Abstract
Drama-in-Education workshops (DiE) emphasize on balancing between teacher’s delicate structuring and participants’ spontaneous exploration and creation in dramatic activities and thus can be a powerful liminoid space to scaffold and facilitate young people’s development. Still, more researches are needed to dig into and understand such a dynamic and complex process happening in the workshop. In this article, we presented the theoretical background of conceptualizing drama as a hybrid cultural-aesthetic form to identify its potential in educational guidance. The perspective of developmental cultural psychology was introduced to frame DiE practice as a catalytic process working on releasing and transforming participants’ developmental forces. The hierarchical levels of semiotic mediation in cultural psychology can help to capture participants’ affective and cognitive generalizations in semiotic forms and to perform a micro-genetic analysis of the flow of participants’ subjective experiences. We also provided a step-by-step analysis of a DiE practice working with young Chinese immigrants to illuminate our theoretical proposal.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbey, E. (2007). Perpetual uncertainty of cultural life: Becoming reality. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of socio-cultural psychology (pp. 362–372). Cambridge University Press.
Abbey, E., & Bastos, A. C. (2014). Creating bridges to the future: The poetic dimension through family life. Culture & Psychology, 20(2), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X14527840
Branco, A., & Valsiner, J. (2010). Towards cultural psychology of affective processes: Semiotic regulation of dynamic fields. Estudios De Psicologia, 31(3), 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093910793154411
Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual Minds. Harvard University Press.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. Minton, Balch, and Company.
Davis, D. (2014). Imagining the Real: Towards a New Theory of Drama in Education. Trentham Books.
Dewey, J. (1950). Aesthetic experience as a primary phase and as an artistic development. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 9(1), 56–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/426103
de Mattos, E., & Chaves, A. M. (2013). Semiotic regulation through inhibitor signs: Creating a cycle of rigid meanings. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47(1), 95–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-012-9223-x
DICE Consortium. (2010). Making a world of difference, A DICE resource for practitioners on educational theatre and drama. Retrieved December 1, 2020, from http://www.dramanetwork.eu/file/Education%20Resource%20long.pdf
Ganczarek, J., Hünefeldt, T., & Olivetti Belardinelli, M. (2018). From “Einfühlung” to empathy: Exploring the relationship between aesthetic and interpersonal experience. Cognitive Processing, 19, 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-018-0861-x
Heathcote, D. (1984). Collected writings on education and drama (L. Johnson & C. O’Neill, Eds.). Hutchinson.
Heggstad, K.M. (2019). 7 paths to drama in education. (M. Y. Wang & Z. Wang Trans.). East China Normal University Press
Key concepts in Chinese thoughts and culture. (n.d. 1). Retrieved November, 13, 2020, from https://www.chinesethought.cn/EN/shuyu_show.aspx?shuyu_id=2325
Key concepts in Chinese thoughts and culture. (n.d. 2). Retrieved November, 13, 2020, from https://www.chinesethought.cn/EN/shuyu_show.aspx?shuyu_id=2254
Kundera, M. (1984). The unbearable lightness of being. (S. G. Han & G. Han Tans.). Writers Publishing House.
Lehmann, O. V., & Brinkmann, S. (2020). Revisiting “the art of being fragile”: Why cultural psychology needs literature and poetry. Culture & Psychology, 26(3), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X19862183
Marsico, G., & Tateo, L. (2017). Borders, tensegrity and development in dialogue. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(4), 536–556.
Mortola, P. (1999). Narrative Formation and Gestalt Closure: Helping Clients Make Sense of “Disequilibrium” Through Stories in the Therapeutic Setting. Gestalt Review, 3(4), 308–320.
O'Neill, C. (1995). Drama worlds: A framework for process drama. Heinemann Drama.Pascarella, F., Vicigrado, A., Tateo, L. & Marsico, G. (submitted). Spontaneous dramatization as dialogical space in the school context, Human Arenas.
