Digital: Methods, Challenges and Interdisciplinary Convergences, Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Lingel, J. (2013). The Digital Remains: Social Media and Practices of Online Grief. The Information Society, 29(3), 190–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, A. (2010). Creating a Presence on Social Networks via Narbs. Global Media Journal, 9, 20–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Myles, D., Cherba, M., & Millerand, F. (2019). Situating Ethics in Online Mourning Research: A Scoping Review of Empirical Studies. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(3), 289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natale, S. (2019). If Software is Narrative: Joseph Weizenbaum, Artificial Intelligence and the Biographies of ELIZA. New Media & Society, 21(3), 712–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, R., Klass, D., & Dennis, M. R. (2014). A Social Constructionist Account of Grief: Loss and the Narration of Meaning. Death Studies, 38, 485–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, C. (2016). Speak, Memory. When Her Best Friend Died, She Used Artificial Intelligence to Keep Talking to Him. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/a/luka-artificial-intelligence-memorial-roman-mazurenko-bot

  • Norlock, K. (2017). Real (and) Imaginal Relationships with the Dead. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 51(2), 341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, T. [@_TimOBrien] (January 22, 2021). I’m looking into this - appln date (Apr. 2017) predates the AI ethics reviews we do today. Twitter. https://twitter.com/_TimOBrien/status/1352645952310439936

  • Öhman, C., & Floridi, L. (2018). An Ethical Framework for the Digital Afterlife Industry. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 318–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paul-Choudhury, S. (2011). Digital Legacy: The Fate of your Online Soul. New Scientist, 210, 41–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogo, S. D., & Bayless, R. (1979). Phone Calls from the Dead. Prentice Hall

  • Savin-Baden, M., Burden, D., & Taylor, H. (2017). The Ethics and Impact of Digital Immortality. Knowledge Cultures, 5(2), 11–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Baden, M., & Burden, D. (2019). Digital Immortality and Virtual Humans. Postdigital Science and Education, 1, 87–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sofka, C. (1997). Social Support “Internetworks,” Caskets for Sale, and More: Thanatology and the Information Superhighway. Death Studies, 21(6), 553–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stroebe, M., Gergen, M., Gergen, K., & Stroebe, W. (1996). Broken Hearts or Broken Bonds?. In D. Klass, P. R. Silverman, & S. L. Nickman (Eds.), Continuing Bonds: New Understandings of Grief (pp. 31–44). Taylor & Francis

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Action: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press

  • Wagoner, B., & Brescó, I. (2021). Collective Grief: Mourning Rituals, Politics and Memorial Sites. In E. H. Kofod, & A. Koester (eds), Experiencing the Death of the Other: Cultural, Existential, and Phenomenological Dimensions of Bereavement (pp. 197–213). Routledge

  • Walter, T. (2015). Communication Media and the Dead: from the Stone Age to Facebook. Mortality, 20(3), 215–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, T., Hourizi, R., Moncur, W., & Pitsillides, S. (2012). Does the Internet Change How We Die and Mourn? Overview and Analysis. OMEGA, 64(4), 275–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford University Press

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors received financial support through a grant on bioethics by the Victor Grífols i Lucas Foundation (Spain). The second author also received financial support through the Culture of Grief Project, funded by the Obel Family Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ignacio Brescó de Luna.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised. The corresponding author name has been updated and the ORCID number 0000-0001-8044-7643 should be for the corresponding author, Ignacio Brescó de Luna. The correct ORCID number of Belén Jiménez-Alonso is 0000-0003-1849-7740.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiménez-Alonso, B., Brescó de Luna, I. Griefbots. A New Way of Communicating With The Dead?. Integr. psych. behav. 57, 466–481 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09679-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09679-3

Keywords

Navigation