Pascarella, F., Vicigrado, A., Tateo, L., & Marsico, G. (2021). Spontaneous dramatization as dialogical space in the school context. Human Arenas, 1–17
Rasmussen, B., & Wright, P. R. (2001). The theatre workshop as educational space: How imagined reality is voiced and conceived. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 2(2). Retrieved December 3, 2020, from http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/3105
Tateo, L. (2019). Caravaggio’s The Seven Works of Mercy and the Art of Generalization. In Subjectivity and Knowledge (pp. 141–156). Springer
Tateo, L. (2020). A Theory of Imagining, Knowing, and Understanding. Springer.
Turner, V. (1982). Liminal to liminoid, in play, flow, and ritual: An essay in comparative symbology. From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play (pp. 20–60). PAJ publications.
Valsiner, J. (2008). Open intransitivity cycles in development and education: Pathways to synthesis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172741
Valsiner, J. (2012a). Oxford handbook of culture and psychology. Oxford University Press.
Valsiner, J. (2012b). La dialéctica en el studio del desarrollo. In J. A. Castorina and M. Carretero (Eds), Desarrollo cognitive y educacíón. Vol 1. (pp. 138–162). Paidos.
Valsiner, J. (2015). The place for synthesis: Vygotsky’s analysis of affective generalization. History of the Human Sciences, 28(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695114559530
Valsiner, J. (2018). Needed in psychology: Theoretical precision. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i1.1602
Valsiner, J. (2019). Culture & psychology: 25 constructive years. Culture & Psychology, 25(4), 429–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X19872358
Valsiner, J. (2020). Sensuality in human living: The cultural psychology of affect. Springer.
Vassilieva, J., & Zavershneva, E. (2020). Vygotsky’s “Height Psychology”: Reenvisioning General Psychology in Dialogue With the Humanities and the Arts. Review of General Psychology, 24(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020902723
Veresov, N., & Fleer, M. (2016). Perezhivanie as a theoretical concept for researching young children’s development. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(4), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1186198
von Fircks, E. F. (2021). Daseinssemiosis: a New Look at the Phenomenology of Theodor Lipps. Human Arenas, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-020-00159-x
Vygotsky, L. S. (1925). The psychology of art. MIT Press.
Wang, D. F. (2005). Philosophy of art. Fudan University Press.
Wang, D. F. (2005b). On the tension between the Chinese cultural spirit and the Western capital principle. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (philosophy & Social Sciences Edition), 34(6), 1–10.
Wang, D. F. (2016). On Marx’s concept of sensuous consciousness. Journal of Yunnan University (social Sciences Edition), 5, 3–8.
Wang, J. (2018). Construction of Jiti for students' active development- an interventional research in the charitable vocational training program. Unpublished master's degree thesis, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Xu, S. S., Li, X. W & Wang, J. (2018). “Castle in Box”: How Immersion and Rational Reflection Work Together for Effective Intervention. In Brown, S., & Tateo, L. (Eds.). The method of imagination. IAP. 143–152.
Zittoun, T. (2012). On the emergence of the subject. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43(3), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-012-9203-1
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Huiru Yan and Xinhuang Chen from Shanghai Theatre Academy and Xiaowen Li from East China Normal University for their support in devising and conducting the workshop. We are also grateful to Kari Mjaaland Heggstad and Sisi Zheng from Western Norway University of Applied Sciences and participants in living-room seminar organized by Jaan Valsiner in facilitating ideas for analyzing the empirical data. Also many thanks to Enno von Fircks and another anonymous reviewer. Their constructive suggestions has helped us a lot in improving our work.
Funding
The author Shuangshuang Xu received funding from China Scholarship Council for her phd study in Denmark (No. 201808310229).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
The study with humans has been approved by University Committee on Human Research Protection, East China Normal University.
Conflicts of Interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, S., Wang, J. & Tateo, L. Dramatizing Living-in-the-World: Affective Generalization in Drama-in-Education Workshop. Integr. psych. behav. 56, 513–541 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-021-09625-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-021-09625-9